YAY!!!!!!

Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

0 Replies

FreeDuck wrote:

Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

Let's make it 20!

0 Replies

blatham wrote:

Tico said
Quote:
And how utterly predictable that you would not view Zarqawi's death as a good thing.

I've addressed your failures in integrity before. Here's another. Of course I've not expressed that anywhere and don't hold it so.

So you agree with me that Zarqawi's death is a good thing?

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

FreeDuck wrote:
Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

Let's make it 20!

Maybe next time they take out one of these leaders, they could slit his throat in the public square! Yay!

0 Replies

Well, some kind of primitive-medieval spectacle certainly will entertain some simple minds.

0 Replies

Freeduck,

No, that would be barbarous. No civilized society in the 21st century would behead a criminal in public, much less on television for the world watch. Who would publicly stone a woman to death for having an affair, or condemn a man to death for changing his religion? Is exploding bombs in public places with the intent to kill and maim as many civilians as possible worse than celebrating the death of the architect of such operations?

Death can't be avoided, but it can serve a good and useful purpose. The enemy say that they believe that they will go directly to Paradise if they die killing infidels. That justifies teenagers to commit suicide at the direction of creatures like Zarkawi, and probably his successor. Why weep for them, they got what they wanted. Now, lets go out and help some more terrorists to their stated desire to die for their faith.

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

blatham wrote:
Tico said
Quote:
And how utterly predictable that you would not view Zarqawi's death as a good thing.

I've addressed your failures in integrity before. Here's another. Of course I've not expressed that anywhere and don't hold it so.

So you agree with me that Zarqawi's death is a good thing?

Of course it is a good thing insofar as someone's death might be considered a good thing.

0 Replies

FreeDuck wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

Let's make it 20!

Maybe next time they take out one of these leaders, they could slit his throat in the public square! Yay!

That's what they do. Not us. We prefer bombs and guns and giving them a chance to surrender and turn themselves in.

Zarkawi's death is definitely a reason to celebrate. Just as osama's will be someday. They are evil men who deserve, and ask for, no mercy.

You are free to mourn their deaths if that's what you choose to do, but allow me the freedom to celebrate their death. That's what I choose to do.

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

Just as osama's will be someday.

You mean Osama been Forgotten?

I don't actually bear you any ill will, and would not want to see you suffer--so i advise that you do not hold your breath.

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

You are free to mourn their deaths if that's what you choose to do, but allow me the freedom to celebrate their death. That's what I choose to do.

Yes, because the only alternative to celebrating is mourning. You may celebrate their deaths -- that is what they do too. I may find it repulsive that you do so, especially considering how many others died in the process.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
Just as osama's will be someday.

You mean Osama been Forgotten?

I don't actually bear you any ill will, and would not want to see you suffer--so i advise that you do not hold your breath.

Well, he can't live forever...

0 Replies

FreeDuck wrote:

McGentrix wrote:

You are free to mourn their deaths if that's what you choose to do, but allow me the freedom to celebrate their death. That's what I choose to do.

Yes, because the only alternative to celebrating is mourning. You may celebrate their deaths -- that is what they do too. I may find it repulsive that you do so, especially considering how many others died in the process.

You should tell the person twisting your arm to read this thread (the title was YAY!!!!! for goodness sakes) to stop twisting so hard if you find the material within so repulsive.

0 Replies

blatham wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
Tico said
Quote:
And how utterly predictable that you would not view Zarqawi's death as a good thing.

I've addressed your failures in integrity before. Here's another. Of course I've not expressed that anywhere and don't hold it so.

So you agree with me that Zarqawi's death is a good thing?

Of course it is a good thing insofar as someone's death might be considered a good thing.

So what was your intended point on the last page where you allege us "turkeys.. are being jerked around by" our "chain"?

I mean, you concede Zarqawi's death is a good thing, and you understood (as did every thinking individual considering the subject) that his death would cause another to rise up as his replacement. Are you suggesting that the replacement is a creation of the Bush Administration, or do you think we ought to just ignore the new arrival to the head of the snake? Is this just another instance of your continuing obsession, and you think the identification of the new head of AQ in Iraq is just another instance of the Bush Administration's Orwellian control over the citizens of the US? What exactly is your point, since it's obviously too nuanced for me to glean it unaided?

Zarqawi's death, good ... identifying his replacement, bad. Rolling Eyes

0 Replies

What better place to express my repulsion?

0 Replies

FreeDuck wrote:

Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

Yes, we should ignore people who try to kill us. Tell me about a past war in which most of the citizens didn't want to win, and applaud moments of success. You seem to be putting forth the idea that its unenlightened to want to succeed in a war.

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

Well, some kind of primitive-medieval spectacle certainly will entertain some simple minds.

Of course the European powers never fight wars, and if they did fight one, they would never be so primitive as to hope to win.

0 Replies

Brandon9000 wrote:

FreeDuck wrote:
Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

Yes, we should ignore people who try to kill us. Tell me about a past war in which most of the citizens didn't want to win, and applaud moments of success. You seem to be putting forth the idea that its unenlightened to want to succeed in a war.

Again with the false dichotomy. No wonder you are so happy, your infallible logic dictates that there is no other possible reaction than unfettered glee.

0 Replies

FreeDuck wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
Fourteen pages of celebrating death.

Yes, we should ignore people who try to kill us. Tell me about a past war in which most of the citizens didn't want to win, and applaud moments of success. You seem to be putting forth the idea that its unenlightened to want to succeed in a war.

Again with the false dichotomy. No wonder you are so happy, your infallible logic dictates that there is no other possible reaction than unfettered glee.

Alright, I won't put words in your mouth. It has always been customary in every place and time to be happy when you achieve a moment of victory in a war, especially against a brutal foe intent on your destruction. What, then, exactly, was your point?

0 Replies

That celebrating death, taking pleasure in it, is repulsive.

0 Replies

FreeDuck wrote:

That celebrating death, taking pleasure in it, is repulsive.

Only if you you think that every life, no matter how bad, is worth saving.

Zarqawi was a bad bad person and I'm not ashamed to say I am glad he is dead.

0 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know