0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, TENTH THREAD.

 
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 05:34 am
blatham wrote:
Quote:
Gloom descends on Iraqi leaders as civil war looms
Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:16 PM BST
Email This Article | Print This Article | RSS [-] Text [+] By Mariam Karouny

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi leaders have all but given up on holding the country together and, just two months after forming a national unity government, talk in private of "black days" of civil war ahead.

Signalling a dramatic abandonment of the U.S.-backed project for Iraq, there is even talk among them of pre-empting the worst bloodshed by agreeing to an east-west division of Baghdad into Shi'ite and Sunni Muslim zones, senior officials told Reuters.

Tens of thousands have already fled homes on either side.


"Iraq as a political project is finished," one senior government official said -- anonymously because the coalition under Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki remains committed in public to the U.S.-sponsored constitution that preserves Iraq's unity.
link


Well blatham, it looks like Bush's foreign policy is a smashing success.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 06:05 am
Here's an interesting development. What will we do if Turkey invades Iraq? For years the Kurds have been fighting guerrilla wars against Iran, Turkey and Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Their war against Turkey has been, at times, intense. It's still continuing.

Quote:
Turkey Announces Readiness for Iraq
Category: SOFTPEDIA NEWS :: World

If the US does nothing to fight Turkish Kurdish guerillas there
By: Ruxandra Adam, News Editor

Turkish officials announced today that their country is now fully prepared to go into Iraq, if American, as well as Iraqi, forces do not combat Turkish Kurdish guerilla troops in the area. However, many analysts have stated that such a political and military move would force Turkey to be at odds with the United States.

This decision comes amid growing pressure placed on Turkey to act according to the critical situation currently unfolding, after 15 soldiers, police officers and guards, had been killed in armed clashed with Kurdish guerilla troops in the southeastern part of Turkey in the past week. "The government is really in a bind. On the one hand, they don't want things to break down with the United States. On the other hand, the public is crying for action", Seyfi Tashan, director of the Foreign Policy Institute at Bilkent University in Ankara stated.

Experts calmed the increasingly aggressive statements released by Turkish diplomats, in order to appease the anger of the public opinion and apply pressure on the US and Iraq to do something against the Turkish guerillas. Turkish diplomats had stated that they would take the matter into their own hands should US and Iraq do nothing about it.

On the other hand, according to an American diplomat, who liked to keep his anonymity, US officials in Turkey and in Washington discussed the matter with Turkish representatives and military commanders in order to urge them to cooperate with the Washington administration in order to combat guerillas and not act alone. He added that the Turkish military department has had plans for fighting guerillas in the northern part of Iraq for a long time now and these include airstrikes on military bases, attacks carried by commando units and a larger-scale ground offensive.

However, US diplomats, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, are against any military operations in northern Iraq, one of the stable areas in the country, without further prior joint discussions and consultations with US officials on the matter.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 07:07 am
Quote:
July 20, 2006
The Horrifying Reality Slowly Begins to Break Through
Story:

Republican lawmakers acknowledge that it is no longer tenable to say the news media are ignoring the good news in Iraq and painting an unfair picture of the war. In the first half of this year, 14,338 Iraqi civilians died violent deaths, according to a new report by the U.N. Assistance Mission for Iraq. Last month alone, 3,149 civilians were killed -- an average of more than 100 a day.






Read on ...
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 07:21 am
It's all so bad there is almost nothing left to say except God help the Iraqis.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 09:04 am
Iraqi Official Tells Reuters That Country May Be Split Into
Iraqi Official Tells Reuters That Country May Be Split Into Parts
By E&P Staff
Published: July 21, 2006 1:25 PM ET

As one of the bloodiest weeks of the war neared an end, Iraqi officials told Reuters reporters Ahmed Rasheed and Mariam Karouny that despair was setting in and chances of averting all-out civil war were now thin.

"Iraq as a political project is finished," a top government official told Reuters. "The parties have moved to Plan B," the official said, saying Sunni, ethnic Kurdish and majority Shi'ite blocs were looking at ways to divide power and resources.

"There is serious talk of Baghdad being divided into east and west," said the official, who has long been a proponent of the present government's objectives. "We are extremely worried." Other "senior leaders" echoed this view.

