Ut Oh, Could Nancy Be Facing....

Are you sayin' Walter and Thomas are liberals ? ! ? ! ?

Thomas ain't a gonna like that, he says he's a libertarian. Walter is gonna look at what liberal means in Germany, and conceive a grudge against you.

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

McGentrix wrote:

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

Yippie!!! I forgot about that part. I'm going to hire me some illegals today!

McGentrix wrote:

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

No, they aren't. When Liberals hire illegal aliens, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare.

If Pelosi is hiring illegals, she should be fined and probably kicked from the House.

But, she isn't, or at least, there have been no allegations that she does, so why are we even discussing this?

Cycloptichorn

The only place in the thread I haven't addressed at this point is:
I earlier branded OccomBill a liberal, though, which is rash.

OCCOM BILL wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

Yippie!!! I forgot about that part. I'm going to hire me some illegals today!

Going to? Who's cooking for you now?

McGentrix wrote:

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

No, they aren't. When Liberals hire illegal aliens, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare.

If Pelosi is hiring illegals, she should be fined and probably kicked from the House.

But, she isn't, or at least, there have been no allegations that she does, so why are we even discussing this?

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

Okie, when conservatives mistakenly hire illegals, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare. When liberals do it, they are upholding unethical immigration policies, demonstrating courage and thinking outside the box.

No, they aren't. When Liberals hire illegal aliens, they are breaking the law, morally bankrupt and liars beyond compare.

If Pelosi is hiring illegals, she should be fined and probably kicked from the House.

But, she isn't, or at least, there have been no allegations that she does, so why are we even discussing this?

Cycloptichorn

No solid proof, but quite a few allegations or questions, cyclops. And of course the press has no interest in this. And if someone else digs information up, they are labeled as some right wing kook and therefore not credible by the libs. The guy heading up the minutemen has alot of very legitimate questions:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25180

Cyclops, if you are sincere, I continue to suggest you will soon see the light and the error of your ways in continuing to defend the indefensible hypocrisy of the Democrats.

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

Would that labeling be attributable to leftwing kook sites and their afficionados? :wink:

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

timberlandko wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

Would that labeling be attributable to leftwing kook sites and their afficionados? :wink:

I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who takes their work seriously.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

I told you, cyclops!! Instead of debating the points, Front Page is simply a kook site, right?

Seems to me like Gilchrist has some legitimate questions. Some of this makes no sense whatsoever, such as why wouldn't you need to be a citizen to get a drivers license?????? I think some people have simply lost all ability to think logically. Why have any laws whatsoever if they mean nothing?

Cycloptichorn wrote:

timberlandko wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

Would that labeling be attributable to leftwing kook sites and their afficionados? :wink:

I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who takes their work seriously.

Cycloptichorn

Depends on what your politics are, cyclops.

Does anyone take the ACLU seriously, besides left wing nut cases?

Cycloptichorn wrote:

timberlandko wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

And 'frontpagemag' has been labelled a right wing kook site long before any of this came up.

Cycloptichorn

Would that labeling be attributable to leftwing kook sites and their afficionados? :wink:

I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who takes their work seriously.

Cycloptichorn

Depends on what your politics are, cyclops.

Does anyone take the ACLU seriously, besides left wing nut cases?

The entirety of the Able2Know community apparently wants to let Pelosi off the hook after marching in a parade three positions away from a notorious NAMBLA advocate. I see no reason to change my own position on her after reading the many posts.

The march was in 2001, and this is five years later when the first connection is being discussed. That's because up to 2006, Nancy Pelosi wasn't three heartbeats away from the presidency and she wasn't being as heavily scrutinized. More scrutiny from the opposition always accompanies attainment of power, especially when superlatives are launched like "We will have the most ethical Congress in history" LOL!

The only place in the thread I haven't addressed at this point is:
I earlier branded OccomBill a liberal, though, which is rash.

Haven't got a lot of time, but to Dlowan, it's never nice to laugh at someone who's been called filthy names. There's a real human being behind the keyboard you're talking to. If you don't want to be considered a troll yourself, you might think about that. It takes a big person to admit a mistake. Apparently, not everyone is willing to make the leap.

Gilchrist's article was so all over the place, that I couldn't find a bit of it that actually made any sense OR actually made any factual allegations against Pelosi.

Cycloptichorn

Looks like a fun group Bill.