0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, TENTH THREAD.

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 06:52 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Oh, so you're going to completely ignore the fact that both you and Rush had it backwards about 'not taking the medicine to emphasize shaking?'

It may be odd to you, but one can hold an opinion without it being a political stance. I think that harming the environment through pollution is wrong. That's not a political stance. McCain thinks torture is wrong. That's not a political stance. It's a moral one.

Your ad hominem attacks are useless in light of your incredible ignorance. And I can find my nise just fine by myself, thanks.

Cycloptichorn


Holding an opinion and making a commercial supporting a ballot initiative are 2 far seperate things. I don't understand how you can't tell the difference other then the fact you don't wish to because it makes my point valid and yours not.

I wonder how Fox can continue his acting career if he is always showing the effects of his disease... oh, wait, I know... HE TAKES HIS MEDS!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 07:08 pm
Damn. Well, you sure don't let being wrong in every way stop you, I gotta give you that.
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 07:39 pm
snood, what did you think of the prez's speech today?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 07:45 pm
Nothing new. A few buzz words repeated over and over to create the impression of movement.

They've had 3 1/2 years to train Iraqis. We send 18 year olds into harm's way after 8 weeks of basic combat training. They keep saying they will "stand down when the Iraqis can stand up", but even the (varying estimates) 200,000-400,000 Iraqis they've supposedly trained, we can't "stand down" 1,000 troops? 100? 50? Who's shittin' who, here?
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 08:15 pm
Snood, you probably know from past posts that I was anti-war from before 2003. (I still wonder how so many of us doubted and wrote letters and "knew" that this was a disastrous foreign policy decision long before we found out we were right. How did so many of us "know"?)

I listened to Our Leader tonight and saw the first signs of softening. (I would be more impressed if it came earlier on in our three years of war, and not just two weeks before an election.) Well, truth can come late...better than not at all.

The issue to me is: what policy changes could get us out of the fix we are in. More troops in Baghdad? Well, I hear arguments from both sides. The always even-handed and interesting Lehrer report on Public TV every night (formerly McNeill-Lehrer) had Brezinski and another guy whose name I can't recall (but who is consistently reasoned and thoughtful) discussing what can or could be done in Iraq. Brez. said he was against the policy of Blame and Run, which would be one way to extricate ourselves.

Bottom line is that there is no easy way out, but at least the prez is softening his rhetoric and looking for wisdom outside of his circle. I am hopeful about reports from Brits who have turned over provinces, but these are small victories. We must look long-term, but how do we deal with a government-in-stasis there, locked in place by tribal loyalties.

How would any of us, pundits that we are, extricate ourselves from the mire we are bogged down in, in Iraq?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 08:17 pm
I say since none of the other predictions they made about Iraq came true, then they may be wrong about our leaving being the worst possible idea. I say we leave Iraq to the Iraqis.
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 09:39 pm
Who are "they," the predictors?

Who has a plan to extricate us from the swamp? I don't see too many dems doing a power-point plan for extraction. Trashing the R'pubs doesn't get the job done.

There are real difficulties with partition, in spite of Joe Biden's suggestions. There are huge imponderables about Iran's intervenions in a failed Iraq state if we pull out suddenly. I read new ideas and plans every day in the national media, but no one' s view is comprehensive. As one pundit said tonight,...So what happens if that doesn't work?

How can we, after all of these months and years, say Let's pull out now. That is so Immediate Gratification. I can understand the pain that leads to people saying that. (I understand their pain, because I was on the streets in January 2003 saying No No No.)

I am not sure I understand people who say The Iraqi people must stand up so we can stand down. This is a tribal country, and they are now relying on their militias, their friends, to defend them against the killing in the streets. We do not have the massive US forces to put in place a top-down control of the country.

Is there any way that we could identify a power, and put it in place, that would release locals from reliance on local guns? I wonder if this is possible. Is the only way the Iraqis can be controlled is from the top, the way Saddam did it?
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 09:47 pm
M.J. Fox

Maybe you should find out before you speak! Then you will not look as big a fool ...


