Abortion

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

I recently read that something like 48% of the women who have had abortions, have had more than one.

This has shaken to the core my belief that a women's decision about continuing a pregnancy is one which is taken with the most profound deliberation.

If almost half of the women having abortions are on their second abortion, in a world where contraceptives are incredibly easy to obtain, what does this tell us about the current societal application of abortion?

If this statistic is valid then I utterly reject the histrionics of Senator Fienstein concerning back alley abortions using rusted hangers.

Anyone who goes back to the abortion clinic for a second time, did not have a life altering experience with the first one.

If this statistic is accurate (and I am researching it as we post) then it has moved a Pro-Choice Conservative to the Pro-Life camp.

Heh.

Has is "shaken" your beliefs "to the core"?

News flash: most aborted fetuses are minute clumps non-sentient cells. It's bizarre that you place any importance on them at all. Hell, we could have drive through abortion clinics then chop the leftover fetuses up for dog food for all I care. There is no reason - repeat, no reason - to get all sentimental over this ****.

Finn,

I thought it was better when you were being honest about why you object to abortion!!

Anon

Anon-Voter wrote:

Finn,

I thought it was better when you were being honest about why you object to abortion!!

Anon

And I thought it was better when you made sense Anon.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

Finn,

I thought it was better when you were being honest about why you object to abortion!!

Anon

And I thought it was better when you made sense Anon.

Now we know what you really want is pretty white babies for Joe and Mary Whitefolks ... You know that those little black and disabled babies are the ones that no one wants. Remember when you said that, or would you like a link??

Anon

Anon-Voter wrote:

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

Finn,

I thought it was better when you were being honest about why you object to abortion!!

Anon

And I thought it was better when you made sense Anon.

Now we know what you really want is pretty white babies for Joe and Mary Whitefolks ... You know that those little black and disabled babies are the ones that no one wants. Remember when you said that, or would you like a link??

Anon

Provide a link for all I care.

I stand by everything I've posted.

That you didn't understand what I wrote says nothing about what I wrote.

Get a life.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:

Finn,

I thought it was better when you were being honest about why you object to abortion!!

Anon

And I thought it was better when you made sense Anon.

Now we know what you really want is pretty white babies for Joe and Mary Whitefolks ... You know that those little black and disabled babies are the ones that no one wants. Remember when you said that, or would you like a link??

Anon

Provide a link for all I care.

I stand by everything I've posted.

That you didn't understand what I wrote says nothing about what I wrote.

Get a life.

I have a great life Finn, Thanks for the concern!! You're a real humanitarian!!

Here Ya go Finn ... Need some highlights, or can you find your quotes ok??

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1732562#1732562
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1733604#1733604

Anon

IronLionZion wrote:

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

I recently read that something like 48% of the women who have had abortions, have had more than one.

This has shaken to the core my belief that a women's decision about continuing a pregnancy is one which is taken with the most profound deliberation.

If almost half of the women having abortions are on their second abortion, in a world where contraceptives are incredibly easy to obtain, what does this tell us about the current societal application of abortion?

If this statistic is valid then I utterly reject the histrionics of Senator Fienstein concerning back alley abortions using rusted hangers.

Anyone who goes back to the abortion clinic for a second time, did not have a life altering experience with the first one.

If this statistic is accurate (and I am researching it as we post) then it has moved a Pro-Choice Conservative to the Pro-Life camp.

Heh.

Has is "shaken" your beliefs "to the core"?

News flash: most aborted fetuses are minute clumps non-sentient cells. It's bizarre that you place any importance on them at all. Hell, we could have drive through abortion clinics then chop the leftover fetuses up for dog food for all I care. There is no reason - repeat, no reason - to get all sentimental over this ****.

Whoa - and here comes IronLionZion to engage me pages into the thread.
Cool.

To answer your question, yes it has "shaken" my beliefs "to the core."

Now wait, was that a real question or a smart-ass rhetorical question?

Hmmmnnnnh...maybe IronLionZion was not really interested in an exchange of ideas.

Might as well be dog food huh?

On the one hand I commend you for your lack of artifice, but on the other I condemn you for your lack of humanity.

God have mercy on your soul.

ILZ,
The key word there is MOST.
I agree that "non-sentient clumps of cells",probably dont matter to some people.
BUT what about the other abortions,the ones that dont fall under that category?

Shouldnt they be allowed to grow?
After all,you just admitted that those kinds of abortions do occur.

Most aborted fetuses are non-sentient clumps of cells.

IronLionZion wrote:

Most aborted fetuses are non-sentient clumps of cells.

Your position, it seems, is based on this belief. But how could you know if this is really true?

IronLionZion wrote:

Most aborted fetuses are non-sentient clumps of cells.

Your position, it seems, is based on this belief. But how could you know if this is really true?

The child, however, born or unborn, is a human being with unalienable rights and is ethically owned by nobody.

Foxfyre wrote:

The child, however, born or unborn, is a human being with unalienable rights and is ethically owned by nobody.

NEWS FLASH: IT IS A NON-SENTIENT CLUMP OF CELLS WITHOUT EVEN THE CAPABILITY TO DEVELOP ON IT'S OWN.