Cycloptichorn wrote:woiyo wrote:Cycloptichorn wrote:I don't disagree with assessments that the link is weak. But, it isn't a good thing, one way or the other. And if it turns out to have more legs, well, it could quickly become a bad thing.
Sort of like the accusations against Reid - which I will be happy to argue about in the appropriate thread - weak, but not that bad unless the story gets worse.
Cycloptichorn
And you're apparently in denial. Reid, IMO is a bigger scumbag than the "Doinker" since he used his influence, either directly or indirecly, to benefit himself and his friends. Who did the "doinker" hurt? NOONE!
If the the 'doinker' you mean Foley, he preyed on young men in a sexual manner and used his influence to get laid. Which I think probably damages some of them.
I haven't seen any actual evidence that Reid used his influence to do anything; and neither have you. Or else you would present it.
Cycloptichorn
Youhave seen no evidence that the "young man" was injured. He must have enjoyed it, he is stillthere!
Here is why you and your liberal friends in the Dummycrat party are hypocrites.
You said NOTHING when Barney Frank was "getting laid" in his office. The "party" embraced him in the name od diversity. Your Parrty did not care about Scuggs (sp) when he was getting laid. You embraced him in the name of diversity.
But in the name of partisenship, you have buried the "doinker" FOLEY, and go after Hastert (another idiot, but another discussion), for purely political leverage at election time.
Your hypocracy is quite transparent. Whatever happened to the Dummycrats and their spirit of inclusion? It is a one way street for Dummycrats only.
