1
   

Careless Nudity

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 09:33 am
Boy this is going fast..

makemeshiver33 wrote:
No, I never said.."Call Child protection because the child has seen the parent naked."

Yes you did... "My oldest son is 12, would it be appropriate for me to walk around naked in front of him? Noooo, it wouldn't. [..] If I was to do that, and people found out, the first thing they would do is place a call to Child protection services, and quite frankly, I wouldn't blame them."

makemeshiver33 wrote:
You had the decency and tact to leave the room? PFFT! I'm talking nudity Nimh, not eating dinner...

Eating dinner? I meant they could have the place by themselves so they could be together, duh... I was talking about giving them the opportunity to .. you know.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 09:40 am
blacksmithn wrote:
If that's all the described situation represents to you, then you'll never get the point.

Blacksmith, could you read my posts again please?

I have been clear what I am addressing here. I dont put much credence in the original post of this thread. A bunch of A2K'ers said it sounded incredible, so I'm not going into it much. What I specifically addressed was points made by posters whom I do take seriously - Ragman, first, Makemeshiver later.

They made two points, in the main, that I took issue with.

First issue.

Here's Ragman:

Ragman_orig wrote:
If you're being sexually intimate with this woman while in the home of this mother and her 3 minor kids, then you could be risking having the mother being reported to authorities for being an unfit mother. She can have her kids taken away from her and put in foster homes.


And here's MMS:

Makemeshiver wrote:
IMHO, You have no business being in her bed, naked or dressed, while those girls are home, I don't care what stage of the relationship you are in. Your not married to her, if you were...that might change up a few things, but not many.

I'd like to add this also, if I were her ex, I'd not only have her ass, but I'd have yours too, and custody of those girls.

Thats my first Shocked

Single mums can not have sex with their boyfriend in their own house, and if they do they can or should have her kids taken away from her?

Second issue.

Here's MMS:

makemeshiver wrote:
My oldest son is 12, would it be appropriate for me to walk around naked in front of him?

Noooo, it wouldn't. [..] If I was to do that, and people found out, the first thing they would do is place a call to Child protection services, and quite frankly, I wouldn't blame them.

That's my second Shocked

Having your kid see you walking around naked is good reason to call Child protection?

Those are my two issues, and no, I dont think there's anything "cosmopolitan" about being baffled by either; neither about thinking a single mum should be allowed to sleep with her boyfriend in her own home, nor about thinking that a kid seeing her mum naked is no reason to call in Child Protection.
0 Replies
 
makemeshiver33
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 09:56 am
Quote:
makemeshiver33 wrote:
No, I never said.."Call Child protection because the child has seen the parent naked."

Yes you did... "My oldest son is 12, would it be appropriate for me to walk around naked in front of him? Noooo, it wouldn't. [..] If I was to do that, and people found out, the first thing they would do is place a call to Child protection services, and quite frankly, I wouldn't blame them."

Nimh, I'm not talking a one time thing here. If I were to make it a habit out of it, to sit and watch the soaps naked, to fix dinner naked...run out in the yard naked...to strut around in full view any time I damn well pleased, Hell YEAH......I wouldn't blame them. Hell..someone get me some help. Especially if it were humialiting my child!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Were talking about a woman that displays her body freely, in front of anyone and everyone without any regard for her children or their feelings! Children do not have to be involved in the parents sex life.


makemeshiver33 wrote:
You had the decency and tact to leave the room? PFFT! I'm talking nudity Nimh, not eating dinner...

Eating dinner? I meant they could have the place by themselves so they could be together, duh... I was talking about giving them the opportunity to .. you know. Good for you. I'm glad that you had to spend time in your room so your mother could have a sex life. It not like she could have waited for you to go to bed, its not like she could have waited for you to be elsewhere. She involved you in her sexlife..thats great. I'm proud for you....I'm proud you had the decency to leave the room. It says alot about you...



Quote:
I have been clear what I am addressing here. I dont put much credence in the original post of this thread. A bunch of A2K'ers said it sounded incredible, so I'm not going into it much. What I specifically addressed was points made by posters whom I do take seriously - Ragman, first, Makemeshiver later.


Nimh..I've also have a respect for your post. But not this one.

