3
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 09:48 am
A hallmark of your ilk.





(Hadn't said ilk in weeks.)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:04 am
Upton Sinclair used the tern "ilk" when referring to Hinky Dink Kenna, an Alderman in Chicago at the turn of the 20th century. Although he left his heirs an estate worth over one million dollars, and left $33,000 for a mausoleum for his remains to repose in, his heirs took the all of the money and bought him an eighty-five dollar tombstone instead.
Men of my ilk will be buried in a sleeping bag under a saguaro in the Sonoran Desert, on a rock nearby will be the epitaph "Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo"
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:09 am
Brother Pooky Inspired Switchblade of Patience,

I must recall to your attention that I am not down on the ilksters. I have my own.

Please don't abuse the garden because of me and my quippiness.

Your Favorite Heretic,

Lashella
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:10 am
Dys
dyslexia wrote:
Upton Sinclair used the tern "ilk" when referring to Hinky Dink Kenna, an Alderman in Chicago at the turn of the 20th century. Although he left his heirs an estate worth over one million dollars, and left $33,000 for a mausoleum for his remains to repose in, his heirs took the all of the money and bought him an eighty-five dollar tombstone instead.
Men of my ilk will be buried in a sleeping bag under a saguaro in the Sonoran Desert, on a rock nearby will be the epitaph "Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo"


I was not. I was. I am not. I do not care [Other].
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:17 am
Will she be translating all the posts now?
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:28 am
I certianly hope so!

Since Mass went English, i'm lost...

Very Happy
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:29 am
The people on the left posting here are in full agreement with the relevant rules governing the conduct of members. I don't know how many times I have had to remind you all that we have not, do not, and will not act in violation of these rules.

However, it is patently obvious that the rule quoted above is ambiguous and no one knows precisely what it means. We are not, I repeat, not, trying to redefine this rule. Rather we just want it clarified so that posters can get on with their important work of posting.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 10:37 am
This is fine, blatham. Every full moon, we get pissed and strafe the Whiny Democrat thread. It keeps us up on our slurs and put-downs.

(Look, peeps. They can't understand the rule.) <sly smile>
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 11:40 am
<sigh>

Bernie, posters at the forum are well aware of the rules.

The republicans need dry their eyes for at least four pages, gain their composure, call rove, and find a favorable george poll is all.

Other than that 'peeps' - have a good day.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 01:17 pm
blatham wrote:
The people on the left posting here are in full agreement with the relevant rules governing the conduct of members. I don't know how many times I have had to remind you all that we have not, do not, and will not act in violation of these rules.

Laughing

This debate is occurring because of the Supreme Moderators' ruling that said that we must conduct ourselves under the Common Article 3 of the Terms of Service.

And that Common Article 3 says, you know, be courteous. You agree that you will not threaten or verbally abuse other members, use defamatory language, or deliberately disrupt topics with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or "spam." It's like - it's very vague. What does that mean, meaningless messages? That's a statement that is wide open to interpretation. And what I'm proposing is that there be clarity in the law so that our professional posters will have no doubt that that which they're posting is legal.

(hint, hint)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 01:35 pm
Wet birds never fly at night.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 01:48 pm
ANNAPOLIS, Md. - A national black Republican group is running a radio advertisement accusing Democrats of starting the Ku Klux Klan and saying the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, a claim challenged by civil-rights researchers.

Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the black Republican nominee for Maryland's open Senate seat, disavowed the ad Thursday as "insulting to Marylanders". He said his campaign asked the Washington-based National Black Republican Association to stop running it.

