0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, TENTH THREAD.

 
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 03:44 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
The governent of Iraq did not reply to our demand. The USA subsequently invaded Iraq.


Hmm, you don't think the fact that we had been bombing Iraq for the last ten years had anything to do with them not aceding to our demands?

Cycloptichorn

Let's assume that was his excuse: Saddam was terribly offended because we "bombed" (e.g., in December 1998, shot missles at) his radar and anti-aircraft rocket installations, and therefore he ignored our demand they remove al-Qaeda from their country.

That doesn't change the fact that al-Qaeda found sanctuary in Iraq in December 2001 and grew substantially by the time we invaded Iraq in March 2003.

Let's assume the Taliban had the same excuse: They were terribly offended because we "bombed" (e.g., in August 1998, shot missles at) al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, and therefore they ignored our demand they remove al-Qaeda from their country.

That doesn't change the fact that al-Qaeda found sanctuary in Afghanistan in May 1996 and grew substantially by the time we invaded Afghanistan in October 2001.

Of course neither of these terrible offenses by us changes the fact that al-Qaeda declared war on Americans and their allies in 1992, 1996, and 1998, and murdered 3,000 USA citizens September 11, 2001 (because of which we were terribly offended).

But yes, the poor fellers were nonetheless so terribly offended by our actions that they ignored our demands to remove al-Qaeda from their countries. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 03:54 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
Joe Nation, that is quite a statement about Feith from Haydon and substantiated by a lot of documentaion. Yet Haydon has been misleading himself in other areas. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/190506tapphones.htm


I am more than familiar with Echelon, reading about intelligence gathering has been an interest of mine for thirty years. I just finishedChatter It's is a wonderful book that isn't quite as hysterical as some sites.


Full disclosure: In my long ago Air Force days, part of my duties involved tapping AF base phones whenever a particular sensitive mission was about to launch. We would fly in and overnight tap and tape everything from the pay phone in front of the NCO club to the top officer's home line. Our mission was to see if everyone was keeping their mouths shut. They seldom were.

One thing you have to remember about the present bunch in Washington is that they don't think the Constitution contains a right to privacy. They vehemently object to it's use in supporting a woman's right to choose and they sure don't want anybody using it for any other purposes, like living your life in freedom.

Joe(Strange how the wheel goes round.)Nation
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 03:54 pm
Amigo wrote:

...
A March 27 Time magazine report published claims by an Iraqi civil rights group that the Marines barged into houses near the bomb strike, throwing grenades and shooting civilians as they cowered in fear.

The report prompted calls for a Pentagon probe.
...

Thes marines should be tried, and if guilty, executed ... uh ... unless they were simply suffering from a mental disorder brought on by the death of their buddy. In that case, they merely need counseling, and discharge from the marines, right? Confused
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 04:02 pm
Quote:
That doesn't change the fact that al-Qaeda found sanctuary in Iraq in December 2001 and grew substantially by the time we invaded Iraq in March 2003.


This fact is in fact nonsense. Part of the hyped-up Feith produced cherry-picked blather that we went to war on. You can repeat it all you want, but the fact of the matter is, as President Bush himself has said, there was no connection between Iraq and the Al Queda's attack of 9-11. Just because some Kurds with a grudge and a hand-out for GI cash said someone was Al Queda doesn't make it so. It just gets Douglas Feith and the boys excited.

Joe(there are more Al Queda members in Pakistan right now then there ever were in Iraq. There are more in Saudia Arabia and Yemen. Give up the fantasy that that was why we invaded.)Nation
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 04:14 pm
BBC NEWS
Iraq 'finalises unity government'
Iraq's PM-designate Nouri Maliki says the make-up of the cabinet has been finalised but the posts of interior and defence minister will be filled later.

Mr Maliki will present the cabinet for approval by parliament on Saturday.

Shias, Sunni Arabs and Kurds have been in dispute over the make-up of the unity government since elections in December, causing a power vacuum.

US and Iraqi officials have said the unity government is the country's best chance avoiding a full sectarian war.

'Independents'

The Associated Press news agency quoted Mr Maliki as saying: "We decided on the names of the ministers and we will announce them... except for interior and defence ministries.

"Both will be acting ministers until we will choose the best ministers for those posts."

The defence ministry runs the army while the interior ministry controls the police.

Officials said Mr Maliki, a Shia, would himself take the interior ministry temporarily while a Sunni politician would cover the defence ministry post.

Sources said the parties had given themselves a week to find compromise on the permanent posts.

Mr Maliki said the choices would be "well known as independents, honest, not loyal to any militia or the equivalent".

Interim Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, a Kurd, is reported to be staying on. Bayan Jabor, the current Shia interior minister, is said to have been given the finance portfolio.