Officials and delegates from a range of political, tribal, regional and religious groups will meet in Baghdad's Green Zone government on Saturday for the first meeting of the National Reconciliation Commission.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 10:17 am
Another Bush success; ignorance is divine. Makes one wonder where all these Bush apologists and supporters continue to come from?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 02:33 pm
xingu wrote:
Ican

IBC sucks and is no where close to reality. Even the UN says it body count of 14,338 is undercounted. ...

The UN "sucks and is no where close to reality." The UN's failure to implement its many resolutions about Iraq prior to the Iraq invasion, the UN's theft of food money from the Iraqi people in the Oil for Food scandal, the UN's rape of African girls and women while pretending to peace keep, the UN's support of its civil rights commission made up of representatives from civil rights abusing nations, the UN's exaggerated count of Iraqi civilian violent deaths in 2003, 2004, and 2005, et cetera, mark the UN an unreliable source of information -- that is, mark the UN an organization that "sucks."

IBC counts not only include deaths reported by various news agencies, but also include morgue counts that they obtain independently of news reports. Check back through daily listings at the end of several months and see for yourself. Even if IBC's counts are X% -- where X is whatever value less than 100% you favor -- of true counts, the IBC counts nonetheless reveal true trends in the monthly counts ... but you can't (or won't) understand that, can (or will) you. You are too much wedded to liebral pseudology to even entertain the possibility that I am right on this. You remind me of spouses who refuse to acknowledge even blatant evidence of their spouses criminal or otherwise dishonest behavior.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 02:42 pm
ican711nm: Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:45 am Post: 2133950 - wrote:
cicerone imposter: Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:48 pm Post: 2130462 - wrote:
ican, ... it doesn't matter what I think; it matters a whole lot what Arabs/Muslims think. ...

I infer, cice, that you think:
(1) "it doesn't matter what [you] think";

(2) "it matters a whole lot what Arabs/Muslims think".

Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 06:40 pm
ican, Your calcified brain just doesn't understand what most of the Arab League have been saying about 1) our support for Israel, and 2) our continued killings of innocent Arabs/Muslims. What they think will impact what happens to the war in the Middle East. What I say will have none.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Jul, 2006 11:21 pm
From the BBC on July 23, 2006:

Iraq prisoner abuse 'was routine'
The torture of prisoners in US custody in Iraq was authorised and routine even after the Abu Ghraib scandal came to light, a US-based rights group says.
Soldiers' accounts show that detainees routinely faced severe beatings, sleep deprivation and other abuses for much of 2003-2005, Human Rights Watch says.

Soldiers who tried to complain about the abuse were rebuffed or ignored.

But a Pentagon spokesman said 12 reviews had found there was no policy condoning or encouraging abuse.

"The standard of treatment is and always has been humane treatment of detainees in [Department of Defence] custody," Lt Col Mark Ballesteros told Reuters news agency.

John Sifton, author of the Human Rights Watch (HRW) report, said the accounts given to the group by former US soldiers revealed the opposite.

"These accounts rebut US government claims that torture and abuse in Iraq was unauthorised and exceptional - on the contrary, it was condoned and commonly used," he said.

Photos showing US soldiers abusing and sexually humiliating Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad in 2004 shocked the world.

Eleven US soldiers have now been convicted in connection with the abuse. No senior officers have so far been convicted.

Stress positions

The HRW report gives first-hand accounts of abuses at a detention centre at Baghdad airport called Camp Nama, as well as a facility near Mosul airport and a base near al-Qaim on the Syrian border.

An interrogator posted at Mosul in 2004 told HRW that he and his fellow interrogators had been told by the officer in charge of their unit to use abuse techniques on some detainees.

ABU GHRAIB CONVICTIONS
May 04: Spc Jeremy Sivits - 1 year jail, bad conduct discharge
Sept 04: Spc Armin Cruz - 8 months jail, bad conduct discharge
Oct 04: Sgt Ivan Frederick - 8 years jail, dishonourable discharge
Oct 04: Spc Megan Ambuhl - fine, other than honourable discharge
Jan 05: Spc Charles Graner - 10 years jail, dishonourable discharge
Feb 05: Spc Roman Krol - 10 months jail, bad conduct discharge
Feb 05: Sgt Javal Davis - 6 months jail, bad conduct discharge
Sept 05: Pte Lynndie England - 3 years jail, dishonourable discharge
May 05: Spc Sabrina Harman - 180 days jail, bad conduct discharge
Mar 06: Sgt Michael Smith - 179 days jail, bad conduct discharge
Jun 06: Sgt Santos Cardona - 90 days labour, $7,200 fine

He described how they used dogs to intimidate the detainees, had them walking on their knees in the gravel and standing for extended periods with arms outstretched holding water bottles.