You are missing the point.

What I'm saying is:

There is a time and place for everything. Even a mothers sex life. Children do not have any business being involved in it. It is none of their business.

Nudity: is not acceptable in the U.S. Again, there is a time and place for it. Nudity is not acceptable while your boyfriend is lying in bed, and children are in plain view. Even if he spent the night, FINE...but the bedroom should have been off limits. They knock, you walk out..shut the door behind you. PERIOD!

And if the mothers behavior is embarrassing to the girls, then it needs to be stopped. Were not talking about brand of clothing, were talking about a habit that is degrading to the girls., it embarrasses them, humiliates them. Its a repeated habit that they are uncomfortable with. It needs to stop. When it becomes a problem then it creates emotional abuse.

And..the actions of the mother are questionable in the least. The poster himself is putting himself in a situation that is not kosher here.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:00 am
Valhalla, although i'm not going to go back to read every post in the thread again, i don't know that anyone here has called you a crackpot. I did use the term crackpot, but it was in reference to the religiously perfervid, and was not a comment about you.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:03 am
This is going too fast for me.. Here I am still answering to your post before..

makemeshiver33 wrote:
Let me tell you something. There is a time and place for everything. I was the product of a divorced couple Nimh. When my mother divorced, she had boyfriends. But it was taken outside the home, or brought into our home when we went to stay with our father on the weekends. Us girls were not involved in her affairs. If we were, it was dinner, watch a movie..and they left. She even had a man live in our home for over a year. It come as a surprise to us, because we never knew he had been there until they married, and some years later she told us. We were not involved in her affairs in that manner. I do respect my mother for that much. She didn't involve us in her tit 4 tat.

So, you have different values than I do. I cant see a reason why I should have expected my mom to go off somewhere out when she wanted to be with her boyfriend ("be", as in, including sleeping together). Dinner and a movie is always nice, but of course she could sleep with her own boyfriend in her own house. I didnt and dont see the problem in that, and I dont see it as involving a "tit 4 tat" (?).

Personally, I in turn would have found it rather weird and disturbing if I were to find out my mother had lived with a man for over a year and never told us - I think I would feel seriously insulted (distrusted, detached, etc).

So, we obviously have different takes on this. Well, to each his own. The problem I have is where you say that the other's values (that would be my mom's, then, for example, re having her boyfriend visit for more than dinner) is a good reason for the other parent to take custody away (see your quote in my post above).

makemeshiver33 wrote:
Nope..you will never get the point. What is acceptable as the norm in one country, doesn't make it acceptable here. It is not acceptable.


Well, it seems like you have some fellow-Americans disagreeing with you even here on this thread.

makemeshiver33 wrote:
Nope..you will never get the point. What is acceptable as the norm in one country, doesn't make it acceptable here. It is not acceptable. If it were, then people wouldn't be put in jail for public nudity or indecent exposure.

Ehmm.. how is your kid seeing you naked in your own home in any way comparable to "public nudity or indecent exposure"?

makemeshiver33 wrote:
As for the Tart statement...YEA! Nimh, different aspects of a childs life bring on different standards of values/morals on down the road. If a child watches the parents smoke crack, what are the chances that child will grow up to smoke crack, because it was acceptable in the home, so why shouldn't it be acceptable for them to do it also? Mom done it! [..]

These two men, also were introduced to dope by their mother, was that acceptable? Nooo

These two men, are so screwed up today, they don't know right from wrong. One has been in and out of prison so many times its crazy. He's also a pedifile, and a major crackhead. The other son, he's crazy and a methhead...Dope and sex rule these two mens lives.

Would thier life be considered normal? If they had been taught values, and some decency...they may not have turned out to be the thugs they are now.

So now a kid seeing her mom naked is comparable with her smoking crack in front of him, or sharing dope with him?

And seeing your mom naked will lead you to pederasty, drug addiction and prison?

Seriously...

I would have thought that there were a bunch of other, far more important issues involved in how those sons turned out, there.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:07 am
We seem to be talking at cross purposes here. You want to extrapolate from the scenario as set forth that this is instead some innocent, wonderful, God made us naked for a reason, bonding experience, well go right ahead.