Rainy Thursday desultory

I woke up angry
I woke up sad
I woke up wondering
how things got this bad
I woke up thinking
what demon I did loose
I woke up this morning
with nothing to lose
flesh colored manacles
posturepedic coffin
sealy epitaph
but not today God damn it
today I break free
this prison of flesh
will never hold me
I'll come up with something
you'll see
you'll see
this prison of flesh
will never conquer
me
hell no
I'm not ok
I lay deep in the thrall
of painless agony
and yourself?
laugh with me
pity for a time
does everything have to rhyme

2002
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 09:56 pm
Well, yeah.....
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Oct, 2006 10:41 pm
Hay ... wasn't a question, more like frustration. Didn't know there were this many PD experts on this thread .... funny
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 06:17 am
The (neo)conservatives just keep digging their own graves with remarks like the 9/11 widows and making fun and deriding Michael J Fox illness, it does not go over well on the general public and that can only be a good thing for liberals/democrats/independents and otherwise rational republicans (there are some out there, they are just being drowned out by these jokers) on the other side. Let them fall on their own swords.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 06:31 am
Sometimes I wonder if the administration just ignores reports and spout off misleading statements, or plain don't read them in the first place.



Quote:


(You can link to the actual report at the site by clicking on the image of the report to confirm the above if interested.)
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 06:40 am
Is the Iraqi government really in charge of their own country and military? Emphasis added by me.

Quote:
BAGHDAD (AP) - Iraqi special forces backed by U.S. advisers launched a raid into the capital's Sadr Shiite slum Wednesday trying to capture a top militia commander wanted for running a Shiite death squad. The prime minister disavowed the raid, saying he was not consulted before the attack in which at least four people were killed and 18 wounded.

The Americans said in an announcement that they were looking for a "top illegal armed group commander directing widespread death-squad activity throughout eastern Baghdad."

The military said that Mahdi Army militiamen fought back and the Americans called in an air strike and cordoned the sprawling east Baghdad region.

An angry Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki disavowed the raid, which the U.S. military said had been cleared with his government, and demanded an explanation.

"We will ask for clarification to what has happened. . . . We will review this issue with the Multinational Forces so that it will not be repeated," a frustrated al-Maliki said at a news conference.

Several hours later U.S. President George W. Bush acknowledged that al-Maliki may not have been consulted before the attack on Sadr City.


"We need co-ordinate with him. That makes sense to me. And there's a lot of operations taking place which means sometimes communications are not as good as they should be. And we'll continue to work very closely with the government to make sure communications are solid," Bush said at his own news conference.

Military action against militant militiamen in Sadr City is especially sensitive for al-Maliki, who draws considerable political support from Muqtada al-Sadr whose political organization runs the militia.

The U.S. military has not responded to e-mail requests for further information about the operation and whether the sought after militia figure had been captured or killed.

Well after nightfall, residents said all roads into the region remained blocked by U.S. and Iraqi forces. All cars were being searched by the U.S. soldiers.

A frustrated motorist waiting at one checkpoint jumped out of his car and called for al-Maliki to resign.

"Where is al-Maliki? It would be more honourable for him to resign. Why is he letting the Americans do this to us," the driver could be heard to scream.

Throughout the day and into the night, U.S. F-16 jet fighters growled across the Baghdad sky and at one point the report of tank cannon fire echoed across the city five times in quick succession.

The U.S. military said violence broke out when "Iraqi Army forces came under fire and had to defend themselves. They requested support from coalition aircraft which used precision gunfire only to eliminate the enemy threat," the military statement said.

Since then there has been no update from the U.S. forces, and cellphone service across Baghdad was inexplicably out of service most of Wednesday making contact with Sadr City, in the extreme northeast of Baghdad, impossible.

source
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 07:01 am
From this morning's paper:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1931693,00.html

CIA tried to silence EU on torture flights

Germany offered access to prisoner in Morocco if it quelled opposition

Richard Norton-Taylor
Thursday October 26, 2006
The Guardian

The CIA tried to persuade Germany to silence EU protests about the human rights record of one of America's key allies in its clandestine torture flights programme, the Guardian can reveal.
According to a secret intelligence report, the CIA offered to let Germany have access to one of its citizens, an al-Qaida suspect being held in a Moroccan cell. But the US secret agents demanded that in return, Berlin should cooperate and "avert pressure from EU" over human rights abuses in the north African country. The report describes Morocco as a "valuable partner in the fight against terrorism".