An interrogator at Camp Nama said the use of abuse techniques was commonplace - authorisation forms could be easily prepared for commanding officers to sign.

"I never saw a sheet that wasn't signed," the soldier said.


HRW gives accounts of instances where soldiers who were concerned by the abuses were thwarted from reporting it.

One military police guard at the facility near Qaim, who took his concerns to an officer, was reportedly told: "You need to go ahead and drop this, sergeant."

Geneva Conventions

HRW says its findings show that criminal investigations of abuses need to follow the military chain of command, rather than focusing on lower-ranked soldiers.

The New York-based organisation calls on the US Congress to appoint an independent commission to investigate the extent of the problem, and urges US President George W Bush to appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of the abuse.

"It is now clear that leaders were responsible for abuses in Iraq," Mr Sifton said. "It's time for them to be held accountable".

The Bush administration has faced intense and sustained international criticism for its treatment of prisoners - in Iraq, Afghanistan and at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.

Earlier this month, the White House announced that all US military detainees would be treated in line with the minimum standards of the Geneva Conventions.

The shift in policy came almost two weeks after the US Supreme Court ruled that the conventions applied to detainees.

The Geneva Conventions, which were passed in the wake of World War II, are meant to guarantee minimum standards of protection for non-combatants and former combatants in war.



Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/5206908.stm
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 06:52 am
ican wrote:
The UN "sucks and is no where close to reality." The UN's failure to implement its many resolutions about Iraq prior to the Iraq invasion, the UN's theft of food money from the Iraqi people in the Oil for Food scandal, the UN's rape of African girls and women while pretending to peace keep, the UN's support of its civil rights commission made up of representatives from civil rights abusing nations, the UN's exaggerated count of Iraqi civilian violent deaths in 2003, 2004, and 2005, et cetera, mark the UN an unreliable source of information -- that is, mark the UN an organization that "sucks."


A patently stupid response. None of the things you accuse the UN of have anything to do with its method of body counting. The UN is a very big organization and it's easy to find some fault in it. That has nothing to do with its tabulation of deaths in Iraq.

ican wrote:
IBC counts not only include deaths reported by various news agencies, but also include morgue counts that they obtain independently of news reports. Check back through daily listings at the end of several months and see for yourself. Even if IBC's counts are X% -- where X is whatever value less than 100% you favor -- of true counts, the IBC counts nonetheless reveal true trends in the monthly counts ... but you can't (or won't) understand that, can (or will) you. You are too much wedded to liebral pseudology to even entertain the possibility that I am right on this. You remind me of spouses who refuse to acknowledge even blatant evidence of their spouses criminal or otherwise dishonest behavior.

Now this is really pathetic. Here is their methology.
Quote:
Casualty figures are derived from a comprehensive survey of online media reports and eyewitness accounts. Where these sources report differing figures, the range (a minimum and a maximum) are given. All results are independently reviewed and error-checked by at least two members of the Iraq Body Count project team in addition to the original compiler before publication.

For a source to be considered acceptable to this project it must comply with the following standards: (1) site updated at least daily; (2) all stories separately archived on the site, with a unique url (see Note 1 below); (3) source widely cited or referenced by other sources; (4) English Language site; (5) fully public (preferably free) web-access.

The project relies on the professional rigour of the approved reporting agencies. It is assumed that any agency that has attained a respected international status operates its own rigorous checks before publishing items (including, where possible, eye-witness and confidential sources). By requiring that two independent agencies publish a report before we are willing to add it to the count, we are premising our own count on the self-correcting nature of the increasingly inter-connected international media network.

Note 1. Some sites remove items after a given time period, change their urls, or place them in archives with inadequate search engines. For this reason it is project policy that urls of sources are NOT published on the iraqbodycount site.


