My first visit to the USA (2. Albuquerque)

I dunno, Walter, I haven't chased it down, but you invited people to this thread - or was it another thread, this is getting confusing - with that photo. I didn't post that, it was your invitation. I just saw it an hour or two ago. Don't remember reposting the photo in any response. Perhaps, but don't remember doing that. Er, just to clarify. I think the invite photo is still out there. Whatever. With all this hazzerai I may even be able to grow fond of the photo. Give me a few days on that.

0 Replies

ossobuco wrote:

I dunno, Walter, I haven't chased it down, but you invited people to this thread - or was it another thread, this is getting confusing - with that photo. I didn't post that, it was your invitation. I

ossobuco wrote:

Walter Hinteler wrote:
You'll recognise not only known

Edit (Moderator): Image removed due to member request

but also "disguised" people

This may be the worst photo of me ever. I'd appreciate it if you can request that it is deleted, Walter, since you did not ask ok's first.

I've never invited anyone with any photo on any thread here or elswhere to lokk at any of my threads.

What I di here, was linking (words, in blue) to that thread and generally writing (on all the threads with photos from about Chicago/Albuwuerque/NM) that other photos were on the other threads.

I've really liked to share my impressions and photos and never thought to neither to insult someone with them nor start such discussions.

As said already yesterday, I'm not going to post any of my photos here anymore but only send them private email email or burnt on cd's/dvd's on demand.

I just can say that I'm awfully sorry about this.

0 Replies

Hey, guys, calm down. Aren't we getting just a bit too super-sensitive here?

I think Walter's and other folks' pictures are some of the best bits of A2K

I appreciate all the time & trouble Walter goes to, to bring us a variety of interesting travelogues. What a shame it would be, if that were to cease.

So, could we reconsider, please?

0 Replies

Oh, good grief. Certainly I do too.

0 Replies

I certainly might post the one or other 'neutral' photo here in future, but definately none from a meeting or "A2K-member-related".

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I certainly might post the one or other 'neutral' photo here in future, but definately none from a meeting or "A2K-member-related".

Everyone take a wee bromide.

Surely LANDSCAPES are safe?

:wink:

0 Replies

dlowan wrote:

Surely LANDSCAPES are safe?

:wink:

sure in the background behind the a2k crowd

0 Replies

I dunno. EhBeth may have ruled those out too. Though she and I, when we aren't hissyfitting, both like cityscapes.

0 Replies

McTag wrote:

msolga wrote:
McTag! Is that you?

Well it sure ain't Clark Gable.

Hey, Clark aint got nothing on you, McTag!

It's just that, for ages & ages, I sort of saw you as a sort of chunky Van Morrison person! (Blame that avatar!) You actually look much better than that! :wink:

0 Replies

I own sole rights over McTag marketing. Swooning aussie ladies have to apply for access via McTagmark Trading ltd.

0 Replies

Some pics now, which hopefully don't violate any guidelines (present and future), don't show any persons - especially no A2K'ers - either without given allowance or just being part of public and thus not related to any restrictions (at least according any European law).

Oops - hoping that was it.

0 Replies

These are all flowers in Dian and dys' garden, a garden, created by dys on desert soil with much effort and difficulties, flowers, the two can really be proud of having cultivated: