Libby indicted

Lol!!

I am struck by how often an overwhelmed A2K poster resorts to the simple acronym of LOL as some sort of derisive coup de grace. Of course an imbecile playing with his or her feces might find it irresistable to laugh out loud, but somehow in the A2K world the acronym attempts to take on more substance.(Look forward, our dear dlowan has resorted to the device at least three times in a row)

Writhe and wriggle as you may Finn, you made an incredibly blindly stupod and prejudiced statement, a clear example of your patriotic chayuvinistic attitude to the rest of the world.

Stupod and stupid, chayvaunistic and chauvinistic. No matter how you choose to spell these terms, it is clear that you have contempt for my stupidity and chauvinism. Let's stipulate that this is the case and move on. Either respond to my specific points or disengage entirely. Otherwise you are just hysterically ranting.

Such bigoted blindness is dangerous in the modern world...that so many Americans seem to have it (I gather you are taught it in your schools? And not all of you grow up and see that there is a world?) is especially dangerous in a super power. It is dangerous wherever its stupidity is mixed with power.

This paragraph is so overwhelmingly irrational that I find it hard to respond.

Where do I begin?

Decry bigotry while engaging in it. Is this peculiarly dlown or familiar to all Leftists?

Although you show no desire to reign it in, let me try to do so on your behalf (and thereby promote an intelligent debate, even if it must be with myself).

If Americans, blindly, accept that each and every policy their government advances is wonderful it might promote dangerous situations in the world.

Now you have already reached the conclusion that this is the case, but, of course, this is ridiculous.

Whether or not the policies of the current Administration are correct, there is, by no means, complete agreement with them within America, and this returns us to our original premise -- the supremecy of the American form of government. As noxious as these policies may seem to you, they are subject to change by virtue of the will of the American people. Unlike so many other nations in the world they are not linked to the continued breathing of the Chief Executive.

I hope...as I said, no matter how you attempt to twist my words... that the blindly prejudiced in favour of their patch of earth vanish from the planet as we grow up as a species. Again your incredible inability to see anything except via its reference to America shows in your decision to lie by saying

"you invoke God to wipe the earth of patriotic Americans rather than hateful thugs. It tells of the intellectuall bankruptcy of the"

What utter intellectual bankruptcy! Your pathetic twisting should make you ashamed.

YOU make an utterly indefensible statement, full of arrogance and blind bigotry, then carry on about my arrogance!

You make no attempt to defend your statement, except by ongoing woolly whining...which amounts to ..."Mine is bigger than yours!" and attacks even more stupid than your original statement by lying about what I said.


Howsabout YOU defend your colossal arrogance and prove your original statement. Or make some slight attempt to do so, or back down from your idiocy instead of whining "She wants to kill me!!! Waaaah!"

You go on to compound your nonsense by making strings of insults about what you perceive my beliefs to be, and whining about how mean we are to the lovely Americans.

What pathetic nonsense to maunder on about how we want you to be humble...and so on.....just educate the astounding and disgusting arrogance and ignorance of such as you, especially when we are unlucky enough to have your sort in power, is all anyone asks.


Stop whining and sliming, Finn.

Whoa. If I could slap the face of your avatar and bring you to your senses I would. If one is looking to find the prime example of a diatribe, look no further...dlowan has delivered!

How many keys remained in place on your keyboard after you hammered out this harangue?

Put up or shut up.

By now you must surely know that I will never shut up, and that no Aussie Bunny can make me!

So what is it that you expect from me it terms of "putting up?"

It can't be that you mean I should counter and defeat your arguments (as scattershot as they may be), because I have done so, and yet you continue to advance them.

If you mean that I should deliver some sort of thesis on comparative governmental systems, don't hold your breath. I expressed an opinion. Agree with it or not. If you wish to dismiss my opinions, be my guest. This is an opinion forum, not a scholastic journal.

And if with this response I have provided you with a "gotcha," so be it too.

End of discussion.

Keltic Wizard says that Clinton was a liar on issues of nookie.

McG
Yes, the invasion of Iraq was an attempt to fight terrorism. If any terrorism was involved in that preemptive attack it was Bush's not the Iraqi's

Mcg

I see you are still among the 39% that still support the weasel and think think did the right thing.

What will it take to have people like you to wake up to reality.

IMO, the main reason is because they are demonstrating a lack of capacity to tough it out for the long haul in the face of the constant primarily negative reporting by the media reporting on the war.

gungasnake

What do you think the European leaders and for that matter the leaders and majority of people around the world think of your leader Bush? He has managed to turn the US and it's people into the most hated in the world.

While Clinton remains respected by most.

Ticomaya wrote:

IMO, the main reason is because they are demonstrating a lack of capacity to tough it out for the long haul in the face of the constant primarily negative reporting by the media reporting on the war.

How often the language used to promote this war reminds of what was said by supporters of the War in Vietnam. Here is a fine example of that echo...

If only the media would stop showing those images and reporting those stories, we could get the job done!

McG
Yes, the invasion of Iraq was an attempt to fight terrorism. If any terrorism was involved in that preemptive attack it was Bush's not the Iraqi's

D'artagnan wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

IMO, the main reason is because they are demonstrating a lack of capacity to tough it out for the long haul in the face of the constant primarily negative reporting by the media reporting on the war.

How often the language used to promote this war reminds of what was said by supporters of the War in Vietnam. Here is a fine example of that echo...

If only the media would stop showing those images and reporting those stories, we could get the job done!

Actually, the bigger problem is the lack of capacity to tough it out.