1
   

YAY!!!!!!

 
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 10:40 am
You can compare it to known relatives, if you have them and if they are willing to submit a sample.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 10:41 am
I understand that--what i was looking for was precisely what the source is alleged to be.
0 Replies
 
Magginkat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 11:20 am
SANITY CLAWS by Underling
Americans kill one legged Jordanian again,
maybe for the last time
8 June 2006

Well Messers Bush and Blair are all aglow today. Once again they've killed off the one legged Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. This time they may not be able to resurrect Zarqawi so we can all look forward to a new face on the modern day wanted posters. Who knows, perhaps the next one will be a Canadian, eh. Either way this latest announcement of Zarqawi's death comes at excellent time for G.W. Bush.

http://www.mytown.ca/sanityclaws/
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 11:34 am
Setanta wrote:
Continuing reference is made to DNA testing. Precisely what does anyone allege a sample can be compared to? Did Zarquawi spit into a cup for the US Forces at some time in the past, and they just forgot to tell us? How can you establish the identity of a corpse with DNA testing if you don't already have a reliable sample of DNA from the purported victim?


why do you hate America? Do you WANT your head sawed off by a terrorist?
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 11:42 am
Setanta wrote:
Continuing reference is made to DNA testing. Precisely what does anyone allege a sample can be compared to? Did Zarquawi spit into a cup for the US Forces at some time in the past, and they just forgot to tell us? How can you establish the identity of a corpse with DNA testing if you don't already have a reliable sample of DNA from the purported victim?


They just called up Monica.
She was happy to be of any assistance.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 12:00 pm
The only kind of news that would be good news is not more bombs or death but PEACE. PEACE is what Americans and the world want to see. Everything else is the same old bullshit and lies. Understanding, knowledge, empathy and diplomacy when those things are non-existent in the world theater we have ****. Intill WE put OUR foot foward on this the worst side of human nature will control our fate and good people cannot be happy.
0 Replies
 
WhoodaThunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 12:29 pm
Amigo wrote:
Understanding, knowledge, empathy and diplomacy when those things are non-existent in the world theater we have ****. Intill WE put OUR foot foward on this the worst side of human nature will control our fate and good people cannot be happy.


Huh? Been studying from the GWB Lil' Book of Impromptu Sentence Construction, Amigo?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 01:05 pm
How many times do I have to see that damn head on T.V.?
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:23 pm
Dilbert's creator, Scott Adams, is celebrating along with (most) of the rest of us:

Quote:
Today is my birthday, and the first thing I always do on this day is check the headlines to see if anyone ruined my calendar date. But no! The news is that the Americans just dropped a bomb on al-Zarqawi, the head of Al-Qaida in Iraq.

This is a classic yet rare win-win-win-win scenario. The new Iraqi government is happy because he's dead. The Americans are happy because he's dead. Even his friends and coworkers are happy. Al-Qaida issued a statement saying, "We want to give you the joyous news of the martyrdom of the mujahed sheik Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The death of our leaders is life for us. It will only increase our persistence in continuing holy war so that the word of God will be supreme."

And best of all, according to his religion, he's in paradise deflowering virgins as we speak. I believe he gets 72 of them, and by my calculation he's already worked his way through 7 or 8, depending on how much paperwork there is in the afterlife before you can get busy.

I'm also happy for the pilot or drone operator that dropped the bomb on him. That guy has a story to tell. "You know that al-Zarqawi terrorist guy? I killed him on Scott Adams' birthday."

http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 05:47 am
It is good news that the religious fanatic has been eliminated. Anyone who kills innocent civilians is a disgusting criminal.
.
He was obsessed with one goal: to equal the number of innocent Iraqi civilians who had been killed by the US military. That number varies from 20 000 to 38 000.
.
He had a long way to go; luckily he will be unable to continue his inhuman task.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 08:45 pm
Here we go. AP report...
Quote:
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- The new leader of al-Qaida in Iraq vowed to avenge the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and threatened horrific attacks ''in the coming days,'' according to a Web statement Tuesday -- the first from the new terrorist leader.

''Don't be overcome with joy about killing our sheik Abu Musab, God bless his soul, because he has left lions behind him,'' it said.

The statement was posted a day after the group announced that a man identified by the nom de guerre Abu Hamza al-Muhajer would succeed the Jordanian-born militant as its leader. Al-Zarqawi died June 7 in a U.S. airstrike on a safehouse in Baqouba, north of Baghdad.

''You crusaders, what will happen in the coming days is something that will turn your children's hair white -- battles that will reveal the falsehood of (your) might, the weakness of your soldiers and your lies,'' the statement said.

