0
   

Soldiers are saying - "Get us Outta Here!"

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 01:12 pm
SAS soldier quits Army in disgust at 'illegal' American tactics in Iraq

Quote:
An SAS soldier has refused to fight in Iraq and has left the Army over the "illegal" tactics of United States troops and the policies of coalition forces.

After three months in Baghdad, Ben Griffin told his commander that he was no longer prepared to fight alongside American forces.

He said he had witnessed "dozens of illegal acts" by US troops, claiming they viewed all Iraqis as "untermenschen" - the Nazi term for races regarded as sub-human.

The decision marks the first time an SAS soldier has refused to go into combat and quit the Army on moral grounds.

It immediately brought to an end Mr Griffin's exemplary, eight-year career in which he also served with the Parachute Regiment, taking part in operations in Northern Ireland, Macedonia and Afghanistan.


The fatal divide at the heart of the Coalition

Quote:
This is another quote from a British security contractor: "The American way is not my way. I don't mind a scrap but I draw the line at mooning the enemy and inviting him to shoot at my backside, and that's virtually what the Yanks are doing. I'm also convinced that many Americans hate the Iraqis, not just the insurgents but all IraqisÂ… What a mess."

Those last lines are taken from a rather good new book about the experience of Iraq today, Highway To Hell, written by an ex-SAS man who signs himself John Geddes. My point in all the above, is to show that Ben Griffin, the former SAS soldier who vents his dismay about what is happening to Iraq in today's Sunday Telegraph, is not a lone voice.

There is a widespread belief in both British special forces and line regiments that American tactics are heavy-handed and counter-productive; that firepower continues to be used as a substitute for a "hearts and minds" policy; that local people will never be persuaded to support Coalition forces unless Americans, in uniform and out, treat ordinary Iraqis vastly better than they do today.



this can't be good
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 01:15 pm
ehBeth, It was never "good." All this administration knows is to "stay the coarse" to put more people in harms way. They are all idiots without a clue.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 01:17 pm
Concur, folks.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 07:09 pm
Should make us all proud of our military.

http://www.willthomas.net/Video-Store/index.htm
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 08:46 pm
kickycan wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
dlowan wrote:
Actually, Fedral, I think you will find that soldiers ALWAYS want to come home, but do NOT always think they should "get out of there".


I think of my uncle's letters from England during WW II, where he flew bombers over germany...especially the letter sent on D Day, as he waited to take off on what he obviously knew, as always, might be his last mission.


Sure, he wanted to come home, but he also clearly felt that what he was doing was worth the horror, and was deeply frustrated that others were flying while ha was still on the ground.

Maybe its because the people and press at home weren't tearing the war effort down continuously, or finding allied conspiracies under every tree.


Do you actually believe that the news and information they get is the same as what you see? I wish there were someone here who was actually in Iraq, so that they could tell us what news they get. I would be willing to bet it's filtered through the government lens.

In other words, your contention is nothing more than a pile of horseshit you've come up with to convince yourself that you're right.


Then you can talk to me,if you really want to know what news we get over there.
I served with the marines (2 batt,25th marines) in Iraq,plus I served in Afghanistan,Somalia,Desert Storm, and Grenada.

I DO have combat experience,so if that is required to have an opinion,then I guess I qualify.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 09:08 pm
If what we have observed in the past of what we can expect in the future, we have read both sides of this issue from soldiers that have served or are serving in Iraq. Some say they are proud to be serving, and they are making a difference, while others say they have seen more chaos, mistreatment of civilians, and unrest.

The truth is probably both; but we must always remember that those that serve on the front lines of battle always connect with their fellow soldiers more than they do about the realities of any conflict which is "political."

We don't see many soldiers talking against their commanders or the president during peace time or during times of war. That's always been part and parcel of being a soldier.
0 Replies
 
mele42846
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 09:40 pm
I see you were very frightened and could not respond to Mysteryman's post, Cicerone. It is typical for people like you who know nothing about what is really going on in the Middle East to go right past Mysteryman's post but then it is understandable because if you listened to a veteran who was really there, you might learn something.

