O'Reilly - "Very Secret Plan to Diminish Christianity"

And the snow shall not fall on the sidewalks or streets.

Don't mind the snow, so much.

I do.

Yes, I remain "rigidly ignorant" of "homogenous Muslim/Islamic neighborhoods" in France, because they do not exist.

Take the example of Clichy-sous-Bois - the place where the riots first erupted in all their violence; there, immigrants make up about half - officially - or more than half - unofficially - of the population, and even that includes West-Africans, former Yugoslavs, Asians as well as North-Africans and Turks.

Its much like the "tens of thousands" of imams that Fox News reported to be about to be deported from Holland after Theo van Gogh's murder, who also never existed.

then again, we have right here in the US of A "sleeper cells" we are engaged with who also don't exist. Well, at least, there is no evidence offered that they exist. The only 'evidence" that they exist is that there is a budget in place to wage war against them so they must exist, right?

Explanation of separatists, calls for millet, explanation of Muslim role in no-go areas.

dys--

The members of cells we have arrested here are of no consequence to you? I know it's cool to seem unconcerned, but did 9/11 concern you? Running around afraid of everything--and blaming everything of Arabs or Muslims is ridiculous--but acting so nonchalant about it, IMO, is just as bad.

OK, what cells? I don't mean alleged cells. I mean actual cells. I am seriously beginning to believe there is NO international terrorist organization called Al Qaeda but rather, a smallish criminal gang organization with world-wide imitators. As far as I can tell, the various "bombings" have all been locals run amok of their own accord.

Lackawanna, for one.

The upstate New York railway?

Very funny!!




<jes gets bonus points!>




<but no cigar>



<hee>

Lackawanna: More than a railway!

Counterterrorism officials never figured out the mystery that consumed them through the long, tense, terror-obsessed summer of 2002: What, if anything, did Al Qaeda have in mind for its Lackawanna recruits? In fact, the federal prosecutor whose office won the guilty pleas, Michael A. Battle, does not call them a terrorist cell. "It's a heavy burden to prove," he said, "and I wasn't prepared to do that."

dys,

Don't you realize your questions are unpatriotic and hurt the morale of our troops in Iraq? Have you forgotten 9/11 and why we went into Iraq? You must be a traitor of some kind.

(Figured I'd jump in before the usual suspects piled on you.) :wink:

So one can assume then, that you do not approve of O'Reilly's method? Especially given the lies of which he has been accused, and which have been demonstrated, and the allegations of which were successfully defended in the Fox "News" failed law suit--one can assume you recognize and condemn O'Reilly's habitual slant in "news" commentary?

Leaving aside for a moment O'Reilly's widely-recognized stupidity and bias . . . i continue to took in here for progress reports on the nefarious plot (so many plots, so little time ! ! !) . . . has anyone seen christians getting noticably smaller? Is the effort working?

When, oh when, will they disover the difference between news reporters and pundits???

O'Bill is one of the most pompous, self-congratulatory people on TV--one of--and I don't watch him regularly. I may catch him as I flip channels and I may pause. I change it when he starts stroking himself for the camera--which is ususally within three or four minutes.

But

1) He's not always wrong, and
2) he promotes himself as a commentator, not a journalist.

Report on diminuation of Christmas/Christians--

The liberals attempts to make Christianity smaller has resulted in a backlash. It is now strengthening due to the anti-Christian aggression.

More later.

And Terry Gross is an interviewer . . . rarely, though, have i observed you to be so obsessed . . .

But the christians themselves, are they getting smaller?

I have probably seemed just as obsessed on other "Bias in News" threads. I look on this conversation as part of that greater debate.

Haven't decided on size of current Christians, yet.

What always amazes me about "bias in the news" threads is the constant accusation of liberal domination of the mainstream media, when people such as Conrad Black and Ruppert Murdoch have owned so much of the media for so long, and are well known to impose their views on editors and newsroom production staff.

And are you aiding or abetting?