Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

Could you guys go find another thread to post your garbage?

In my opinion, those who have nothing good at all to say about the President--in other words those who refuse to support him in anything--are far more liar and have far less credibility by posting on this thread than anything Ann Coulter has ever exaggerated or misrepresented via satire.

I'm certain that there are many good things that can be said about Bush, although none come immediately to mind, but the plain truth is that he has so badly screwed up everything and these are the things that get discussed.

You've just missed those times when Dys, Walter, Blatham and others have posted 'good' things about George, 'cause the bad things so heavily outweigh the good.

There are dozens of Bush bashing threads out there. This one is for those who can now and then find something good to say about the current Administration/Congress etc.

"now and then", what hilarity! You're a bunch of non-thinking sycophants, sheeple, unable to critically assess just how badly this government has messed up.

Rep. Tim Ryan Blasts the Administration's Iraq Record

[rough transcript]

Let's be honest here, Mr. Speaker, this is a joke, OK?

Because this is about 84% of Americans saying that we're losing the war in Iraq. This is about all of these generals that we've been showing night in and night out saying there's no plan to get out of here; there was a bad plan to get in; there was a bad plan to start with; and there was no plan; bad information; bad intelligence; nothing was right. Look back at everything they said about using the oil for reconstruction money; about being greeted as liberators; about all of this nonsense that we heard before.

This is an opportunity for this administration, Mr. Meek, to try to change the subject. And all of a sudden, we're talking about a few political prisoners-and it has enormous ramifications-but the bottom line is this: this administration wants to talk about anything but the war or the economy.

They want to change the subject when they get a chance to and now we've got this debate about military prisoners and I'm not saying that it's not important, but my God, you got millions of people living in poverty. You got seniors and you threaten them with their Medicare. And you have 40 million people without health insurance. You have stagnant wages. You have gas prices going up, you have health care going up, you have tuition going up, you have poverty rates going up and you have veterans' benefits going down. And you want to talk about this little sliver to change the subject?

And you're coming up with new phrases again, fascism and all of this stuff. $8.4 billion per month; $1.9 billion per week in Iraq; $275 million per day in Iraq; $11.5 million per hour in Iraq. If this is the legacy of the Bush administration, you know what? If I was in the White House, I wouldn't want that talk about this either.

And what I'm proposing is that there be clarity in the law so that our professional posters will have no doubt

jpinMilwaukee wrote:

Why didn't you post the whole rule, Walter?

Quote:

...or deliberately disrupt topics with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or "spam."

This is the Bush Supporters thread. Posters here have repeatedly "spammed" the thread with the purpose of "deliberately disrupt(ing)" the topic. McG kindly asked that they desist and they refuse. Next time, why don't you get your rule book out for them as well.

I suppose this applies to posters such as SierraSong or Ticomaya as well as others from the "far side" on such topics supporting left or democrats? or not?

okie wrote:

dyslexia wrote:

ANNAPOLIS, Md. - A national black Republican group is running a radio advertisement accusing Democrats of starting the Ku Klux Klan and saying the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican, a claim challenged by civil-rights researchers.

Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, the black Republican nominee for Maryland's open Senate seat, disavowed the ad Thursday as "insulting to Marylanders". He said his campaign asked the Washington-based National Black Republican Association to stop running it.

At an event in Baltimore, Steele said, "I don't know exactly what the intent of the ad was" but that "it's not helpful to the public discourse."

If you want to see viscousness, witness liberal blacks attack conservative blacks, so turnabout may be part of the equation here, but I think it is undeniable that some of the biggest segregationists were southern Democrats, and I would not be surprised if many of them were important movers and shakers of the KKK in its heyday. Hey, even Senator Byrd has a history of some involvement in the KKK in his past, and he is still a vaunted spokesman and powerbroker of the Democratic Party.

You are obviously ignorant of reality and history, the dixiecrats left the democrat party with the nomination of H S Truman (who supported integration) and became true to themselves Republicans and or American Independent Party) and yes, of course, they were often members of the KKK just as their republican brethren. If you really want to see viscousness visit your county or state Republican party strategy meetings.

Stradee told us how McCain, Graham and Warner have betrayed the people of the USA and worse of all, future US troops that may be captured by an enemy in subsequent wars, by capitulating to the demands of the neanderthals. It appears that not only has torture been redefined, but that the prisoners will not have the right to see the evidence gathered against them since it is classified. This is a real assault against the Geneva Convention and another stain on the rule of George W, Bush!

MarionT wrote:

Stradee told us how McCain, Graham and Warner have betrayed the people of the USA and worse of all, future US troops that may be captured by an enemy in subsequent wars, by capitulating to the demands of the neanderthals. It appears that not only has torture been redefined, but that the prisoners will not have the right to see the evidence gathered against them since it is classified. This is a real assault against the Geneva Convention and another stain on the rule of George W, Bush!

What Bush wants is not torture. It would be like calling a cold lung cancer.

mrcool011 wrote:

MarionT wrote:

Stradee told us how McCain, Graham and Warner have betrayed the people of the USA and worse of all, future US troops that may be captured by an enemy in subsequent wars, by capitulating to the demands of the neanderthals. It appears that not only has torture been redefined, but that the prisoners will not have the right to see the evidence gathered against them since it is classified. This is a real assault against the Geneva Convention and another stain on the rule of George W, Bush!

What Bush wants is not torture. It would be like calling a cold lung cancer.

Oh boy. Like Bushie says, we needs to join the solar system!!
mruncool, you are a bona fide sheeple. Congrats.

I did not vote for bush nor would i ever. But i do know one thing, that is not torture.

And a helpful tip to all...

Marion appears to be a five-eyed slutosaur from the Alpha Centauri system, specifically, the reeking fourth planet Bernardagattos.

Yeah, I picked up on that. Unbelievable, huh?