14
   

50,000 Errors in the Bible...Is Bible God's Word??

 
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Mon 27 Jul, 2015 01:43 pm
@neologist,
neologist wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
That doesn't answer the question. Having free will as given by God necessarily precludes obligations, i.e. requirements/ constraints, otherwise it wouldn't be free will.
We have the free will to honor or not honor our obligation. Obligation is not compulsion.

You're right, obligation is not compulsion, and I didn't say it was.

Now that that red herring is out of the way, obligation is requirement/constraint, however. How is it that we're under reqirements and constraints if we have free will?
InfraBlue
 
  0  
Mon 27 Jul, 2015 01:44 pm
@neologist,
So, where do I find this in the Bible, or even JW literature? It seems to be your religion's, or at the very least your, equivalent of trinitarianism.
neologist
 
  1  
Mon 27 Jul, 2015 07:55 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
. . . obligation is requirement/constraint, however. How is it that we're under reqirements and constraints if we have free will?
We may avoid requirements. Constraints seem rather like compulsion
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  0  
Mon 27 Jul, 2015 08:03 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
So, where do I find this in the Bible, or even JW literature? It seems to be your religion's, or at the very least your, equivalent of trinitarianism
The word trinity does not appear in the bible there is a fairly thorough discussion of the topic here
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Tue 28 Jul, 2015 03:31 pm
@neologist,
I'm referring to your theology of God's selective omniscience. It doesn't appear in the Bible either.
neologist
 
  0  
Tue 28 Jul, 2015 06:13 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
I'm referring to your theology of God's selective omniscience. It doesn't appear in the Bible either.
Nor does the word 'omniscient', a troublesome word which, to many, implies necessity. That he is all knowing is not in question.
Quote:
For there is nothing hidden that will not become manifest, nor anything carefully concealed that will never become known and not come out in the open.(Luke 8:17)
But if it were necessary for him to know all things in advance, he could not give us choice.
Quote:
I do take the heavens and the earth as witnesses against YOU today, that I have put life and death before you, the blessing and the malediction; and you must choose life in order that you may keep alive, you and your offspring . . . (Deuteronomy 30:19)


Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Jul, 2015 07:31 pm
@neologist,
neologist wrote:
Nor does the word 'omniscient', a troublesome word which, to many, implies necessity.


You think constantly repeating "omniscient does not imply necessity" answers the question. It doesn't, it only creates a new problem. This new problem is what we have been trying to point out to you but you don't seem to get it or you are willfully ignoring it. Repeating it over and over doesn't address it.

There is a problem with selective omniscience. It is not possible. How can you be selective with knowledge? How can you decide what you want to know and not know if you are suppose to be omniscient from the beginning?

neologist wrote:

That he is all knowing is not in question.


Yes it is in question. Because the theology of christianity does not support the idea that god is omniscient. NONE of the stories portray a god that is omniscient. We have pointed this out many times but you just keep going back to him being able to be selective about what he knows. So which is it? He can't be both omniscient and not omniscient at the same time.
neologist
 
  0  
Tue 28 Jul, 2015 07:44 pm
@Krumple,
I'm comfortable with not using the word omniscient.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Tue 28 Jul, 2015 11:06 pm
@neologist,
Your religion uses it.
neologist
 
  0  
Wed 29 Jul, 2015 12:18 am
@InfraBlue,
True.
And I understand why and how.
Some, however, are far too intelligent to understand.
(Matthew 11:26)
Not much I can do about that.
Smileyrius
 
  2  
Wed 29 Jul, 2015 04:41 am
I think the difference here lies somewhere between God knowing everything, and God having the knowledge of all things at his fingertips. This is assuming he has fingers.

Keep in mind that the bible speaks of angels as reporting to God, You can imagine the scene as another angel returns with some exciting news

Angel - "God, I have spent the last 3 months gathering the information you asked for and have some great and exciting news to sh..."
God interrupts lethargically... "I know"
Angel - *Sadfaces*
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 29 Jul, 2015 04:52 am
@Smileyrius,
Smileyrius wrote:

I think the difference here lies somewhere between God knowing everything, and God having the knowledge of all things at his fingertips. This is assuming he has fingers.


Not salad fingers.

http://orig04.deviantart.net/bf61/f/2012/129/2/8/salad_fingers_whut__by_tuv_the_ca_nip-d4z14d3.jpg
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Wed 29 Jul, 2015 10:37 am
@neologist,
So, your answer is an ad hominem.

Thanks anyway.
neologist
 
  1  
Wed 29 Jul, 2015 04:05 pm
@InfraBlue,
Sorry about that.
But I am at a complete loss for how to further explain how God would be under no compulsion to use his power.
InfraBlue
 
  0  
Thu 30 Jul, 2015 01:29 pm
@neologist,
Yes, you've explained that God is under no compulsion to use his power.

What you haven't explained is the conundrum that your explanation presents.
neologist
 
  0  
Thu 30 Jul, 2015 01:57 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
Yes, you've explained that God is under no compulsion to use his power.

What you haven't explained is the conundrum that your explanation presents.
I do not comprehend why this is a conundrum
InfraBlue
 
  0  
Thu 30 Jul, 2015 04:00 pm
@neologist,
I, in turn, am at a loss to explain it to you.
neologist
 
  0  
Thu 30 Jul, 2015 04:52 pm
@InfraBlue,
It is irrational to conclude that an all powerful God would find anything for which his power would be insufficient. It's his ball. He sets the rules of the game.
vikorr
 
  2  
Fri 31 Jul, 2015 10:59 pm
@neologist,
Not that I particularly care - but for the sake of mental exercise:

- we supposedly remember everything we've ever experienced...but all of our memories are not with us all of the time...we recall our memories as needed:

- recalling our memories as needed is recalling knowledge as needed. Memory is past knowledge

- Omniscience includes past knowledge, present knowledge, and perhaps future knowledge

- we've already established that past knowledge does not need your current awareness for you to actually know that thing.

- I see no reason why omniscience's present & future tenses can't work this way...knowing, but not having that knowledge at your fingertips until you turn your focus to it.

Though why that would actually matter, I don't know.
neologist
 
  0  
Fri 31 Jul, 2015 11:18 pm
@vikorr,
That's a pretty durned good explanation.
Certainly, there is nothing that would be impossible for God.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 07:49:26