On the other hand, as posited here, with mom parading around nude in public view, with mom choosing to involve her children in her sex life and with the children clearly expressing their embarassment and humiliation with the whole situation, then yeah, I'd say there's a big problem here. And if you can't grasp this, then I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:11 am
I had this one still in an open window, forgot it... basically the same point again.

flushd wrote:
mom boinking her bf in the next room is at least uncomfortable for some.

Kids dont like the idea of their parents having sex, period. They feel uncomfortable about that, yes - who wants to think of their mom having sex?

Yet it is inevitable that your parents are going to have sex - together as long as they're married, and with their new partner once they no longer are.

That seems like a fact of life to me. What is the alternative suggestion? That mother leaves the house whenever she starts cuddling with her boyfriend after hours and it rolls into more? Because she cant be doing it in the room next to her child, even with the doors closed? Where'd she go? A hotel? First arrange a babysit every time?

Way I see it, who'd want to put one's single mum to that kind of trouble? A single mom's life is stressed enough as it is, and love is especially hard to find if you're one..
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:11 am
Re: Clarification
See, this is why you have legitimacy problems, valhalla.

This:

valhalla wrote:
If I stay at her place we do not go to bed before her kids are asleep. This is still relatively new for me with her too. In the morning my GF went to make coffee and brought it back to the room. At some point 2 of the kids were knocking at the door and she let them in. I had not gotten up yet and felt extremely uncomfortable with them coming in even though I was totally covered up and my GF was in her robe. She constantly assured me that the kids were ok with this. Evidently this kind of thing was not new to them. Regardless I did not feel comfortable with it.


is easy to imagine and pretty much exactly what I suspected actually happened. However, in your first post, this is how you described it:

Quote:
In her house she walks around naked at times in front of her 3 girls aged 9, 10 and 14. Her 10 year old was uncomfortable with this when I was also there and lying in her bed where I could see. Her daughter was covering my eyes.


(Emphases mine.)

There is a clear implication here that your GF was walking around NAKED -- not in a robe -- in front of her two daughters, while you were in bed watching.

Why did the daughter cover your eyes if your GF was wearing a robe?

Because your writing remains unclear, I'm not completely sure if you were correcting the record re: the walking around naked in front of the kids with you in the bed a la correcting the record re: the stepfather, or if this is a new incident that occurred this morning.

At the very least, the lack of clarity is contributing to the responses you're getting, Valhalla.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:13 am
blacksmithn wrote:
On the other hand, as posited here, with mom parading around nude in public view, with mom choosing to involve her children in her sex life and with the children clearly expressing their embarassment and humiliation with the whole situation, then yeah, I'd say there's a big problem here./quote]

It's not clear if that's actually what happened though, blacksmithn.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:27 am
Surprisingly (to me at least), I'm smack on the middle of the fence on this one. Having been raised with a strong Puritan background, running naked into the living room in front of my children while my naked boyfriend looks on from the bedroom is beyond my imagination. Running naked out to the car is pretty high on my bizarre scale too.

On the other hand, I find myself leaning on the Nimh, stuh side of the fence when it comes to parent's rights and calling DCFS.

The original post discusses a dilemma in regards to nudity. I don't see how these two individuals can cross the gap they have in how they perceive nudity. My more general take is that, while perhaps unfortunate, any idiot can be a parent and running naked through the living room might be idiotic, I don't think it's abusive.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:33 am
While I look forward to getting the whole story from Valhalla, I think the reactions here are themselves instructive.

Mitigating circumstances have come up for just about every single thing (assuming for a minute that any of it is true) -- she's in an isolated rural area where nobody can see her unless they happened to be walking up her road. That puts things like running from her car (didn't see that one) and not closing curtains in a different light, for those of us who assume an urban context. It's not unreasonable for her to assume that nobody would see her.

The "naked in front of kids with boyfriend watching and traumatized kids" has become clothed in a robe with the kids totally fine with it.

I don't know which version is TRUE, but it's exactly why I get antsy about the idea of child protective services being called.
0 Replies
 
makemeshiver33
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 10:53 am
Quote:
Kids dont like the idea of their parents having sex, period. They feel uncomfortable about that, yes - who wants to think of their mom having sex?