At an event in Baltimore, Steele said, "I don't know exactly what the intent of the ad was" but that "it's not helpful to the public discourse."
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 03:24 pm
Okay, those of you who support the President's view on how terrorist prisoners should be interrogated/treated/accommodated and also appreciate the relevent satire of Ann Coulter will enjoy the following:

(I especially liked the closing line. ) Smile

ARE VIDEOTAPED BEHEADINGS COVERED BY GENEVA?SOURCE
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 03:40 pm
Quote:
the four pathetic Republicans


That's Ann, bearing all the grace, goodness of heart and national value of a syphilitic penis.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 03:42 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Okay, those of you who support the President's view on how terrorist prisoners should be interrogated/treated/accommodated and also appreciate the relevent satire of Ann Coulter will enjoy the following:

(I especially liked the closing line. ) Smile

ARE VIDEOTAPED BEHEADINGS COVERED BY GENEVA?SOURCE


Good grief Foxy, if your going to present an argument put someone with some credibility up there. Ann Colter is one of the biggest liars in the conservative camp. You can't trust anything she says.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 04:22 pm
This is the Bush supporters thread, Xingu, and Ann Coulter, a critic of the President when warranted and a supporter of the President when warranted, is welcomed here by several posting on this thread.

In my opinion, those who have nothing good at all to say about the President--in other words those who refuse to support him in anything--are far more liar and have far less credibility by posting on this thread than anything Ann Coulter has ever exaggerated or misrepresented via satire.

There are dozens of Bush bashing threads out there. This one is for those who can now and then find something good to say about the current Administration/Congress etc.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 04:48 pm
dyslexia wrote:
ANNAPOLIS, Md. - A national black Republican group is running a radio advertisement accusing Democrats of starting the Ku Klux Klan and saying the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, a claim challenged by civil-rights researchers.

Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the black Republican nominee for Maryland's open Senate seat, disavowed the ad Thursday as "insulting to Marylanders". He said his campaign asked the Washington-based National Black Republican Association to stop running it.

At an event in Baltimore, Steele said, "I don't know exactly what the intent of the ad was" but that "it's not helpful to the public discourse."


If you want to see viscousness, witness liberal blacks attack conservative blacks, so turnabout may be part of the equation here, but I think it is undeniable that some of the biggest segregationists were southern Democrats, and I would not be surprised if many of them were important movers and shakers of the KKK in its heyday. Hey, even Senator Byrd has a history of some involvement in the KKK in his past, and he is still a vaunted spokesman and powerbroker of the Democratic Party.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 05:33 pm
okie wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
ANNAPOLIS, Md. - A national black Republican group is running a radio advertisement accusing Democrats of starting the Ku Klux Klan and saying the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, a claim challenged by civil-rights researchers.

Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the black Republican nominee for Maryland's open Senate seat, disavowed the ad Thursday as "insulting to Marylanders". He said his campaign asked the Washington-based National Black Republican Association to stop running it.

At an event in Baltimore, Steele said, "I don't know exactly what the intent of the ad was" but that "it's not helpful to the public discourse."


If you want to see viscousness, witness liberal blacks attack conservative blacks, so turnabout may be part of the equation here, but I think it is undeniable that some of the biggest segregationists were southern Democrats, and I would not be surprised if many of them were important movers and shakers of the KKK in its heyday. Hey, even Senator Byrd has a history of some involvement in the KKK in his past, and he is still a vaunted spokesman and powerbroker of the Democratic Party.

You are obviously ignorant of reality and history, the dixiecrats left the democrat party with the nomination of H S Truman (who supported integration) and became true to themselves Republicans and or American Independent Party) and yes, of course, they were often members of the KKK just as their republican brethren. If you really want to see viscousness visit your county or state Republican party strategy meetings.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 05:34 pm
You guys want to see viscousness? Pour a jar of molasses on the table.

Now, viciousness, you'll have to watch some of the ads put on by the Republicans this cycle for that.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Sep, 2006 05:53 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You guys want to see viscousness? Pour a jar of molasses on the table.

Now, viciousness, you'll have to watch some of the ads put on by the Republicans this cycle for that.

Cycloptichorn

Truer words were never spoken. I like my wafflews heavy on the 30 weight.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.41 seconds on 05/25/2025 at 03:59:11