Sources say nuclear scientist Hussain al-Shahristani, a Shia, is to become oil minister. None of these appointments have been confirmed.

The government is the first to include the main Sunni Muslim factions, which had boycotted the interim elections and cabinet.

The BBC's Jim Muir in Baghdad says the hope is that by including them now, other Sunni factions which have taken up arms can be persuaded to join the political process.

A senior Sunni politician, Adnan al-Dulaimi, told AP his coalition would support Mr Maliki's cabinet choices.

The 275-member parliament - the Council of Representatives - will meet on Saturday to consider approving the cabinet.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/4999502.stm


While the killings continue...
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 04:31 pm
Joe Nation wrote:

...
One thing you have to remember about the present bunch in Washington is that they don't think the Constitution contains a right to privacy. They vehemently object to it's use in supporting a woman's right to choose and they sure don't want anybody using it for any other purposes, like living your life in freedom.

Joe(Strange how the wheel goes round.)Nation


One cannot live one's life in freedom if one is dead.

emphasis added by ican
Quote:
The Constitution of the United States of America
...
Article II.
Section 2.
...
The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States;
...
Amendment IV.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
...


Are phone taps of suspected, but not proven, terrorists a threat to American civilians living a life of freedom, or are they a way to secure American civilians living a life of freedom?

emphasis added by ican
Quote:
The Declaration of Independence
(Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776)

...
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Clearly, phone taps of suspected, but not proven, terrorists are not a threat to American civilians living a life of freedom, but they are a way to secure American civilians living a life of freedom
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 04:49 pm
War Is Peace

Freedom Is Slavery


(Meet John Negroponte and the South America Iraq conection -Amigo)

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=5457

The bearable lightness of being John Negroponte's conscience

"It may have been a long trek politically for John Negroponte from proconsul in Honduras to proconsul in Baghdad. But for a man with no noticeable moral conscience the distance is a very short step. Along with his colleague John Maisto, now US Representative to the Organization of American States, Negroponte worked efficiently to cover-up and explain away atrocities and human rights abuses so as to expedite Ronald Reagan's terrorist war in Central America."

"With his well-documented record in Central America, Negroponte is certainly the right man to represent the Bush regime in Iraq. He is the very model of a totally Teflon torture manager. The fact that neither Congress nor mainstream media ever grill Negroponte seriously on his record in Honduras does much to explain the catastrophe in Iraq. We can try and hide the truth about ourselves in the attic like the portrait of Dorian Gray. But the ugliness and the horror remain there all the same."

-------------------------------

(The "El Salador option" -amigo)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/03/AR2005120300881.html

Iraq's Death Squads

Sunday, December 4, 2005; Page B06

OF ALL THE bloodshed in Iraq, none may be more disturbing than the campaign of torture and murder being conducted by U.S.-trained government police forces. Reports last week in the Los Angeles Times and New York Times chronicled how Iraqi Interior Ministry commando and police units have been infiltrated by two Shiite militias, which have been conducting ethnic cleansing and rounding up Sunnis suspected of supporting the insurgency. Hundreds of bodies have been appearing along roadsides and in garbage dumps, some with acid burns or with holes drilled in them. According to the searing account by Solomon Moore of the Los Angeles Times, "the Baghdad morgue reports that dozens of bodies arrive at the same time on a weekly basis, including scores of corpses with wrists bound by police handcuffs." The reports followed a raid two weeks ago by U.S. troops on a clandestine Baghdad prison run by the Interior Ministry, where some 170 men, most of them Sunni and most of them starved or tortured, were found.

The danger this development poses to Iraq, and to the prospects of a successful end to the U.S. mission there, ought to be obvious. A dirty war conducted by the Iraqi government against one ethnic group will make civil war inevitable. It will render impossible a political accord among Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds, while increasing the likelihood that Iraq will splinter. U.S. commanders will be unable to hand responsibility off to Iraqi forces without inviting a bloodbath, and the training mission that President Bush described at length in his speech on Wednesday will be utterly discredited. If there is to be any chance of achieving Mr. Bush's goals of a united and democratic Iraq that protects the rights of its minorities, the state-sponsored death squads and torture chambers must be dismantled.

------------------------

(War is peace American Democracy -Amigo)

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=4300

John Negroponte, the US National Intelligence Director, provided testimony on Tuesday at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on "global threats." Negroponte, who was the US ambassador to Iraq from June 2004 to April 2005, was immediately promoted to his current position after his presence in Iraq. Ironically, he warned the committee on Tuesday, "If chaos were to descend upon Iraq or the forces of democracy were to be defeated in that country ... this would have implications for the rest of the Middle East region and, indeed, the world."