But you really don't want to have your left wing biases disturbed, do you?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 09:59 pm
Me frightened of mm? You're ofcoarse talking about yourself. I do straight talk with mm or anybody else on a2k. I do not back down from challenge. Your inability to understand the English language is your problem. Go back to school. The articles posted by other members criticizing this war is probably more American than the likes of you. I served our country in the military as did my two brothers. Our son served in the first Gulf War in Saudi Arabia. You know nothing about me.
0 Replies
 
mele42846
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:06 pm
I showed that the writer of the letter did not even have any effect in the counties where he worked. This is shown by the fact that the Representatives in the House of Representatives are both solidly conservative Republicans.

If the senile writer had any influence, it would have surely showed up in the area where he served. He is probably a kook.

Do you want to learn about Iraq and what is really happening there? You can learn from Mysteryman who served in Iraq.

The writer of the letter is a kook!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:14 pm
What does it matter that the letter written by that soldier was ignored by people in his county?

That you would conclude he is a kook speaks more about you than it does about the writer of that letter to Bush.

We learn what is happening in Iraq almost daily; more of our soldiers and innocent Iraqis getting killed with no end in sight.

This is the president you support, but if you bother to read any of the respectable media all over the world, you'll find that Bush's performance rating is now below 40 percent. He's no longer popular or respected by most Americans or people around the world. You may continue to praise this messiah, because you are blind to the realities of the destruction metted out by Bushco.

I'll stand shoulder to shoulder with the writer of that letter to Bush any day of the week - 24/7. I'd spit on Bush for having gone AWOL; he deserves no respect.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:18 pm
mele, If you can read, try the following article on for size.

Field seeks distance from Bush
GOP hopefuls stake out 2008 strategies.



Knight Ridder Newspapers
Published Wednesday, October 12, 2005
PHILADELPHIA - Back when President George W. Bush was riding high - before the public turned sour on Iraq, before conservatives got mad about his lavish federal spending and his Harriet Miers nomination - it was widely assumed that the 2008 Republican presidential candidates would vie among themselves for the right to proudly carry their leader's torch.

But that's not happening.

The Republican hopefuls - as many as a dozen men who already are jockeying for advantage - don't want to be perceived as insiders and heirs to the Bush political establishment. On the contrary, most of them are trying to advertise their independence, to distance themselves from Bush on key issues, to appear as rebels fed up with the wicked ways of Washington.
0 Replies
 
mele42846
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:20 pm
President Bush's Approval Rating is below 40%?

I have news for you. He won't win when he runs again.

What import does the President's Approval Rating have?

Does the government run according to Approval Ratings?

You had best pay attention to the Senate and House Races in November 2006, instead of looking at the Approval Rating of a President who will not run for office again because he is constitutionally barred from running.

When the Republicans hold on to their majorities in the House and Senate in November 2006,I will remind you.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:21 pm
mele, What have you done for this country?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:21 pm
Besides supporting a loser, that is.
0 Replies
 
mele42846
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:52 pm
What have I ever done for this country? I fought against the fanatical Japanese in World War II.

That's what I did!!!!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:55 pm
Good for you. Now, go back to your retirement home and talk to your other war vets about "the good war."
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 10:58 pm
mele42846 wrote:
What have I ever done for this country? I fought against the fanatical Japanese in World War II.

That's what I did!!!!



Oh, you're an old offensive pain-in-the-butt....

Senility might mitigate some of your foolishness, but that isn't nearly enough...
Hey, maybe you can claim dementia?
0 Replies
 
mele42846
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 11:05 pm
At least I am not foolish enough to put up a poor picture of Spike Lee as my avatar. If you are suffering under the delusion that he is a good director or even a good man, you obviously don't know enough about him.

The coeds at Harvard complained incessantly about the "dirty old man">
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 11:12 pm
mele,

Snood is not a dirty old man. And, what does his avatar have to do with who he is? I use an angel as my avatar. Do you think that makes me an angel? You think I think it makes me an angel? It doesn't.

I don't understand you, mele. You seem to have a chip on your shoulder a mile wide. You have been offered friendship here on A2K and yet you seem to reject it.

I don't understand that. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Mar, 2006 11:29 pm
Mele, I gotta say that personally I find your style and manner of interaction here somewhere between tiresome and offensive. It does appear you're trying hard to pick fights with just about anyone who doesn't toe your ideologic line. With all respect, partner, I think it only fair you be advised such practice is not thought of highly hereabouts, and generally structures a short career track for those so engaged.


Oh ... and, as an addendum ...

To whom it may concern:


PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 04:48:04