6
   

Immigration and Racism in Britain and USA

 
 
herberts
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 05:33 am
snood...
Quote:
These naybobs of negativism can't ever sway me from saluting our visionary President for carrying to fruition his strategy for victory in the Middle East!!


Wow! And I though I[/u] was the token nazi here! Shocked Looks like I've got some stiff competition! http://www.xtrememass.com/forum//images/smilies/biggrin.gif

You've just soiled yourself, snood. If you were white and called 'Herbert' you would right now be in line to receive every insult and abuse that these simpering leftwing ideologues could dream up to throw at you.
0 Replies
 
herberts
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 05:50 am
Francis - as always these stats are pitched in such a way as to favour the leftwing view of a One World paradise with no national borders.

Reading the report I was immediately struck by the gushing and boastful attitude of the authors about just how wonderful it is that the UK government has engineered a situation of such broad and vast diversity of Third World immigrant newcomers.

This attitude is in diametric contradiction of the sentiments held by conservative Britons who wish nothing less than that their homeland remain solidly 'British' with a minimum of imported Third World foreigners living amongst them.

As for the stats concerning 'German' and 'Irish' immigration - give me a break! Is anyone fooled into thinking these numbers refer to Irish people and Germans? These figures refer to Third World immigrants having gained access to Britain via the backdoor of Ireland and Germany.

I believe this 'diversity' of Third World immigrants now encamped upon British soil in their seething millions is a treasonable offence for which the politicians responsible should be strung up from the highest yardarms.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 06:04 am
German builders heading to the UK
0 Replies
 
kitchenpete
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 06:49 am
Merci mon ami cosmopolitan!

KP
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 06:50 am
herberts wrote:
Nationalism will always re-assert itself eventually

Nationalism didnt even exist until a few centuries ago.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 06:59 am
kitchenpete wrote:
Merci mon ami cosmopolitan!

KP


Mais il n'y a pas de quoi, Pierre de la Cuisine!
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:13 am
herberts wrote:
Referring to Pakistanis and subcontinental Indians as 'Asians' is a silly affectation which has been promoted into common usage in the UK only as a direct result of the term 'Paki' having become stigmatised as a term of abuse and derision.


But it was a term of abuse and derision to begin with.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:16 am
Who cares? I'm a gringo, a honky, a whitey, "bigot" and "racist" according to the left wing here on A2K. BFD.
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:35 am
Oh really? Let me find those who called you the former three and I'll report them.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:40 am
Why ignore the last two? Hmmmmm?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:47 am
Because Wolf values the truth.

Which is why he knows that the President has a clear vision of the path to victory in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:50 am
Wow, a troll conspiracy. What a joke.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 07:51 am
You slur the President by characterizing those who support his clear path to victory in Iraq as trolls? How disgusting . . .
0 Replies
 
Wolf ODonnell
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 08:11 am
cjhsa wrote:
Why ignore the last two? Hmmmmm?


Because the last two aren't derogatory. They may be misappropriations, but they're not racial or derogatory.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 08:59 am
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
Why ignore the last two? Hmmmmm?


Because the last two aren't derogatory. They may be misappropriations, but they're not racial or derogatory.


Aw, nimrod just added the former three to make his disingenuous point. But nothing is disingenuous about our President's plan for victory and freedom in Iraq!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 09:07 am
The only problem with the success in Iraq is the simple fact that he's leaving that for future presidents to reach that elusive goal. Bush is leaving many other things in shambles for the next president too, but who gives a shet? 31 percent still think he's doing a bang-up job.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 09:13 am
Snood referred to Nimrod in his post above.

Nimrod was a Mesapotomian monarch, who purportedly built the Tower of Babel.

Bush is much like Nimrod, the legendary king of the Bible. He too is building a tower in Mesapotomia, which is now known as Iraq. It is a tower of peace, freedom and democracy.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 09:37 am
Speaking of Mesopotamia, Iraq was once known by that name. The same Iraq that is being transformed into a sunny upland of democracy and peace by our stalwart President's bold plan for victory! It's just around the corner!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 03:42 pm
blacksmithn wrote:
Speaking of Mesopotamia, Iraq was once known by that name. The same Iraq that is being transformed into a sunny upland of democracy and peace by our stalwart President's bold plan for victory! It's just around the corner!
And British soldiers who died in their thousands trying to secure iraqi oil wells in WW1 called it Mess-pot.
0 Replies
 
herberts
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 04:37 pm
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e150/ruffdiamond/backdoor1.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 08:50:25