Nope, I'm 36 and don't want to discuss sex with my mother. It still just grosses me out at the thought....

Quote:
That seems like a fact of life to me. What is the alternative suggestion? That mother leaves the house whenever she starts cuddling with her boyfriend after hours and it rolls into more? Because she cant be doing it in the room next to her child, even with the doors closed? Where'd she go? A hotel? First arrange a babysit every time?

Way I see it, who'd want to put one's single mum to that kind of trouble? A single mom's life is stressed enough as it is, and love is especially hard to find if you're one..


Nimh, your trying to make more out of my statement than is there. Hell, I'm all for sex, love it. But I don't involve my children in it. Its my business, I don't advertise it to them, nor do I parade around in front of them naked, just because I feel the need to be free. In all honesty, there are times I'd give my eyeteeth to pull all my clothes off and lay on the couch, but I don't, because it would put my kids in an uncomfortable situation, embarrass them, and be totally out of sinc with my nature.

And yes, a single mothers life is hard. I remember the period of time my mother struggled with us alone. I haven't forgotten that. But she had enough respect for us, that she didn't involve us in her affairs. She didn't walk around naked while her boyfriend was in the bedroom.

And the point about the dope. Nimh, all I'm trying to convey is what is taught to children in the homes, doesn't necessarily make it right. That I was trying to point out to you, that parents behavior can inflict different ideas in children on what is right and what is wrong, and can lead to trouble years later for them to have to endure. That we have a responsiblity to our children, to teach them a correct set of morals/values to live by. Whether we agree with what level of morality each parent has or not, in society...there is a set standard, some conform to that, some don't. It doesn't mean I'm an advocate for CPS being called anytime I disagree with someone. Its the emotional abuse that pisses me off that children have to endure. I lived through a world of emotional abuse, I detest it, it pisses me off to no end that a child has to suffer at the hands of a parent. You have to remember, children didn't ask to be brought into this world, they are here by our choice.

You don't agree with Cjhsa, thats fine. I happen to agree with him. My boys are both avid shooters, along with me. Its considered the norm to our family, its not embarrassing, it doesn't humiliate my children.

blacksmithn
Quote:
On the other hand, as posited here, with mom parading around nude in public view, with mom choosing to involve her children in her sex life and with the children clearly expressing their embarassment and humiliation with the whole situation, then yeah, I'd say there's a big problem here. And if you can't grasp this, then I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.


EXACTLY!

Soz
Quote:
While I look forward to getting the whole story from Valhalla, I think the reactions here are themselves instructive.

Mitigating circumstances have come up for just about every single thing (assuming for a minute that any of it is true) -- she's in an isolated rural area where nobody can see her unless they happened to be walking up her road. That puts things like running from her car (didn't see that one) and not closing curtains in a different light, for those of us who assume an urban context. It's not unreasonable for her to assume that nobody would see her.

The "naked in front of kids with boyfriend watching and traumatized kids" has become clothed in a robe with the kids totally fine with it.

I don't know which version is TRUE, but it's exactly why I get antsy about the idea of child protective services being called.


Soz, your the one that said this raises a zillion questions....

I didn't say I'd call CPS, I said, "I'd have her ass, and the BF's." Meaning, that if I was her ex and found out, I'd have a chit chat with them. If that failed to work, and the mother's nudity still was undaunted, I'd then go as far as to pursue custody.

Emotional Abuse, by witnessing the mother naked. No ! But having to endure repeated humiliation because of her nakedness, YES.

JPB
Quote:
The original post discusses a dilemma in regards to nudity. I don't see how these two individuals can cross the gap they have in how they perceive nudity. My more general take is that, while perhaps unfortunate, any idiot can be a parent and running naked through the living room might be idiotic, I don't think it's abusive.


I never said it was abusive. I said that the repeated humiliation, embarrassment isn't stopped, is/can be considered emotional abuse.








Nimh, Lets just agree to disagree. I don't see your point of view, nor do you see mine. Lets leave it at that. Quite frankly, I am tired of argueing my viewpoint with you, because its clear that you won't see it & I won't see yours.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:04 am
One discomfort for me is that the girlfriend is carefree with the nudity together with not having curtains; is so carefree that she'll go outside to the car nude in full public view. I wouldn't be calling authorities about it, but the elements of non-privacy re the transparency to the driveby public is quirky to me. I think she's missing a synapse there.

