0
   

Foley Quits Amid Allegations of Email Sex Scandal

 
 
snood
 
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 09:24 pm
Rep. Mark Foley (R- Fla) quit Congress abruptly on Friday after some instant messages he has sent an underage congressional page surfaced.

This is sort of jarring for republicans, who have to scramble for a replacement candidate, two weeks before the big tussle over seats in the House.

What do y'all think about this?

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/09/29/national/w123452D40.DTL
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 31,295 • Replies: 774
No top replies

 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 09:35 pm
What a dumb-ass. He deserves what he gets.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 09:35 pm
I think it's pretty damned disgraceful. To think that this elected official headed up an organization fighting against this very thing, sexual predators on the internet, is beyond ironic.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 09:54 pm
Funny, I knew about this six years ago. I was wondering when it was going to come out.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 11:00 pm
worse yet, the House leadership has known for several months and has done nothing.

What are they like the Roman Catholic Church or something?

Mr. Foley is lucky the father of that boy didn't up and shoot the sick bastard. had the young man been my child I would have.

sadly the NAMBLA vote would not be enough to ....ahem, put Mr. Foley over the top.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 11:09 pm
Quote:
washingtonpost.com
Rep. Foley Quits In Page Scandal
Explicit Online Notes Sent to Boy, 16


By Charles Babington and Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, September 30, 2006; A01

Six-term Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) resigned yesterday amid reports that he had sent sexually explicit e-mails to at least one underage male former page.

Foley, who was considered likely to win reelection this fall, said in a three-sentence letter of resignation: "I am deeply sorry and I apologize for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent."

The resignation rocked the Capitol, and especially Foley's GOP colleagues, as lawmakers were rushing to adjourn for at least six weeks. House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) told The Washington Post last night that he had learned this spring of some "contact" between Foley and a 16-year-old page. Boehner said he told House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), and that Hastert assured him "we're taking care of it."

It was not immediately clear what actions Hastert took. His spokesman had said earlier that the speaker did not know of the sexually charged e-mails between Foley and the boy.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) took the House floor last night to demand an investigation into the Foley matter. But Boehner headed her off, calling on the House to refer the matter to the ethics committee, which the House promptly voted unanimously to do.

The news of Foley's resignation overshadowed an afternoon Republican ceremony hailing a military commissions bill, and it gave Democrats sudden hopes of winning the Palm Beach-based 16th District. Many lawmakers think Democrats are on the verge of winning control of the House in November, and an unexpected gain could prove crucial.

At the Capitol Hill signing ceremony for the commissions bill, a GOP campaign priority, reporters asked Hastert only about Foley. "He's done the right thing," Hastert replied. "I've asked John Shimkus [R-Ill.], who is head of the Page Board, to look into this issue regarding Congressman Foley. We want to make sure that all of our pages are safe and our page system is safe. None of us are happy about it."

ABC News reported yesterday that it had interviewed Foley, 52, about excerpts of instant messages provided by current and former pages under the age of 18. ABC reported that Foley, under the AOL Instant Messenger screen name Maf54, made repeated references to sexual acts and body parts. Foley's spokesman did not respond to a Washington Post request for comment on the ABC report.

Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.), who sponsored the page from his district, said he had learned of some of the online exchanges from a reporter some months ago and passed on the information to Rep. Thomas Reynolds (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House Republican campaign organization, the Associated Press reported. Alexander said he did not pursue the matter further because "his parents said they didn't want me to do anything."

Carl Forti, a spokesman for the GOP campaign organization, said Reynolds learned from Alexander that the parents did not want to pursue the matter, AP reported.

Shimkus said in a statement last night, "in late 2005, I was notified by the then Clerk of the House," that Alexander had told the Clerk "about an email exchange between Congressman Foley and a former House Page. I took immediate action to investigate the matter."

In the email, "Foley asked about the former Page's well-being after Hurricane Katrina and requested a photograph," Shimkus said. He said Foley assured him it was an innocent exchange, but "nevertheless, we ordered Congressman Foley to cease all contact" with the boy and to respect all pages. "Only now have I learned that Congressman Foley was not honest about his conduct," Shimkus said.

