Roxxanne,
So you are sying that when a woman goes into labor,but BEFORE the baby is born,it does not qualify as a human being or a baby?
So,it would be ok to kill it then?
Or,we could do like they are supposed to do in China.As long as the babies head has crowned,but before it is completely out,we can go ahead and kill it,because we dont like its sex,or for any other reason.
After all,it isnt human.
Interesting only in that the author starts his piece by telling a BIG lie. Since when can someone die who hasn't been born? Quite a unique concept there!
Roxxxanne,
You think a "fetus" is dead in the womb? You may not consider it a human being but it is alive and can therefore die or be killed.
Momma Angel wrote:No offense meant here Roxxxane, but until God Himself tells me it is NOT a human being, I'm erring on the side of caution and considering it a human being.
I talked to God yesterday. She told that the fetus is not a human being until she instills the fetus with a soul. She said she considers when to do that on a case to case basis but never before the second trimester. She told me a woman considering an abortio n should check with her directly to see when the soul instillation is scheduled.
Roxxxanne,
Granted, but are you going to tell me that a fetus in the womb is the same thing as bacteria?
mysteryman wrote:Roxxanne,
So you are sying that when a woman goes into labor,.
Why is it so hard for you ant-rights people to understand that a person becomes a person by BEING BORN!
Roxxxanne,
In the other abortion thread (I think it was the other one, getting confused here) I asked a question. Perhaps you will answer it.
If science proved that it was indeed a human being from conception would you still feel the woman's right to choice trumps the child's right to be born?
Momma Angel wrote:Roxxxanne,
Granted, but are you going to tell me that a fetus in the womb is the same thing as bacteria?
Doesn't matter, a fertilized egg is not a human being.
Roxxxanne wrote:mysteryman wrote:Roxxanne,
So you are sying that when a woman goes into labor,.
Why is it so hard for you ant-rights people to understand that a person becomes a person by BEING BORN!
Well isnt going into labor a sure sign that the baby is being born?
And yes,I know about false labor.I was reffering to real labor,when the baby is born.
Momma Angel wrote:Roxxxanne,
In the other abortion thread (I think it was the other one, getting confused here) I asked a question. Perhaps you will answer it.
If science proved that it was indeed a human being from conception would you still feel the woman's right to choice trumps the child's right to be born?
Science can't prove it is a human being because it is already known that it's not. You need to bone up on your biology.
Roxxxanne wrote:Momma Angel wrote:Roxxxanne,
In the other abortion thread (I think it was the other one, getting confused here) I asked a question. Perhaps you will answer it.
If science proved that it was indeed a human being from conception would you still feel the woman's right to choice trumps the child's right to be born?
Science can't prove it is a human being because it is already known that it's not. You need to bone up on your biology.
That's not even an intellectually honest statement. The debate about when life begins rages on, even among scientists.
mysteryman wrote:Roxxxanne wrote:mysteryman wrote:Roxxanne,
So you are sying that when a woman goes into labor,.
Why is it so hard for you ant-rights people to understand that a person becomes a person by BEING BORN!
Well isnt going into labor a sure sign that the baby is being born?
And yes,I know about false labor.I was reffering to real labor,when the baby is born.
It is irrelevant, a person isn't a person until birth.
Roxxxanne,
How can you say that? So ten minutes before a child is born it's not a person?
While its being born it isnt a person,according to Roxxanne.
I wonder how many of the pro-abortion people on here secretly hope that their parents had abortions.
