0
   

WHO WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER?

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 06:02 pm
I think that might become the "Kerry syndrome" Smile
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 06:11 pm
mysteryman wrote:


So,you are now saying that the voters dont know what they want and if Lieberman wins it will all be a mistake?

You have very little faith in the voters,dont you?


You are confusing two completely independent statements. By "independent" I mean that whether one is true has no impact on whether the other is true or false.

1) Voters don't know what they want.
2) If Lieberman wins it will all be a mistake.

However, I happen to believe that both these are true.

For that matter, it is also true that I have very little faith in voters.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Nov, 2006 06:13 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
I think that might become the "Kerry syndrome" Smile


For me "Kerry Syndrome" is when a particularly nasty woman runs sleezy campaign ads that backfire wonderfully.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Nov, 2006 09:47 am
...HOW WILL MUSLIM CITIZENS VOTE ?...

above is the link to an article from the pakistani newspaper
"DAWN" . it should be interesting to see how many muslim american citizens will exercise the vote and where their votes will go .
i did not not really realize how many american citizens are muslims ; the article certainly gives me a better understanding . i had not seen a similar article in any american newspaper or TV-news.
hbg

from the article :
"US Muslims gear up for elections
By Abdus Sattar Ghazali

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov 1: An intensive voter registration and get-out-the-vote drive is under way in the seven-million strong American Muslim community before the Nov 7 mid-term election. At least two million Muslims are registered voters with a substantial Muslim voter turnout expected on election day.

The Muslim groups are targeting 12 states with a high concentration of Muslim population: California, Illinois, New York, Texas, New Jersey, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota.

The Muslim American Society, which has set up voter registration booths in mosques across the country, has added 30,000 new voters to the rolls in recent weeks."
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Nov, 2006 10:03 am
I would doubt that many votes will be cast for republican candidates.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 01:28 pm
Though I've seen undercurrents of some opposition to Nancy Pelosi being elected Speaker of the House should the Dems prevail on Tuesday, the following is an opinon piece, but provides an excellent summary of the direction we can expect her to take the majority. Meanwhile, Ms Pelosi is AWOL, out of sight, nowhere to be found or seen. I wonder why?

A look at Pelosi's voting record
TODAY'S EDITORIAL
Washington Times
November 3, 2006


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi would bring to the office a level of left-wing liberalism that will be unprecedented. In the National Journal's 2005 ideological ratings, which were based on scores of votes, Mrs. Pelosi was ranked more liberal than 91 percent of her House colleagues on economic issues, 96 percent on social matters and 82 percent on foreign-policy issues. Here are her relative rankings (economic, social, foreign) for 2004 (93, 88, 81), 2003 (92, 89, 70), 2002 (88, 84, 90) and 2001 (94, 83, 93).

Until she received a 95 percent liberal rating in 2005 from the Americans for Democratic Action (the nation's pre-eminent liberal organization), Mrs. Pelosi had racked up five consecutive years (2000-04) of 100 percent ratings. Her lifetime ADA rating is 96 percent. Last year, the American Conservative Union gave her a 0 rating. Her lifetime ACU rating is 3 percent.

Typical for her 20-year House career, Mrs. Pelosi received a 100 percent rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America last year and a 0 rating from the National Right to Life Committee. A Roman Catholic who has repeatedly voted to uphold partial-birth abortion, who has voted against parental notification when minor children seek abortion and who has shown no concern for the rights of the innocent unborn, Mrs. Pelosi has consistently opposed the death penalty.

Over the years, Mrs. Pelosi has consistently voted against welfare reform, including the 1996 bill signed by President Clinton and its re-authorization. In 1998, she opposed a constitutional amendment to permit school prayer in the classroom. In 1999, she opposed allowing state and local governments to display the Ten Commandments on public property, including schools. She has voted against education IRAs. In 2003, she opposed a $10 million program for school vouchers in the District of Columbia. That same year she voted against the 10-year $400 billion Medicare prescription-drug bill because she preferred one that was twice as expensive. Mrs. Pelosi has repeatedly voted for tax increases and opposed tax cuts, even the 2001 bill that doubled the child tax credit to $1,000, among other cuts.

As the United States has become increasingly dependent on foreign sources for oil, Mrs. Pelosi has always opposed drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In recent years, she has become protectionist -- leading the opposition in 2000 against then-President Clinton's successful effort to establish permanent normal trade relations with China. She also opposed giving Mr. Clinton and Mr. Bush trade-promotion authority; and in 2005 she voted against the Central American Free Trade Agreement. In 2004, she voted to end Radio Marti broadcasts to Cuba. She voted to reduce funds for the B-2 intercontinental bomber, which performed superbly in the 1999 Kosovo War, in 2001 in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Mrs. Pelosi has repeatedly opposed anti-missile defense, even as a nuclear-armed North Korea has tested ballistic missiles.
SOURCE
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 01:45 pm
If the Democrats take control of the House, Nancy Pelosi (gasp!), who represents San Francisco (shudder!), will become speaker.

And now she is AWOL, out of sight, nowhere to be found or seen. Foxfyre wonders why?

Perhaps some reading in newspaper would produce relief.

http://i12.tinypic.com/2qamn1e.jpg
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 01:59 pm
There's a tshirt available now that repeats a single line a dozen or so times, each repetition decreasing in letter size...

Can't sleep...the clowns will eat me
Can't sleep...the clowns will eat me

Foxfyre's liberal nightmare has arrived. Nancy Pelosi and I shall feast on her white bones. America is about to invite us to the dining table.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 02:00 pm
Pelosi is against bashing gays, women, the poor, et al. Horrors!!! She even supports balancing the budget, gun control, the UN, getting out of Iraq, canceling tax cuts for the super rich, eliminating US torture, etc.