Another discomfort for me is her lack of bedroom privacy - I'm a fan of door shutting.

On being nude (routinely) with three maturing daughters in the house - given there were curtains and with a man not there - it seems imposing of one's body to me personally, but I don't think of it as abusive exactly.

On having the boyfriend stay over and having sex with him while the daughters are in the house - I've mixed feelings, but mostly agree with nimh on it. If she is having many boyfriends staying over, that would be a poor example, but that's really another issue.

On having the boyfriend stay over and also parading around nude with the bf in bed and the door open (if that is what happened) - that seems to be taking sex out of the privacy mode and I think it's inappropriate.

Whatever, I agree with all about apparent incompatibility.
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:11 am
not to close off discussion
ok.. (not to close off discussion) but, the topic is well discussed..and all the tangents have been well discussed. Now, what happened to the author who posted this?

Let's see if they come back and face the music. Or, will they morph into yet another newbie nick and ask another sexual question for some voyeuristic thrill.
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:13 am
One time I was walking down the street and I looked up and saw a woman standing naked in front of an open window putting on her nightgown. Being a guy I looked. As soon as she had her nightgown on she screamed out the window, "YOU PERVERT! YOU F'ING ASS HOLE!"

I replied, "Me? You're the one standing naked in front of an open window!"

She told me she was going to call the cops. I told her I'd wait until they arrived and informed her there were laws against flashing in front of an open window. If the cops came I would be forced to press charges. Needless to say, she didn't call the cops and I walked away.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:15 am
Did anyone see this post?

It was kind of in the middle of things and I don't see much reference to it.

It really reinforces my initial take that Valhalla was exaggerating things in his first post to get a sympathetic reaction, ("Yeah, she's wrong, you're right"). Then when it got a REALLY strong reaction, he took things in the other direction with a post titled "Clarification" ("Uh wait it's not that bad, she had a robe on, the kids didn't care, she's in the country...")

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2237054#2237054
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:17 am
thanks sozobe ...reading it now
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:28 am
Sozobe, hard to tell, there may be different incidents..
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:34 am
blacksmithn wrote:
We seem to be talking at cross purposes here. You want to extrapolate from the scenario as set forth that this is instead some innocent, wonderful, God made us naked for a reason, bonding experience, well go right ahead.

Huh?

I responded to specific points made by two of the respondents in the thread, yeah.

The case at hand being what it may, they made general value statements about what should or should not be allowed for a parent to do.

I disagreed with those statements and argued with them.

And?

makemeshiver33 wrote:
Good for you. I'm glad that you had to spend time in your room so your mother could have a sex life. It not like she could have waited for you to go to bed, its not like she could have waited for you to be elsewhere. She involved you in her sexlife..thats great. I'm proud for you....I'm proud you had the decency to leave the room. It says alot about you...

Oh, bollocks makemeshiver. I'm sorry, but what a piece of **** post is this. And she "involved me in her sex life"??

Look, I'll lay it out for you.

Its evening time. Family is at home. Her boyfriend visited like, once in two or three weeks or something.

We know he's coming round that night, so when he arrives, sometime mid-evening, we retire to our rooms a little earlier than, you know, the other 28 days in the month. Just cause we think its nice if they have some space as well.

Yeah, I was terribly emotionally abused by my scrupleless mother. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 11:36 am
Yeah -- and that's what I said earlier re: lack of clarity in Valhalla's writing. ("Hard to tell.") At the very least, though, starting with the "Clarification" title, the tone of that latest post is very much "whoa back up it isn't so bad..."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

A good cry on the train - Discussion by Joe Nation
I want to run away. I can't do this anymore. Help? - Question by unknownpersonuser
Please help, should I call CPS?? - Question by butterflyring
I Don't Know What To Do or Think Anymore - Question by RunningInPlace
Flirting? I Say Yes... - Question by LST1969
My wife constantly makes the same point. - Question by alwayscloudy
Cellphone number - Question by Smiley12
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Careless Nudity
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/04/2025 at 08:16:41