Nuke Iran

Traditionally,
when thay say that,
thay have a sword against
some Christian 's neck,
and thay 've PROVEN on videotape, in living color,
that it is not a bluff.

It is ONLY a religious war; nothing else.

Quote:

It is ONLY a religious war; nothing else.

this is rubbish.

Its a war to control oil, in which both sides are using religious dupes.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

echi wrote:

We shouldn't look to religion for the root of the problem.
This is NOT a religious war.
The perverts waging this extremist violence are not religious leaders.

It appears that u r not up on current events.
Atta led the 9/11 attacks
for purely, and singularly obsessive religious reasons.
That is true also for Laden, his leader.
It is ONLY a religious war; nothing else.

David,
Only the crazies are claiming that this violence has anything to do with true Islam.
I am not a judge of what is true
nor false Islam, nor is that any of my business,
but I know that Atta led the 9/11 attacks
because he was a MOSLEM.

I believe the more rational, peaceful Muslims.
You believe the crazies. Why?
I 'll explain it AGAIN:
because THAY are shooting up the town
and THAY are running suicidal Moslem boming campaigns,
and the ONLY reason that thay r doing that
is that thay are MOSLEMS;
if thay changed their minds and
became something different,
then thay 'd STOP the murdering.



Like Americanadian stated about Zionists and Jews:

Quote:

Please rename them Zionists, the real Jews would appreciate the effort to differentiate the two. They are tired of being "lumped together" with a secular group of terrorists, portraying themselves to be Jews
As far as I am aware,
the brave fellows in the Israeli Air Force jets
were Jews; if that is false,
then please so inform me.
I have no information
as to whether thay were Zionists.
I 'm not even 100% sure what that is.
I have never considered that to be my fight.



and holding the middle east and America hostage.

I don't see why you insist on looking at this as a religious war.
It is because that is the ONLY reason
that the war EXISTS.

To solve that problem would require the elimination of at least one major, world religion. I don't take issue with Muslims;
I take issue with wacked-out mass murderers.
We need to focus on them, not an entire f*cking religion.

Quote:

Traditionally,
when thay say that,
thay have a sword against
some Christian 's neck,
and thay 've PROVEN on videotape, in living color,
that it is not a bluff.

And you watched it? You sick bastard.

Quote:

It is ONLY a religious war; nothing else.

this is rubbish.

Its a war to control oil, in which both sides are using religious dupes.

Steve 41oo wrote:

Quote:

It is ONLY a religious war; nothing else.

this is rubbish.

Its a war to control oil, in which both sides are using religious dupes.

If true, at least it's not a religious war over sand. That would be really stupid.

I am not a judge of what is true
nor false Islam, nor is that any of my business,
but I know that Atta led the 9/11 attacks
because he was a MOSLEM.

Does Islam say that the true believers should allow non-believers to enslave them and to exploit them?

The Middle East suffered for years under the colonialists from the Oil Cartel and the World Bank Zionists.
The poverty of the poor in the Middle East can be
directly traceable to colonialist domination.

Now, when the Muslims fight to preserve their lands and oil,
they are called terrorists.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I am not a judge of what is true
nor false Islam, nor is that any of my business,
but I know that Atta led the 9/11 attacks
because he was a MOSLEM.

Is it just me, or does that statement make absolutely no sense?

echi wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I am not a judge of what is true
nor false Islam, nor is that any of my business,
but I know that Atta led the 9/11 attacks
because he was a MOSLEM.

Is it just me, or does that statement make absolutely no sense?

What 's the problem ?
U think that if Atta had been Amish,
or a Quaker, or a Methodist,
he 'd have done the same thing ?
David

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I am not a judge of what is true
nor false Islam, nor is that any of my business,
but I know that Atta led the 9/11 attacks
because he was a MOSLEM.

Is it just me, or does that statement make absolutely no sense?

omsig is desperately worried that no one cares what he says

blatham wrote:

omsig is desperately worried that no one cares what he says

Blatham is desperately worried
that he will run out of ways to
be hopelessly foolish.

Does Islam say that the true believers should allow non-believers to enslave them and to exploit them? The Middle East suffered for years under the colonialists from the Oil Cartel and the World Bank Zionists. The poverty of the poor in the Middle East can be directly traceable to colonialist domination. Now, when the Muslims fight to preserve their lands and oil, they are called terrorists.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

echi wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I am not a judge of what is true
nor false Islam, nor is that any of my business,
but I know that Atta led the 9/11 attacks
because he was a MOSLEM.

Is it just me, or does that statement make absolutely no sense?

What 's the problem ?
U think that if Atta had been Amish,
or a Quaker, or a Methodist,
he 'd have done the same thing ?
David

Quote:

You can't judge who is a true Muslim,

That 's really none of my business
.

Quote:

and you believe that Atta was a Muslim
(because he said he was?).

Yes.
( U think he was IMPERSONATING a Moslem ?
He was really a Presbitarian ? )
Thru out my life,
when someone has identified himself
as being of some designated religion,
I have accepted that on both a prima facie
and a dispositive basis. He gets to choose that.

Quote:

Why do you take the word of murderers
over the word of non-murderers?

When thay explain the reason
thay thay committing murders and suicides,
whose last screamed words r " Alla AKBAR !!! ",
yeah, I 'll take their word for that,
the same as I accept the word of the Japanese Army
that thay were trying to subdue the world for their
" Son of Heaven " their Emperor.
David