The news emboldened Democrats that they could gain the 15 seats they need to regain the House majority they lost in 1994. The Florida district's Democratic nominee, Tim Mahoney, has been running a credible campaign, raising more than $700,000 and airing TV ads for nearly a month, according to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. The committee said it is too late under Florida law to remove Foley's name as the GOP nominee on the Nov. 7 ballot, a circumstance that would greatly improve Mahoney's chances of being elected.

But Forti said lawyers hope they can replace Foley's name on the ballot. At a minimum, he said, party officials can designate an alternate candidate who would be credited with all votes cast for Foley on Nov. 7. "It's a very Republican seat," Forti said, adding that Republicans "can move forward" when they have a new candidate.

Florida GOP Chairwoman Carole Jean Jordan said in a statement that executives from each county in Foley's district "will meet to choose a replacement on the ballot." Possible candidates include state Rep. Joe Negron, she said. The decision, she said, is "very time-sensitive" because the replacement "would have the opportunity to get around the district and campaign in a very short amount of time."

Foley's resignation was startlingly sudden. He was a respected House member cruising toward a seventh term when ABC News reported Thursday that he had sent brief, chatty e-mails last year to a boy, then 16, who had been a House page. In them, Foley asked the boy's age and what he wanted for his birthday. He requested a picture of the boy and told him that he had just finished a long bike ride and was going to the gym. ABC reported that the boy forwarded the photo-request e-mail to an unidentified congressional staffer and wrote that the message was "sick sick sick sick sick."

Efforts by The Washington Post to reach the boy were unsuccessful. But he told the St. Petersburg Times last November: "I thought it was very inappropriate. After the one about the picture, I decided to stop e-mailing him back." The Times, which did not disclose the teenager's name, did not publish his comments until yesterday.

The e-mails were posted Friday on the Web site of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington after ABC News reported their existence. The liberal-leaning watchdog group asked the House ethics committee to investigate the exchange Foley had with the boy.

Foley, who is single, moved to Florida as a child and opened a restaurant in Lake Worth at age 20. He also sold real estate and moved quickly into politics. He was elected to Florida's House in 1990, to the state Senate in 1992 and to the U.S. House in 1994.

In Congress, Foley pushed bills to deport imprisoned illegal immigrants and to amend the Constitution so that children born in the United States are not automatically citizens. He also sought to increase the number of immigrants admitted as farmworkers. He obtained a Government Accountability Office report into irregularities at cemeteries and crematoriums, and he called for tougher regulation of funeral workers.

Foley chaired the House caucus on missing and exploited children and was credited with writing the sexual-predator provisions of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, which Bush signed in July. A photo on the White House Web site shows Foley among those attending the signing ceremony.

In 2003, Foley faced questions about his sexual orientation as he prepared to run for Sen. Bob Graham's post. At a news conference in May of that year, he said he would not comment on rumors that he was gay. He later decided not to seek the Senate seat to care for his parents.

Congressional pages are teenagers who live in a Capitol Hill dorm and attend a special school while serving in the House and Senate. The program generally is trouble-free, but in July 1983 the House censured Reps. Daniel B. Crane (R-Ill.) and Gerry E. Studds (D-Mass.) for sexual misconduct with House pages.

Research editor Lucy Shackelford and political researcher Zachary A. Goldfarb contributed to this report.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company


The info is coming in fast for a Fri. night. I do believe we'll hear more about this for, oh, the rest of fricking forever.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 06:24 am
According to CNN his name will be on the ballot in November. The FL Republicans will name a replacement candidate but in order to vote for that person a vote must be cast for Foley.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 06:37 am
That's in the papers as well.

[And exactly that puzzled me a lot - but we have a "candidate votes" here (with a seocnd vote in federal and state elections [only] for a party), so that may be the reason.]

From the Chicago Tribune:

Quote:
The new sexual predator law that Foley championed imposes mandatory 10-year prison sentences for sex crimes against people under the age of 18. With the Internet in mind, it outlaws depictions of the sexual abuse of children and the transfer of obscene material to minors. It also shores up requirements for sex offenders to regularly report their whereabouts to authorities. Along the way, his office sent out one public statement after another, often in bold capital letters, warning that convicted sex offenders were running loose, evading public scrutiny despite a law requiring them to be listed in a national registry.
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 11:53 am
What a clever way of disguising your own addiction. Who would ever suspect a champion of clean family living?
.
Those Republicans are clever as can be.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 12:45 pm
And he's not the first. Who was it that got busted just a while back down in Texas for practically the same thing, child pornography, pedaphelia, something, altho he was straight, I think, looking at little girls or was it children and adults having sex? Sick ******.