Warning of the outcome of a possible civil war in Iraq, Negroponte said sectarian civil war in Iraq would be a "serious setback" to the global war on terror. Note - he did not say it would be a "serious setback" to the Iraqi people, over 1,400 of whom have been slaughtered in sectarian violence touched off by the bombing of the Golden Mosque last week in
Samarra.

No, the violence and instability in Iraq would be a "serious setback" to the global "war on terror."

But it's interesting for him to continue, "The consequences for the people of Iraq would be catastrophic," whilst feigning his concern. Because generating catastrophic consequences for civilian populations just happens to be his specialty.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 04:52 pm
Joe Nation wrote:

...
the fact of the matter is, as President Bush himself has said, there was no connection between Iraq and the Al Queda's attack of 9-11.
...

Well at least you got this right, Joe.

Joe ... December 2001 came after September 2001.

Joe ... What was true September 2001, was no longer true December 2001.

Yes indeedee, Joe there was "no operational relationship" between al-Qaeda and Saddam upto and including September 11, 2001. But there was an "operational relationship" between al-Qaeda and Saddam by December 2001.

How do we know that?

Joe, our military found 'em, killed some of 'em, and captured some of 'em in the first weeks of the war.

Zarqawi and Zawahiri, two current leaders of al-Qaeda, have both repeatedly informed us that there are now a large number of al-Qaeda in Iraq who are doing their damnedness to drive the US out of Iraq by sparking a civil war between the Sunni and Shia in Iraq. In captured letters, they have stated their objective is to convince the USA to leave Iraq, so as to permit Iraq to become a permanent sanctuary for al-Qaeda.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 04:59 pm
Amigo wrote:
War Is Peace

Freedom Is Slavery

...

War is a means to win back peace from those who have declared war on you, have made war on you, and have been killing you.

Freedom is a means to combat slavery of you by those who have declared war on you, have made war on you, and have been killing you.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 05:17 pm
Quote:
Zarqawi and Zawahiri, two current leaders of al-Qaeda, have both repeatedly informed us that there are now a large number of al-Qaeda in Iraq who are doing their damnedness to drive the US out of Iraq by sparking a civil war between the Sunni and Shia in Iraq. In captured letters, they have stated their objective is to convince the USA to leave Iraq, so as to permit Iraq to become a permanent sanctuary for al-Qaeda.

And why are they there? Because of George Bush. Bush has made Iraq into what Afghanistan was during the Russian invasion, a training ground for terrorist. We can all thank Bush for helping the terrorist recruit and train new terrorist to kill Americans. As long as Americans are in Iraq we will help create new terrorist.

By the way, most of the insurgency today in Iraq are Sunni Iraqi Muslims. Al Qaeda is a minority.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 05:20 pm
Funny how the 29%ers still defend the lies America saw through and led to Bushie's 29% approval.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 May, 2006 05:47 pm
I heard that report too. I'm sure that was not an isolated incident either. They went in a rage, hell bent on taking revenge on somebody - anybody.

Our country has sure gone down the toilet since the Republicans took office. Damn them to hell. I am so ashamed.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 05:40 am
xingu wrote:
Quote:
Zarqawi and Zawahiri, two current leaders of al-Qaeda, have both repeatedly informed us that there are now a large number of al-Qaeda in Iraq who are doing their damnedness to drive the US out of Iraq by sparking a civil war between the Sunni and Shia in Iraq. In captured letters, they have stated their objective is to convince the USA to leave Iraq, so as to permit Iraq to become a permanent sanctuary for al-Qaeda.

And why are they there? Because of George Bush. Bush has made Iraq into what Afghanistan was during the Russian invasion, a training ground for terrorist. We can all thank Bush for helping the terrorist recruit and train new terrorist to kill Americans. As long as Americans are in Iraq we will help create new terrorist.

By the way, most of the insurgency today in Iraq are Sunni Iraqi Muslims. Al Qaeda is a minority.



Exactly right.
Had we stayed on the hunt full time for Osama in Afghanistan/Pakistan we might have managed to stop them cold, but obsessive/compulsives in high office have led us to where we are today. Deep trouble in Iraq and Osama still somewhere hooked up to his dyalisys machine.

Joe(sigh)Nation
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 06:40 am
Iraqi Parliament Approves New Cabinet

Quote:
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq's parliament approved a national unity government on Saturday, achieving a goal the U.S. hopes will reduce widespread violence so that U.S. forces can eventually go home. But as the legislators met, at least 27 people were killed and dozens wounded in a series of attacks.

Police also found the bodies of 21 Iraqis who apparently had been kidnapped and tortured by death squads that plague the capital and another area. The wounded included two British soldiers whose convoy was hit by a roadside bomb in the southern city of Basra, police said.