The statement, posted on a Web site that frequently airs militant messages, appeared with the black banner of al-Qaida in Iraq and photos of al-Zarqawi alive and dead. Its authenticity could not be verified.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Al-Zarqawis-Successor.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 02:46 am
Well, oh golly goodness. Who could have predicted this headline and this briefing?
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/world/middleeast/16iraq.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

So just when the fuk are you turkeys going to wise up on how you are being jerked around by your chain?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 03:08 am
Re: YAY!!!!!!
McGentrix wrote:
AIRSTRIKE KILLS AL-ZARQAWI

What a wonderful way to wake up in the morning.

True,
but I can 't help but wonder:
if we knew where he was ( as we did )
then wud we have been better off in capturing him alive,
to encourage him to reveal the best secrets of Qaeda ?

I gotta believe he 'd have been a treasure trove of good information.

Was there too much danger of his escape from the area ?

Maybe we cud not get troops there,
on the ground, fast enuf ?

David
0 Replies
 
WhoodaThunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 07:20 am
blatham wrote:
So just when the fuk are you turkeys going to wise up on how you are being jerked around by your chain?


A chain would be unnecessarily cumbersome for a turkey's small frame. Shouldn't a soft nylon filament suffice?
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 09:47 am
So a capo gets promoted to Boss, and now is in the center of the bullseye. We'll kill him to in time, and his successor, and the successor following if necessary. The enemy does not have unlimited resources, but we do so long as we aren't too tired to lift a sword.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 10:28 am
Sword?! And you wonder why folks think there is a big pump pushing military-grade helium up your ass?

The issue here is the transparent and purposive manipulation of your (ie you as citizens) perceptions and ideas. I described precisely how this was managed in the case of Zarqawi (and elsewhere) and pointed to the near certainty that a new demon would be pushed forward to replace him. And there he is, in a framed color photo no less. Equally as predictable is that a bunch of you guys will just suck this all in as if Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch and Haditha etc had never happened. You share a deep brotherhood with all those families who lived around Bergen-Belsen who did NOT want to know what that smoke meant.
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 10:55 am
I doubt that anyone ever believed that killing Bin Ladin, or Zarquai, would bring an immediate end to the dangers posed by radical Islamic terrorists. When leader falls, he is replaced by another. Killing Hitler in 1940 wouldn't have ended the war in Europe either.

Both Bin Ladin and Zarquai were important instigators of thousands of murders. They aren't so important now. Will their replacements be as effective? Only time will tell, but attrition in small organizations more often results in less capable leadership. The replacements become targets of an increasingly effective system for destroying them. They will die in their turn. The sooner the barrel is emptied and the futililty of adopting terrorist tactics is accepted, the sooner this war will be over.

Those who believed our efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq were something akin to conventional warfare in the 20th century, rather than as a protracted campaign more similar to the Cold War, were mistaken. This is much closer to the effort to break the back of organized crime than it is to defeating the Axis. It will be long and the results will be ambigous in detail though the enemy will eventually be so depleted that terrorist tactics will peter out.
0 Replies
 
WhoodaThunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 10:57 am
blatham wrote:
You share a deep brotherhood with all those families who lived around Bergen-Belsen who did NOT want to know what that smoke meant.


Save the theatrics for your paying audiences, Blatham.

A better example of turning a blind eye to genocide would be the do-nothing stance of the European community during the Serbian-led slaughter of the 90s before the Americans had to play World Cop for those lacking the wherewithal/balls.

To equate complicity with Nazi slaughter to your contrived thought manipulation conspiracy is oddly bizarre.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 11:01 am
blatham wrote:
...
The issue here is the transparent and purposive manipulation of your (ie you as citizens) perceptions and ideas. I described precisely how this was managed in the case of Zarqawi (and elsewhere) and pointed to the near certainty that a new demon would be pushed forward to replace him. And there he is, in a framed color photo no less. Equally as predictable is that a bunch of you guys will just suck this all in as if Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch and Haditha etc had never happened. You share a deep brotherhood with all those families who lived around Bergen-Belsen who did NOT want to know what that smoke meant.


No, blatham, that's your issue. The real issue is identified by Asherman. As far as your prediction that a new head of AQ in Iraq would be identified ... how prescient of you. And how utterly predictable that you would not view Zarqawi's death as a good thing.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 11:06 am
Tico said
Quote:
And how utterly predictable that you would not view Zarqawi's death as a good thing.

I've addressed your failures in integrity before. Here's another. Of course I've not expressed that anywhere and don't hold it so.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » YAY!!!!!!
  3. » Page 7
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 01:15:22