FreeDuck wrote:Momma Angel wrote:I don't understand why some of you can't seem to understand what Lash is saying.
It seems to be perfectly ok for some to belittle others for their beliefs. But, when they are called on it, it is called humorous teasing? Well, it's not funny to me when anyone belittles me for my beliefs.
Just as no one likes to be belittled because of race or anything else. What is the difference? It seems to be ok for some at some times but not at others.
That is a double standard I have seen often in these threads. Not everyone does it, but plenty do.
It's hard for you to see how Lash's question was pure bait and when dlowan tried to answer it light-heartedly she brought out some bits from another unrelated conversation in an effort to trip her up? How you could read deb's post and take that to mean that she advocates belittling people (or inanimate objects) for their religion is beyond me. I'd love to have it clarified, but there will be no clarification here tonight it seems.
When it comes to Lash's nasty games there is no clarification, FreeDuck, since her only aim is to be as unpleasant as she can manage, and without intent to have any sort of discussion, which is why I ignore her for the most part these days.
I have no idea what might possibly need clarification, since it seems to me there is no possible correlation between banter about religion and using it as a weapon against helpless prisoners who are being misused in other ways as well.
To belittle anyone's religion, if it is deeply meaningful to them, in circumstances where they are utterly powerless and afraid is disgusting.
To pretend to equate this with teasing is, to me, evidence of such moral blindness that I do not consider it worth arguing about it. The person who would seriously put that forward is not amenable to reasonable debate on the matter, or simply attempting to have a chance to pretend moral outrage so as to have a psychodrama.
I leave others to makle up their own minds re which is the case here.
Either way, it is ridiculous to pretend to debate it, since no reasonable debate is intended.
Personally, even when I was religious, I would not have been troubled by abuse of the bible, it is just a book, to christians, in its physical form. To Muslims it is a terrible thing to abuse it. Lash says this is ridiculous. Shrugs. Equally, I regard christian and muslim belief in the god they espouse as ridiculous, yet Lash, for instance, wishes to privilege her superstition above the muslim version. So it goes.
I would not choose to physically abuse anyone's holy book in front of them. To do such seems to me infantile and unnecessary . To do so when people are in your power utterly is a much darker thing, I believe.
When people are free and under no duress I see no harm in teasing them, although, in real life, I would not do such to a religious person if I saw it really distressed them, although I would certainly not lie down and say nothing if they were trying to foist their stuff upon me, or if were using it to abuse others... (eg fomenting hatred of gays, hatred of other religions etc.)
If people here do not like having their beliefs challenged, that can look away.....this is a forum for doing just that, and if they do not like having the odd joke made about their religion, they can look away too.
A number of the christians here have no qualms about shitting on, for instance, Islam, and expressing unpleasant prejudices about others.
If they then squawk about others then criticising their religion, they are the hypocritical fools I take them to be, in spades.
Meanwhile, it's time to crap on the agnostics, like me!
Bastiches we are, freeloading on others' holidays!!!
I demand holidays for Ramadan, Passover, all the important Indian festivals......what other holidays can we freeload on?
More religious holidays, I say!!!! Come on jews and muslims, demand equality in holidays! We agnostics will support you, that is, I think we will!