WHO WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER?

Bush makes gains in NW, as another poll in the same paper says:

Especially GOP supporters backed him again: up from 73% in late August to 81% now.

0 Replies

The polls are controlled by the media which is owned exclusively by the capitalists and the oil cartel. They try to dupe the people with polls that show that the Democrats will defeat Bushie's forces, but in the end, Diebold will defeat the Democrats. Look at the polls in 2004. Many of them predicted that Kerry would win. He did not since the election was stolen especially in Ohio. People in Europe- wake up! The Elections in the USA are fixed!

0 Replies

Conservatives wonder: Will evangelical voters show up?

Quote:

Pastor Bob Coy of the Calvary Chapel, a Ft. Lauderdale church with an average of 18,000 worshipers on Sundays, senses that the abortion and gay-marriage issues aren't resonating as they might have in the past.

"There's an assumption, sadly, that some of those issues are already on their way to the gavel or the verdict without our participation," Coy said.

Instead, he said, his congregation seems greatly interested in such issues as immigration, the Iraq war and the economy.

Chicago Tribune: Evangelical voter turnout in doubt

0 Replies

Yes, as Walter says, the evangelicals have given up on Bushie. The bigoted evangelicals wanted Bushie to crack down on gay people, allow the Ten Commandments to be placed in school rooms and press for the teaching of Creationism in the Schools. Luckily, we have a constitution which bars Bushie from doing that so the evangelicals could not have their agenda put into place. They are indeed dispirited.

0 Replies

In yesterday's Washington Post....fears that the Foley scandal will boost Democrats chances of taking both the house and senate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/02/AR2006100201463.html

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

Bush makes gains in NW, as another poll in the same paper says:

Especially GOP supporters backed him again: up from 73% in late August to 81% now.

It would be interesting to see if the President would be elected to a third term which I suspect would be the case given the dismal candidates the Democrats seem to produce.

However, I wlll point out that neither George W. Bush nor anybody else is running for president in 2006.

0 Replies

Vietnamnurse wrote:

In yesterday's Washington Post....fears that the Foley scandal will boost Democrats chances of taking both the house and senate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/02/AR2006100201463.html

This was not exactly the "October surprise" I was expecting... but what the hey... I like a good surprise.

0 Replies

Foxfyre wrote:

It would be interesting to see if the President would be elected to a third term which I suspect would be the case given the dismal candidates the Democrats seem to produce.

That wasn't questioning in that quoted poll nor did I intend to point at such.

Foxfyre wrote:

However, I wlll point out that neither George W. Bush nor anybody else is running for president in 2006.

As said above: that wasn't a topic in my source nor did the Albuquerque Journal (I've just re-read the complete report) mention anything like that.

I did neither intend to imply that.
Sorry that my response gave you that idea. (Although my English test's results were good enough to go any of the leading US-universities, unfortunately I can't meet your demands.)

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I did neither intend to imply that.
Sorry that my response gave you that idea. (Although my English test's results were good enough to go any of the leading US-universities, unfortunately I can't meet your demands.)

You mean you can't love George W Bush with all your heart and all your soul and never criticize him? How UNAmerican of you.

0 Replies

Ehem, yes, I am an un-American :wink:

0 Replies

Foxfyre wrote:

However, I wlll point out that neither George W. Bush nor anybody else is running for president in 2006.

Just because George W. Bush isn't running doesn't mean that Candidates can't be very effective running against Bush (or in the case of Republicans run from him).

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

(or in the case of Republicans run from him).

heeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehee . . .

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:
It would be interesting to see if the President would be elected to a third term which I suspect would be the case given the dismal candidates the Democrats seem to produce.

That wasn't questioning in that quoted poll nor did I intend to point at such.

Foxfyre wrote:
However, I wlll point out that neither George W. Bush nor anybody else is running for president in 2006.

As said above: that wasn't a topic in my source nor did the Albuquerque Journal (I've just re-read the complete report) mention anything like that.

I did neither intend to imply that.
Sorry that my response gave you that idea. (Although my English test's results were good enough to go any of the leading US-universities, unfortunately I can't meet your demands.)

I made no demands. I only responded to your post. Do you think my comment was inaccurate?

0 Replies

Bob Woodward is back with a new book and says that the Bush administration is trying to conceal how bad things are going in Iraq. Let me tell you - if the Bush administration is concealing things in Iraq they are doing a bad job of it!
--Jay Leno

I believe it was Woodward who said that Bush and the other neocons don't really get upset with bad news concerning them. Rove determined that there are really few people in the middle and, thus, concern need only be for what those on the right learn. Rove concluded, correctly I think, that the right doesn't read the NYTs and other mainstream media that reports on bad news regarding the administration.

0 Replies

Well,if you believe the left,the repubs will win at least 40 seats in the house.

Now,having let the uproar die down,I will explain.

According to many on the left,the repubs stole the Presidential election or cheated to win in both 2000 and 2004.
Now,since it is much easier to rig a local election (which is what a house race is) then it is to rig a national election,the repubs should find it extremely easy to win all of the house races.

0 Replies

The American people are moral people. After they get a good look at the attempts of Mark Foley to seduce scores of under age teen agers and know that the Republican leadership has done absolutely nothing to try to stop these child rapes, the Republicans will lose many more seats in botht the House and Senate than has been predicted.

0 Replies

MarionT wrote:

The American people are moral people. After they get a good look at the attempts of Mark Foley to seduce scores of under age teen agers and know that the Republican leadership has done absolutely nothing to try to stop these child rapes, the Republicans will lose many more seats in botht the House and Senate than has been predicted.

I don't think the Foley uproar will make much of a difference MarionT. I doubt that many voters will walk into the booth and say to themselves "Well, that Foley guy was some nasty fellow. My Representative Smith should have known, so I'm not voting for Smith. Instead, I'm voting democrat." Do you really think that will be the attitude of the average voter? I don't. So other than losing Foley's seat, I don't see this as a big issue for other incumbents.

Of course, I could be wrong. But I doubt it. :wink:

0 Replies

How many won't vote at all because of it?

As I said in the other thread, as little as 2 or 3 percent could make a big difference in a lot of races. So I'm sure it will have some effect, just as Iraq has some effect, just as overwhelming spending by the gov't has some effect, etc.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

If it turns out that the whole Foley matter was known to the Democrats and, rather than "protecting the kids' they held the the information to be an October surprise to skewer Republicans as Drudge suggests, will Democrat voters stay home and not vote?

0 Replies

WHO WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know