It's so disgusting. And if this one got caught, that tells me that there are others, more who simply haven't been caught yet and it's got to be prevalent, if the kids, THE BOYS, have to warn each other. Geez...
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 12:50 pm
The thing is, the house repubs knew about this a year ago and sat on it not referring to the ethics committee but instead referring it to the campaign relection committee. total sleeze from the repubs.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 01:23 pm
Absolutely.

I don't get it. I don't understand how anyone could defend a child abuser and cover up for them. That was the question with the Catholic Church and with this as well. I mean, what is worthy of that? What has this man done that is so great, so humane, to make his cronies and peers just turn their heads to this ugly, predatory side in him?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 03:36 pm
COVER-UP:
What Did They Know And When Did They Know It… http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901574.html
0 Replies
 
CerealKiller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 03:46 pm
eoe wrote:
I think it's pretty damned disgraceful. To think that this elected official headed up an organization fighting against this very thing, sexual predators on the internet, is beyond ironic.


The ironic thing is that the congressman may be tried and convicted under the very law he helped to pass. Laughing
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 03:53 pm
A psychologist would have a field day with that. Do you suppose he ever thought about it? That he was rubberstamping his own fate?
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 05:02 pm
Not to worry. The Republicans are masters in the art of protecting their own. He will get away with a slap on the wrist.
.
Remember the Thomas-Hill controversy?
.
http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/H/htmlH/hill-thomash/hill-thomas.htm
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 05:53 pm
Hey, I thought personal lives were personal and should not matter? I agree he should be thrown out, but I am surprised at you libs getting all stirred up here about somebody's personal life???? I am really confused about you people now. I don't know where you stand on this issue. Please explain.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 06:14 pm
okie wrote:
Hey, I thought personal lives were personal and should not matter? I agree he should be thrown out, but I am surprised at you libs getting all stirred up here about somebody's personal life???? I am really confused about you people now. I don't know where you stand on this issue. Please explain.
let it sufice to say that you are confused.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 06:24 pm
dyslexia wrote:
okie wrote:
Hey, I thought personal lives were personal and should not matter? I agree he should be thrown out, but I am surprised at you libs getting all stirred up here about somebody's personal life???? I am really confused about you people now. I don't know where you stand on this issue. Please explain.
let it sufice to say that you are confused.


now now, we all know okie's hidden agenda, he fully supports 52 year old men having anal intercourse with underage boys. in fact it might well be one of his own hobbies, otherwise why would he defend as merely "personal" the actions of Foley?

its not that you're dumb, okie; that too, its that you are a gross hypocrite
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 06:28 pm
okie wrote:
Hey, I thought personal lives were personal and should not matter? I agree he should be thrown out, but I am surprised at you libs getting all stirred up here about somebody's personal life???? I am really confused about you people now. I don't know where you stand on this issue. Please explain.


Er...poor old okie.

You are sooo easy to confuse.

I wonder if we can help you in words of one syllable or less?

Let me try.


I think that per so nal lives are pri vate where they do not break the law.... or do not violate...I mean break...ethical...sorry, codes of good behaviour...I mean codes that tell us how to act in our professional...damn, I mean..(what's a one syllable word for professional, folks? Help me a little here!)..in our lives on the job...


There are laws that say we can't have sex with kids. This man said he thought such laws were good. While he said that he broke them (this is getting easier!)

He broke the law. Even worse, he broke the law he said he thought was good and that he said a lot that men and wo men who are not him should go to jail if they break.


This is not the same in a big way as sex with per son who is grown up and thus no law says you can't have sex with.


Phew.


I don't think I can do that ever again.


Is anyone capable of making it even simpler so okie may have a fighting chance of grasping it?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Foley Quits Amid Allegations of Email Sex Scandal
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 04:18:34