kate4christ03 wrote:setanta wrote
Quote:Your condescension was a product of your ignorance--your supposition that the original post could only refer to something of which you had heard, but not something of which you are actually ignornant.
first off i never made the supposition that it could only refer to something that i knew about...
kate wrote
Quote:setanta i never made the supposition that the church of nazarene originated from that of the nazarites of the bible....i threw in the word "maybe" bc i didnt know...and further posts show that i see there is no correlation....
setanta wrote
Quote:I did not say that you had made such a supposition--so this is a non-sequitur. What i did point out was your ignorance in assuming that this had to do with nazarites becauase you were ignorant of the Nazarenes.
and setanta you are going around in circles....
No, you're reading comprehension is at fault again. I stated that your supposition was that the original post could not refer something of which you had not heard. At no time did i state that you made the supposition that the Church of the Nazarene derived from the nazarites. I cannot be faulted for your ineptitude with the English language.
Quote:you first say i was being condescending and making suppositions ..then you say that you didnt say that.....and why do you keep restating that i didnt know anything about the nazarenes its evident with my initial post that I said i didnt know anything about them...
It is apparent that you are incapable of understanding the distinction between the suppositions and condescension of which i did accuse you, and your subsequent misstatement of the suppositions and condescension. I don't deny that i accused you of making suppositions and addressing that member in a condescending manner--but i did not accuse you of the suppositions and condescension as you have characterized it--you fail to accurately paraphrase what i say, and when i deny that i said what you falsely claim i said, you then attempt to claim that i've contradicted myself. I've done no such thing. The fact that you were ignorant of the Nazarenes does not alter that you assumed, because of that ignorance, that the initial post referred to something to which it did not in fact refer. Because of your ignorance, you assumed error on the part of that member arising from that member's ignorance of the nazarites--that constituted supposition on your part (in that you supposed the original member had confused Nazarene and nazarite) and condescension (you sought to enlighten the ignorance of that member, when in fact you were only displaying your own ignorance).
Quote:...and i havent laughed or mocked anyone that has disagreed with me......i've laughed at posts made and even things ive said but i havent intentionally been mocking....
Perhaps it will surprise you to learn that many people experience being laughed at as mockery. Certainly it is mockery when i laugh at your appallingly poor ability to express yourself in the English language--so perhaps you can begin to see why when you type "LOL" in your posts, as you so often do, simply because someone had dared to disagree with your whacky exegesis, those persons might find that to have been mockery.
Quote:Setanta you seem to have a problem with me standing firm on what i believe in..and not throwing in the phrase "in my opinion"..Yet you say things like "biblethumping fairy tales" or "imaginary friend superstition" and i have yet to see you say "in my opinion" when stating your views
Yeah--it's called a dose of your own medicine. Don't like the taste, do you?
Quote:shall i now say that you have no right to your view that you belief is right....or should i call you a hypocrite for griping at me for standing on what i believe in... when you yourself does the same thing.....and where have i stated my interpretation of a passage of scripture is right when its been wrong..
See, now you once again display your inability to comprehend. I'm not peddling a belief here--i'm expressing my unwillingness to swallow your goofy beliefs.