Data extraction policy is based on 3 criteria, some of which work in opposite directions.

a. Sufficient information must be extracted to ensure that each incident is differentiated from proximate incidents with which it could be potentially confused.

b. Economy of data extraction is required, for efficiency of both production and public scrutiny.

c. Data extraction should be uniform, so that the same information is available for the vast majority of incidents. This is best guaranteed by restricting the number of items of information per incident to the core facts that most news reports tend to include.

The pragmatic tensions in the above have led to the decision to extract the following information only for each incident:
·Date of incident
·Time of incident
·Location of incident
·Target as stated by military sources
·Weapon (munitions or delivery vehicle)
·Minimum civilian deaths (see Note 2)
·Maximum civilian deaths (see Note 2)
·Sources (at least two sources from the list in section 2 above)

Reliability of data extraction will be increased by ensuring that each data extraction is checked and signed off by two further independent scrutineers prior to publication, and all data entries will be kept under review should further details become available at a later date.

SOURCE

Now read this real carefully ican. Each incident, before it can be included in the IBC database must be reported by not one but two news agencies. Only incidents are reported. Morgue reports from the different morgues around the country are not reported.

Read again; INCIDENTS not MORGUE REPORTS.

How many violent deaths do you think are committed without any news agency knowing or even bothering to report about, let alone two agencies. Remember these reporters can't leave the Green Zone unless heavily escorted, which tells you who controls this country.

Please go into IBC and show me the daily or monthly morgue reports of all violent deaths from all the morgues in Iraq. I couldn't find it. I couldn't find one morgue report. The only thing IBC puts out are incidents that are reported by two or more news sources, and they don't include non-English news sites.

So by your reckoning the most comprehensive tally of all Iraqi civilian deaths is done by English speaking web news sites of incidents that are reported by two or more news sources.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 09:10 am
I am just as bad as anyone else, but I read something in crooks in Liars that sort of Jerked me back a pace.

Quote:
Cafferty: While the media remains mesmerized by the fighting in Israel and Lebanon, more than a hundred people a day are being killed in Iraq…

Wolf: It is simply horrendous. The slaughter, the bloodshed that's continuing even as we monitor by and large what's happening elsewhere in the Middle East.

Cafferty: What's our plan? Do we have one for dealing with this? I mean it's degenerating into some sort of sub-human nightmare.


source

I imagine that the Bush administration and the entire republican party would like for everybody to forget about the dying Iraq.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 09:29 am
I am just as bad as anyone else, but I read something in crooks in Liars that sort of Jerked me back a pace.

Quote:
Cafferty: While the media remains mesmerized by the fighting in Israel and Lebanon, more than a hundred people a day are being killed in Iraq…

Wolf: It is simply horrendous. The slaughter, the bloodshed that's continuing even as we monitor by and large what's happening elsewhere in the Middle East.

Cafferty: What's our plan? Do we have one for dealing with this? I mean it's degenerating into some sort of sub-human nightmare.


source

I imagine that the Bush administration and the entire republican party would like for everybody to forget about the dying Iraq. On the other hand all the dying in both places is just horrible you sometimes wonder how or if it is all going to end.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 09:31 am
I don't know that Bush wants to forget Iraq. It's just there's so much going on in the Israel/Lebanon conflict that can lead to unforseen consequences they don't have time to do much in Iraq. Bush is either to weak or unconcerned about stopping Israel from attacking Lebanon. What's worrisome is where will all this bloodshed lead to? Will it spread and become uncontrollable? That's one thing about war, it takes on a life of its own and becomes a monster that controls you when all the time you thought you could control it. Iraq is a prime example.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 10:14 am
xingu, Bush isn't unconcerned about about the Israel-Lebanon conflict; this administration was able to provide more weapons to Israel faster than removing American citizens to safety out of Lebanon. Go figure why republicans still support Bush.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 10:23 am
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 10:24 am
The Bush hypocrisy continues...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v97/imposter222/img057.jpg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 10:25 am
What the above cartoon depicts so well is the size of Bush's brain.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 11:17 am
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 01:00 pm
A2K wouldn't post the words around morgue.

I'll try again later.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 10:39:01