0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, TENTH THREAD.

 
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 10:39 am
This is funny,
Snow: Bush, Iraq Study Group meet not a 'deposition'. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061113/D8LC8IOG0.html "The study group, which is co-chaired by former Democratic Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana, was to meet not only with Bush, but also with Vice President Dick Cheney and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley. Talks were set separately with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, National Intelligence Director John Negroponte and CIA Director Michael Hayden." What's funny is everyone on that list is a war criminal and we have enough evidence to make that case.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 11:25 am
Quote:
While no one knows how many Iraqis have died, daily tallies of violent deaths by The Associated Press average nearly 45 a day. About half of them are unidentified bodies discovered on city streets or floating in the Tigris River.

The United Nations estimates about 100 violent deaths daily. The Iraqi health minister last week put civilian deaths over the entire 44 months since the U.S. invasion at about 150,000 -- close to the U.N. figure and about three times the previously accepted estimates of 45,000 to 50,000.

In morgues across Iraq where capacity stretches beyond thin, bodies are even being turned away.

"We have to reject them," Hadi al-Itabi of the morgue in Kut, southeast of Baghdad, said he told men who turned in the bodies of six slain border policeman last week. "We just don't have enough cold storage."

Iraq's bureaucracy of death is overwhelmed.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/11/12/baghdad.morgue.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

So many dying... they have to turn them away at the morgues.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 11:31 am
Gel, That 31 percent who still believe Bush will be effective during his last two years are diehard neocons that have not learned the truth about this administration, even after all the evidence says something else. They still don't realize that the American People have spoken, and the GOP is no longer in power. Those 31 percent will never learn the truth if their life depended on it.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 11:53 am
c.i. :
what are those 31 % going to do when president bush starts to negotiate with former members of "the axis of evil" ?
will they call the president a traitor ?

a/t the BBC-NEWS prime minister blair is also ready to "call for a dialogue" ( :wink: ) with former "axis of evil" states .

...PRIME MINISTER BLAIR CALLS FOR DIALOGUE...

is willy shakespeare would still be alive to-day , he would have plenty of material for both grim and funny plays - would probably be better stuff than what woodward is writing .
hbg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 11:56 am
hbg, Another "lie" from Bush will be nothing new. He fired Rummy, didn't he, after a few days after he said Rummy and Cheney are staying for two more years?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:01 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
hbg, Another "lie" from Bush will be nothing new. He fired Rummy, didn't he, after a few days after he said Rummy and Cheney are staying for two more years?


Yep he lied about that. Get over it now.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:02 pm
Why should anyone 'get over it?'

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:04 pm
imo there will be a few more things "to get over" .
must be like riding a porcupine for a while , telling everyone how enjoyable it is and trying to get off - OUCH !
i understand it hurts the tender parts . :wink:
hbg
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:40 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Why should anyone 'get over it?'

Cycloptichorn


Because getting your panties in a bunch about this particular incident makes you look like a fool.

Oh, wait, of course you guys can't get over it... sorry, I forgot.

carry on.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:40 pm
McG, What you seem to miss is the simple fact that a liar like Bush can't be trusted. That you continue to support such a liar speaks volumes about you!
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:41 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Why should anyone 'get over it?'

Cycloptichorn


Because getting your panties in a bunch about this particular incident makes you look like a fool.

Oh, wait, of course you guys can't get over it... sorry, I forgot.

carry on.


Anyone who looks like a fool in your eyes,

stands an excellent chance of being intelligent and morally correct in their actions;

becuase your judgement has been shown to be terrible.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:48 pm
McG, That you are unable to decipher a lie and liars, especially in our president, is a lot worse than getting a woman's panties in a bunch. You will never learn the difference. And talking about "fools...."
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 12:58 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
McG, What you seem to miss is the simple fact that a liar like Bush can't be trusted. That you continue to support such a liar speaks volumes about you!


