0
   

Countdown to Rove Indictments...

 
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 07:17 am
MM indicted and convicted Cynthia McKinney without "seeing the evidence" but she is black, a woman and a Democrat. Of course, Republican white men are judged by a different standard. If Rove gets indicted and convicted and appeals, he will want to to wait to see if he wins his appeal.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 07:22 am
I am hearing today might be the day.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 04:11 pm
snood wrote:
MM- If he's found out to have done something illegal, would you want Rove indicted and convicted?



Yes,I would.
ANYBODY,including the President,that is found to have broken the law should be indicted and punished if convicted.


Quote:
MM indicted and convicted Cynthia McKinney without "seeing the evidence" but she is black, a woman and a Democrat. Of course, Republican white men are judged by a different standard. If Rove gets indicted and convicted and appeals, he will want to to wait to see if he wins his appeal.


How did I indict and convict Cynthia McKinney?
I posted the news story about her,and said that IF she was convicted,she should get the maximum sentence.
Notice the IF.
You seem to be ignoring that part.

He will have every right to appeal a conviction,if he gets convicted of committing a crime.
Are you saying that he shouldnt have that right.
And if he did win a hypothetical appeal,that erases the conviction.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 05:25 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
Latest I have been hearing is that Rove will likely be indicted within a week to 10 days.


Still waiting
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 07:18 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Latest I have been hearing is that Rove will likely be indicted within a week to 10 days.


Still waiting


Try some valium. It is not a sleep aid as such but my surgeon prescribed it the night before my surgery and I took one and fell right out.


Of course, even the totally clueless would understand that each day that goes by that Rove is not cleared makes it more likely that he will be indicted.

Fitzgerald didn't check with me to make sure his timetable coincides with mine.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 08:21 pm
Quote:
Of course, even the totally clueless would understand that each day that goes by that Rove is not cleared makes it more likely that he will be indicted


OR,Every day that goes by without an indictment makes it more likely that Rove will be cleared.

Both scenarios are equally valid.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 11:04 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
Of course, even the totally clueless would understand that each day that goes by that Rove is not cleared makes it more likely that he will be indicted


OR,Every day that goes by without an indictment makes it more likely that Rove will be cleared.

Both scenarios are equally valid.


No they are not but it is useless explaining that to you.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 09:15 am
Anyway, I decided to do some more research. Many Dem bloggers are questioning Leopold's credibility. I heard him a couple times on Air America and he sounded convincing to me.

If there is no announcement this week, I will start having doubts myself. Knowing Karl Rove's past, I wouldn't put it past him to leak a false story to Leopold in ordeer to destroy his credibilty.

Anyway, the clueless right is welcome to spam the thread with "still waiting" posts but the facts will come out soon enough. And the fact is that Rove made one last ditch effort to clear himself weeks ago. A fair-minded prosecutor like Fitzgerald will notify a possible target that he is cleared as soon as that determination is made. Obvioulsy, Fitzpatrick is leaning toward indictment because he certainly would have cleared Rove by now if that weren't the case.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 10:03 am
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 10:07 am
Leopold has said that he will reveal his sources if it turns out they lied to him; there isn't much more you can ask a reporter to do than that.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 03:18 pm
So either way, this is going to be really interesting.
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 07:43 am
Interesting indeed:
Quote:
In connection with this appearance, the special counsel has advised Mr. Rove that he is not a target of the investigation."


Source
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 07:53 am
I knew there was a thread about this somewhere. Thanks candidone1!
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 08:02 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Leopold has said that he will reveal his sources if it turns out they lied to him; there isn't much more you can ask a reporter to do than that.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 08:17 am
Statement from Christopher Wolf, attorney for outed CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson

RAW STORY
Published: Tuesday June 13, 2006

Statement of Christopher Wolf, Proskauer Rose LLP, Counsel for Ambassador Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame Wilson

"We have become aware of the communication between Mr. Fitzgerald and Mr. Luskin concerning Karl. Rove's status in the criminal investigation. We have no first-hand knowledge of the reason for the communication or what further developments in the criminal investigation it may signal. While it appears that Mr. Rove will not be called to answer in criminal court for his participation in the wrongful disclosure of Valerie Wilson's classified employment status at the CIA in retaliation against Joe Wilson for questioning the rationale for war in Iraq, that obviously does not end the matter. The day still may come when Mr. Rove and others are called to account in a court of law for their attacks on the Wilsons."
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 08:19 am
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 08:47 am
Did Rove rat out Cheney?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 09:00 am
From Fox News story:
"The fact is this, I thought it was wrong when you had people like Howard Dean and (Sen.) Harry Reid presuming that he was guilty," Republican Party Chairman Ken Mehlman told FOX News.

"This is an enormous burden lifted off his shoulders. He always believed that he was totally innocent and that nothing would happen," former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich said of Rove.

Gingrich added that Rove's situation shows that something is wrong with the current legal system.

"There's something wrong when your entire life can be under this kind of threat for two full years, you spend lots and lots of money on lawyers, lots of time going to the grand jury and there's nothing there," Gingrich said."


Amen.


Fitzgerald first needed to determine if the original theorized crime of somebody knowingly leaking the identity of a covert CIA agent actually occurred before carrying on this long drawn out investigation in the first place. As far as I can tell, he has never even accomplished that yet after all this time. Fitzgerald is not making much of a name for himself here. I'm not very impressed.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 09:03 am
Guess we can stop the countdown now, huh?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jun, 2006 09:04 am
Quote:
"There's something wrong when your entire life can be under this kind of threat for two full years, you spend lots and lots of money on lawyers, lots of time going to the grand jury and there's nothing there," Gingrich said."

Amen.


Hallelujah. did you feel the same way after the tens of millions that netted zero on trumped-up counts against the Clintons(travelgate, whitewater, etc., etc., etc.)?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.31 seconds on 01/06/2025 at 04:37:01