His answer to Point # 2
2. There are not "spikes" in the 20th century. There are periods of warming. If you bothered to read even half the crap you post you would have known this. Where is your citation for 5 times the CO2 today vs the early part of the century?
A little hint for you Bernard. Anthrogenic CO2 doesn't make up the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere. Another hint - temperature doesn't increase at the same rate as CO2 concentrations
SO2 acts to cool the earth. That is why we had cooling in the mid 20th century. 2 large volcanic eruptions increased the SO2.
Actually, the surface temperatures are slightly warmer than most of the computer models predicted they would be.
Readers will note carefully that he veered away from the basic question as soon as possible. He was evidently scared to death of it.
Note My point #2.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point # 2
It is accepted by all, even the global warming hysterics, that the surface temperatures in the Twentieth Century shows two spikes. One in the early part of the Century and the second after 1975. Given the accepted fact that the CO2 emissions, which the Global Warming Hysterics blame for warming, were only one fifth as high in the early part of the century with a spike in the temperatures, and then five times higher in the latter part of the century, why has the surface temperature in the latter part of the century not been higher?
Can you answer this, Mr. Parados
***********************************************************
First of all, the word spikes is not necessary, periods of warming will do.
Secondly,in the third line, he hurries away from the question. Why did the surface tempearature increase almost as fast from 1910 to 1945 as it did from 1975 to 2000?
He does not answer that except with a vague allusion( AS USUAL HE GIVES NO REFERENCES TO SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS) to two large volcanic eruptions increasing the SO2--This is just not enough according to all the studies to have caused the extent of the increase from 1910 to 1945( I will show this with scientific reference and the So2 allusion made by Mr, Parados as causes is simply incorrect( I will show this with scientific references( which he, Mr.Parados, asking me to take his word for it-LOLLOLLOL--will not do)
First, If Mr. Parados can reference Barnett et. al. "Detection and Attribution of Recent Climate Change"
http://ams.allenpress,com
he would find that all of the twentieth century's temperature increase has occurred abruptly within two time periods from 1910 to 1945 and from 1975 to 2000. Rere
The same article notes that while 1975 t0 2000 fits well within the concerns of the envrionmental hystericsm the time period from 1910 to 1945 is harder to align with the human emission of grfeenhouse gases SINCE THE CONCENTRATION AND INCREASE IN THE EARLY PART OF THE CENTURY WAS S L I G H T( I will give evidence below)
But, first, a reference for Mr. Parados( if he is able to understand it).
"Global and hemispheric temperature anomalies-land and marine instrumental records"
Global temoerature 1856-2000
http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/temp/jonescru/jones.html