In a show of hands, the 275-member parliament approved each Cabinet minister proposed by incoming Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The new ministers then took their oaths of office in the nationally televised session in Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone.

That completed a democratic process that began following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

In his first address, al-Maliki told parliament that he would make restoring stability and security the top priority of his new administration. He said he would "work fast" to improve and coordinate Iraqi forces so they can reduce attacks by insurgent groups and militias.

Al-Maliki said he would set "an objective timetable to transfer the full security mission to Iraqi forces, ending the mission of the multinational forces."

But his failure to fill the top two security porfolios illustrated the challenges ahead. Al-Maliki, a Shiite, said he would be acting interior minister for now, and he made Salam Zikam al-Zubaie, a Sunni Arab, the temporary defense minister.

That angered some legislators, and before the Cabinet was approved by a show of hands, parliament turned down a motion by Sunni Arab leader Saleh al-Mutlaq to postpone the session.

Al-Mutlaq then walked out with about 10 other Sunni deputies.


[The rest of the article found at link]

I am sure that those who claim that the media distorts the news of Iraq would omit the bad news in the following article and just say "Iraq's parliament approved a national unity government on Saturday." These reports of violence and chaos in Iraq get in the way of their "happy talk" strategy.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 07:58 am
Quote:
Why Sunni are key in sectarian warfare
5/20/2006 The Independent - By Patrick Cockburn
The Sunni Arabs of Iraq feel they are fighting for their very existence. Some 5 million strong, they see themselves as fighting against a foreign occupation and impending Shia and Kurdish domination.

The past three years have brought nothing but disasters. When Saddam Hussein was overthrown many Sunni reviled him as a disastrous ruler. They scarcely fought for him during the US and British invasion, despite dominating the officer corps and security services. But as foreign occupation was established and the army dissolved, they launched a guerrilla war.

The Sunni insurgency proved highly effective. They could not drive the Americans out, but neither could the US stabilise its rule. This still remains true.

"The Kurds were able to destabilise Iraq for 50 years," said the Iraqi commentator Ghassan Attiyah. "The Sunni can certainly do the same."

But the insurgency was of a peculiar type. All its organisations were against the occupation. Many were to a greater or lesser degree nationalist. But they were also Islamic and Salafi - Islamic Sunni fundamentalists - seeking to re-establish the pure faith by war against unbelievers and heretics. The latter include the Iraqi Shia, 60 per cent of the population.

From August 2003, suicide bombers attacked the Shia, killing several thousand as they queued outside army and police recruiting offices, or simply waited for work in the street. But sectarian war only really got underway in 2005.

There were two elections, on 30 January and 15 December, and a new constitution. The elections, the first boycotted by the Sunni, established the Shia and the Kurds as the new powers in Iraq. The constitution formalised the break up of the country into large regions.

The Sunni community in Baghdad became terrified. Death squads run by the Interior Ministry picked Sunni up on the street, and several days later their badly tortured bodies would be found on garbage dumps. There were tit-for-tat killings. But the blowing up of the Samarra shrine on 22 February this year led to the outbreak of wholesale sectarian warfare.

The real battle will be in the capital, where the Sunni are a minority - but a large one. Districts like al-Dohra in south Baghdad are becoming Sunni strongholds as the Shia flee.

There will be Sunni ministers in the government which is expected to be announced today in Baghdad. The US is eager to conciliate them if only because it fears a take-over of Iraq by Shia religious parties possibly sympathetic to Iran.

But there is no reason to think that Sunni political leaders speak for the insurgents. And in any case, the elections confirmed that the Sunni are only 20 per cent of the population. Therefore, their political strength depends on their ability to go on fighting.

The Independent


Source
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 10:57 am
Gels, Good post; the apologists for Bush continue their rhetoric about "progress," while more Iraqis are killed by Iragis. They still don't have a clue why their government has failed - and will continue to fail.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 11:05 am
Interesting, but certainly not surprising, that the two posts in the newly approved government that are as yet unfilled are: Interior and Defense.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 11:17 am
This longish article is slated to be published in tomorrow's edition of the NYT.

source today
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 11:21 am
Bush and his yes men have always shown incompetence in "everything" they touch; what are we to expect from this stupid group of people? They still don't understand the consequence of doing things wrong, and I doubt they will ever learn. There's no way to fix stupid.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 May, 2006 03:26 pm
us , iraq
recently there has been some speculation on the importance of osama in the hierarchy of islamic terrorists .
a/t to the asian times there is now another member of that terrorist organization ready to step in as a new leader . it seems that even if osama will fade from the scene some day , there is at least one new member ready to take up the vacancy .
the report by the 'asian times' claims that mullah omar is a strong new leader in the group.
hbg


...OSAMA'S CROWNPRINCE ?...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/14/2025 at 02:21:55