McGentrix wrote:Gelisgesti wrote:OCCOM BILL wrote:No. All security comes at liberty's expense.
Let me see if I understand ... I give up all my freedom and you provide me with security.
First of all what need have I of security in a cage... after I abandon all freedoms ... what is left?
Second, how am I to deal with the next 'protector' I run into with a bigger head of cheese?
You have obvioulsy missed the point, whether purposefully or not.
Do you lock your doors at night? Do you take your keys out of your car? Do you have a bank account?
You need those protections because
others do not respect your freedoms. You use safegaurds to keep your possessions and yourself safe.
The all or none proposition you are expressing is what I would expect from a 5 year old. You are not a 5 year old are you?
Your 'spin' is as usual, based on providing a basis for an arguement that fails the test of logic. The doors, keys, bank account options are based on the understanding that my personal freedoms remain just that, personal freedoms aka ... liberties. These freedoms are granted to each member of a society by all the members of said society to the benefaction of all.
The fewer liberties a society have, the closer to anarchy they slide.
All or none? Are you sure that your criteria for which freedoms to give up and which to keep is a choice you want somone else to make.
Once started where will the erosion stop?
In short, I retain the right to leave my car unlocked with the key in the ignition and my bank book on the seat. I also support the right to be stupid.