Setanta wrote:CoastalRat wrote:And then the poor bleeding hearts here on a2k can only dredge up feelings of sympathy for the poor woman who refused to listen to the instructions from a duly authorized officer. Give me a break.
Somebody should break something of yours. You have quoted exactly one member here who is raging about this. Do you care to name names when you just fling out inflammatory charges about "bleeding hearts," or were you just out for the blanket smear?
[/quote]
Set, been away a while and didn't see your post until this morning. I thought I was being rather specific in calling only those who were defending her actions as being "bleeding hearts". I'm sorry if you have somehow misconstrued that. There have been lots of posts from people here who are not defending her (you, revel, montana, lash, etc). I was not including any of them in category of "bleeding hearts".
I am curious though to know to whom you thought I was referring. While only one member has been raging off the deep end about this, I wrote my comment as I did to cover any others who might jump in the fray with similar thoughts. So why did you seem to take my comment so personally? I did not say "those bleeding heart liberals on a2k", nor did I say "those bleeding heart neo-cons on a2k", nor anything else of like manner. I said simply "bleeding hearts here on a2k can only dredge up feelings of sympathy for the poor woman who refused to listen to the instructions from a duly authorized officer." If the shoe fits, wear it. If not, then I obviously was not talking about you.
But I will try to make my meaning a bit more plain next time in order to not cause any confusion.