Just so I understand you, once a liar, always a liar? Is that about right?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 01:00 pm
No. Some are habitual liars like Bush.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 01:03 pm
Bushie's lies are so blatant that most of those defending his lies are not confused but simply lying along with him. Not a sincere bunch but deadly serious in their disdain for those who dont accept their blueprint. You're either with them or with the terrorists.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 01:10 pm
no , not lies , just "misspoken" !

BBC defines "misspoken" :

"Misspoken: Mouth in foot disease"

misspoken • ppl.v. 1. (US only) To speak mistakenly, inappropriately, or rashly. 2. past part. of MISSPAKE, possibly.
USAGE: White House officials rushed to assure rattled currency traders that President Bush had "misspoken" when referring to the "devaluation" (lowering the exchange rate) of Japan's troubled yen. He, of course, meant "deflation" (falling prices) - a word which wouldn't have immediately knocked half a yen off the currency's dollar value.

ORIGIN: presumably a compression of the words "mistaken" and "spoken" (cf. to be spoketaken), it is used almost exclusively by unnamed political spokespeople (cf. misspokespeople) to defuse rows without calling any involved party stupid, a liar or worse.

EXAMPLE: "I think [General Schwarzkopf] may have misspoken. He's just not used to doing a lot of television": an unnamed Pentagon official reinterpreting a 1991 TV interview in which Stormin' Noman said he wanted to "annihilate" the Iraqi army.

NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH: Bushism. No longer denotes the President's linguistic gaffes (aka Bushlexia), the Washington Post has begun to talk of Bushism as an proper "ism" - like Thatcherism or Reaganism.

"Bushism - or in deference to his father, should we call it Dubya-ism? - may be the route to a new conservative ascendancy." EJ Dionne Jr. 27/01/02.

ALSO SEE: Bushisms as a particular and positive form of post-11 September political speech. Criticisms of the President's grip on English have slowed to a trickle in the US press since the terror attacks.

Time magazine now classifies such phrases as "evildoers" within the lexicon of Bushisms.

ALSO NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH: a mere misunderestimation of the power of words.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 01:14 pm
Misled. About 6 out of 10 Americans believe Bushie deliberately misled us into war. Deliberately misled is a good defininition of lying I think. A polite way of accusing Bushie of high war crimes.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 05:21 pm
Gelisgesti wrote:
Quote:
Sunday, November 12, 2006

Bush approval is at 31%. Americans think his presidency is over.
by Joe in DC - 11/12/2006 10:18:00 PM

Americans don't like the President anymore. Really, really don't like him. And, most Americans think his presidency is history:
...
Unfortunately, we've got two more years of the clown. Fortunately, Congress is controlled by the Democrats so he can be reined in.


Where are the polls on the approval ratings of the Republicans and of the Democrats?

It's hard to approve of either the neurotic Republicans or the psychotic Democrats. The elections were more about voting for whom one thinks is least worse and not for whom one thinks has the highest approval rating.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 06:01 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Gelisgesti wrote:
Quote:
Sunday, November 12, 2006

Bush approval is at 31%. Americans think his presidency is over.
by Joe in DC - 11/12/2006 10:18:00 PM

Americans don't like the President anymore. Really, really don't like him. And, most Americans think his presidency is history:
...
Unfortunately, we've got two more years of the clown. Fortunately, Congress is controlled by the Democrats so he can be reined in.


Where are the polls on the approval ratings of the Republicans and of the Democrats?

It's hard to approve of either the neurotic Republicans or the psychotic Democrats. The elections were more about voting for whom one thinks is least worse and not for whom one thinks has the highest approval rating.


Is that a birthmark on your head Ican .... looks like a letter 'L' MUWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAH
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Nov, 2006 07:00 pm
Gelisgesti wrote:

...
Is that a birthmark on your head Ican .... looks like a letter 'L' MUWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAH

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/18/2025 at 04:03:21