Snood, thanks for the reminder - havent installed Firefox yet, perhaps I'll do it this weekend.
McGentrix wrote:nimh wrote:Cant wait till we have the "ignore" function.
Is that so you can segregate out the minority of conservatives on A2K and never have to have your opinons questioned?
Errr, No. (Duh)
(Yes, for once I'll allow myself the use of "duh", since the assumption is so dumb.)
No, I will happily and gladly converse and discuss with various conservatives here, when time permits - as I have at length and with gusto before. (As you know damn well since you've been here a couple of years already.)
But posters who are solely interested in baiting, flaming and scoring points, I will happily ignore, yes - the way that I don't seem able to do now.
I know that there are some here who imagine themselves, when posting one or the other snideness, as some kind of boxer, landing punches and "counterpunches" on the other's "extended chin" - and note that here, I am merely using the colourful metaphor that Finn chose to describe
himself in another thread - after he had pointed out a language mistake of mine...
I remember reading that and just thinking, "what?" Earlier in that thread already some liberal had also posted a picture of Muhammed Ali and opponent, to portray himself and Tico, I think. I mean, are they serious? Bunch of geeks that we are, typing away at a keyboard discussing politics with virtual strangers - imagining themselves as landing and receiving masculine blows on the extended chin? Our little to-and-fro's as some sort of heroic boxer's battle, being punched out in the 'ring' of A2K?
Talk about an inflated sense of self. Explains something about why we dont have a great many women contributing, I guess - boys and their fevered imaginations of playing soldier, or something.
In any case, to get back to your question, I can think of only a handful of conservative posters whom I'd actually ignore - and thats counting the multiple-identity weirdo (better categorized as insane than conservative).
And about as many liberals.
So - no.
<nods>