okie wrote:Hey, I thought personal lives were personal and should not matter? I agree he should be thrown out, but I am surprised at you libs getting all stirred up here about somebody's personal life???? I am really confused about you people now. I don't know where you stand on this issue. Please explain.
Er...poor old okie.
You are sooo easy to confuse.
I wonder if we can help you in words of one syllable or less?
Let me try.
I think that per so nal lives are pri vate where they do not break the law.... or do not violate...I mean break...ethical...sorry, codes of good behaviour...I mean codes that tell us how to act in our professional...damn, I mean..(what's a one syllable word for professional, folks? Help me a little here!)..in our lives on the job...
There are laws that say we can't have sex with kids. This man said he thought such laws were good. While he said that he broke them (this is getting easier!)
He broke the law. Even worse, he broke the law he said he thought was good and that he said a lot that men and wo men who are not him should go to jail if they break.
This is not the same in a big way as sex with per son who is grown up and thus no law says you can't have sex with.
Phew.
I don't think I can do that ever again.
Is anyone capable of making it even simpler so okie may have a fighting chance of grasping it?