anton wrote:I am astonished by your apparent lack of factual information in this argument,
There is no lack of factual information on my part, apparent or otherwise.
anton wrote:how on earth do you see the invasion of Afghanistan as a just war of self defence
Well, they started it by committing a crime against humanity against us, and we finished it in a way that fully complied with the laws of war.
anton wrote:what did the Taliban have to do with 9/11,
The Taliban were supposed to become the government of Osama's empire once he started conquering other countries.
The Taliban were also likely to be the ones who would administer the planned genocide against all non-Muslims in the conquered countries.
anton wrote:As for your thoughts on DU Munitions I'm certain there are many US veterans who would tell you the truth
Maybe so, but I've already gotten the truth from the scientific experts.
anton wrote:the use of such weapons is a crime against humanity.
No it isn't.
You should learn what words mean before you make accusations based on them.
The article is quite dishonest. Agent Orange is a defoliant, not a chemical weapon. And the only nuclear war fought by the US was in 1945.
It is likely that the people mentioned in the article never said what was claimed, and it is even possible that the people themselves were merely made up by the author.
Making up fictitious "experts" is a convenient tactic of the extremists on the fringe of the anti-war movement, because actual people may complain if they are misquoted, leading to bad press, but a fictitious expert will never complain.