<more>
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 07:31 am
Bush on Iraq: "If We Can't Win, I'll Pull Us Out."
The president talks candidly to a group of conservative journalists. http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Farticle.nationalreview.com%2F%3Fq%3DZDg4M2NlZjdkMWY0M2EyMzUwZDE3OTc1YmQwYTgxNjY%3D
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 07:57 am
IMO the war was lost by virtue of the poor or rather nonexistent planning for the aftermath of the fighting which allowed for the insurgency to grow and become what it is presently.
Mr Bush and his sidekick Rumsfeld are responsible for that blunder. When I wonder will he come clean on that score.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 08:47 am
One should not criticize Rush on the subject of meds. He is, after all, very experienced in that area. In fact, he is widely known as "Oxy Moron."

Revel, thanks for the interesting material from the Peace Institute. Its conclusion seems unassailable.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 11:32 am
Bathe your egos in your opponent's fallibility while you can. It will distract you from your own fallibility. However, it will not solve any of our real problems:

(1) Stop al-Qaeda from growing in Afghanistan and in Iraq;

(2) Exterminate al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and in Iraq;

(3) Replace the governments in Afghanistan and in Iraq with governments that will not tolerate/allow al-Qaeda to again obtain sanctuary in Afghanistan and in Iraq.

I cannot see victory occurring for humanity until and unless we abandon the notion that we are morally obligated to minimize casualties among those non-combatants in the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants, while attempting to maximize casualties among deliberate killers of non-combatants. A far greater number of non-combatants will be killed if we fail, or are even slow, to exterminate the deliberate killers of non-combatants, than will die if we speedily exterminate the deliberate killers of non-combatants, while unavoidably killing some non-combatants in the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants.

We cannot infallibly tell the difference between non-combatants and deliberate killers of non-combatants. We do not possess even fallible means to read the minds of non-combatants and deliberate killers of non-combatants alike. However, covert tactics will enable us to adequately learn where deliberate killers of non-combatants and/or their ordnance are located.

Consequently, I recommend we openly and widely announce our intention to exterminate, and then proceed to exterminate, the deliberate killers of non-combatants, even when exterminating them results in the unavoidable killing of non-combatants that happen to be in the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants. This is exactly what we did in winning WWII in the fire bombing of Dresden and Hamburg Germany, and in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan. We thereby saved the lives of millions at the cost of the lives of hundreds of thousands.

By means of such tactics, we will succeed in getting a few non-combatants (maybe thousands) to escape the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants, and even themselves exterminate a few deliberate killers of non-combatants (maybe thousands) in the process of escaping the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 11:34 am
Quote:
I cannot see victory occurring for humanity until and unless we abandon the notion that we are morally obligated to minimize casualties among those non-combatants in the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants


Abandoning our morality is a loss for humanity, no matter what else happens.

You have a twisted view of the world, yaknow

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Oct, 2006 12:01 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
I cannot see victory occurring for humanity until and unless we abandon the notion that we are morally obligated to minimize casualties among those non-combatants in the vicinity of deliberate killers of non-combatants


Abandoning our morality is a loss for humanity, no matter what else happens.
...
Cycloptichorn

Thank you for responding to my post.

I think it an abandonment of our morality to not take that action which will achieve a net saving of human lives. I believe this is especially true when the net savings are probably hundreds of thousands of human lives.

If ever confronted with the opportunity to make a net saving of human lives at the cost of human lives, I pray I will seize that opportunity and do what I must.

I recommend you see the movie "Guardian." When faced with the enormously tough decision to save a few human lives only if others are left behind to die, the Coast Guard does what it must and saves as many human lives as it can.

We are faced with a far tougher situation. We know that if we do not do what we must that kills human lives to reduce the number of human lives lost, far more human lives will be lost.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 11:50:37