I can see why the right hates her.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 02:20 pm
Advocate wrote:
Pelosi is against bashing gays, women, the poor, et al. Horrors!!! She even supports balancing the budget, gun control, the UN, getting out of Iraq, canceling tax cuts for the super rich, eliminating US torture, etc.

I can see why the right hates her.

Some people say she has visible bra lines.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 02:50 pm
The Washington Times? I see that Tony has been at it again.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 02:53 pm
dyslexia wrote:
Advocate wrote:
Pelosi is against bashing gays, women, the poor, et al. Horrors!!! She even supports balancing the budget, gun control, the UN, getting out of Iraq, canceling tax cuts for the super rich, eliminating US torture, etc.

I can see why the right hates her.

Some people say she has visible bra lines.


The scandalous hussy must be stopped.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 03:12 pm
I dated a girl once whose brassiere had visible boob lines.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 03:38 pm
Dys, but would you do her?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 03:45 pm
What are your views regarding Evangelist Ted Haggard? Even though he only received massages (choke!), could this have any effect on the elections?

Interestingly, he was probably the number one gay basher in the Christian Right. Bush is high up on the list, which makes one wonder whether he visits the men's room at Lafayette Park.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 03:48 pm
From today's New York Times and very worth reading.


"November 3, 2006
Op-Ed Columnist

Insulting Our Troops, and Our Intelligence

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

George Bush, Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld think you're stupid. Yes, they do.

They think they can take a mangled quip about President Bush and Iraq by John Kerry ?- a man who is not even running for office but who, unlike Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, never ran away from combat service ?- and get you to vote against all Democrats in this election.

Every time you hear Mr. Bush or Mr. Cheney lash out against Mr. Kerry, I hope you will say to yourself, "They must think I'm stupid." Because they surely do.

They think that they can get you to overlook all of the Bush team's real and deadly insults to the U.S. military over the past six years by hyping and exaggerating Mr. Kerry's mangled gibe at the president.

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to the U.S. military than to send it into combat in Iraq without enough men ?- to launch an invasion of a foreign country not by the Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force, but by the Rumsfeld Doctrine of just enough troops to lose? What could be a bigger insult than that?

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than sending them off to war without the proper equipment, so that some soldiers in the field were left to buy their own body armor and to retrofit their own jeeps with scrap metal so that roadside bombs in Iraq would only maim them for life and not kill them? And what could be more injurious and insulting than Don Rumsfeld's response to criticism that he sent our troops off in haste and unprepared: Hey, you go to war with the army you've got ?- get over it.

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than to send them off to war in Iraq without any coherent postwar plan for political reconstruction there, so that the U.S. military has had to assume not only security responsibilities for all of Iraq but the political rebuilding as well? The Bush team has created a veritable library of military histories ?- from "Cobra II" to "Fiasco" to "State of Denial" ?- all of which contain the same damning conclusion offered by the very soldiers and officers who fought this war: This administration never had a plan for the morning after, and we've been making it up ?- and paying the price ?- ever since.

And what could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in Iraq than to send them off to war and then go out and finance the very people they're fighting against with our gluttonous consumption of oil? Sure, George Bush told us we're addicted to oil, but he has not done one single significant thing ?- demanded higher mileage standards from Detroit, imposed a gasoline tax or even used the bully pulpit of the White House to drive conservation ?- to end that addiction. So we continue to finance the U.S. military with our tax dollars, while we finance Iran, Syria, Wahhabi mosques and Al Qaeda madrassas with our energy purchases.

Everyone says that Karl Rove is a genius. Yeah, right. So are cigarette companies. They get you to buy cigarettes even though we know they cause cancer. That is the kind of genius Karl Rove is. He is not a man who has designed a strategy to reunite our country around an agenda of renewal for the 21st century ?- to bring out the best in us. His "genius" is taking some irrelevant aside by John Kerry and twisting it to bring out the worst in us, so you will ignore the mess that the Bush team has visited on this country.

And Karl Rove has succeeded at that in the past because he was sure that he could sell just enough Bush cigarettes, even though people knew they caused cancer. Please, please, for our country's health, prove him wrong this time.

Let Karl know that you're not stupid. Let him know that you know that the most patriotic thing to do in this election is to vote against an administration that has ?- through sheer incompetence ?- brought us to a point in Iraq that was not inevitable but is now unwinnable.

Let Karl know that you think this is a critical election, because you know as a citizen that if the Bush team can behave with the level of deadly incompetence it has exhibited in Iraq ?- and then get away with it by holding on to the House and the Senate ?- it means our country has become a banana republic. It means our democracy is in tatters because it is so gerrymandered, so polluted by money, and so divided by professional political hacks that we can no longer hold the ruling party to account.

It means we're as stupid as Karl thinks we are.

I, for one, don't think we're that stupid. Next Tuesday we'll see."
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 03:50 pm
Hopefully, the fundamentalists will be disheartened and stay home.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 04:01 pm
Wow. Even Freidman. Is a wash of sanity flooding this place finally?
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 04:09 pm
I am hoping that the Dems will win big on Tuesday.

But I must admit a small bit of doubt that we are, in truth, that stupid.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Nov, 2006 04:15 pm
You vote 'em and you vote 'em out. Keeps 'em on their toes. Best system yet even though it is a ball of shite.

Watch the marginals. There's the luxury of grousing in the others.

Meanwhile life outside goes on all around you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/27/2026 at 08:41:25