2
   

What Really Happened on 9/11?

 
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 08:42 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Amigo wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover for attacks

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 4 2006

The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.

Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country's foremost experts on National Security.

Bowman worked secretly for the US government on the Star Wars project and was the first to coin the very term in a 1977 secret memo. After Bowman realized that the program was only ever intended to be used as an aggressive and not defensive tool, as part of a plan to initiate a nuclear war with the Soviets, he left the program and campaigned against it.

In an interview with The Alex Jones Show aired nationally on the GCN Radio Network, Bowman (pictured below) stated that at the bare minimum if Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. He said it is plausible that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the attack.



Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough to stop the attack.

"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was part of the exercise," said Bowman

"I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that should be the object of investigation."

Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect behind the attacks, Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one person....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."

Bowman said that privately his military fighter pilot peers and colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story behind 9/11.

Bowman agreed that the US was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship and stated, "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what we've seen lately from this government."

Bowman slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined."



Bowman trashed the 9/11 Commission as a politically motivated cover-up with abounding conflicts of interest, charging, "The 9/11 Commission omitted anything that might be the least bit suspicious or embarrassing or in any way detract from the official conspiracy so it was a total whitewash."

"There needs to be a true investigation, not the kind of sham investigations we have had with the 9/11 omission and all the rest of that junk," said Bowman.

Asked if the perpetrators of 9/11 were preparing to stage another false-flag attack to reinvigorate their agenda Bowman agreed that, "I can see that and I hope they can't pull it off, I hope they are prevented from pulling it off but I know darn good and well they'd like to have another one."

A mainstay of the attack pieces against Charlie Sheen have been that he is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. From the very start we have put forth eminently credible individuals only for them to be ignored by the establishment media. Physics Professors, former White House advisors and CIA analysts, the father of Reaganomics, German Defense Ministers and Bush's former Secretary of the Treasury, have all gone public on 9/11 but have been uniformly ignored by the majority of the establishment press.

Will Robert Bowman also be blackballed as the mainstream continue to misrepresent the 9/11 truth movement as an occupation of the fringe minority?

Bowman is currently running for Congress in Florida's 15th District


Pea-brained, super testerone infused idiots buy this shite.
About Dr. Bob Bowman

Dr. Robert M. Bowman is President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies, Executive Vice President of Millennium III Corporation, and Presiding Archbishop of the United Catholic Church. The recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Republic Aviation Airpower Award, The Society of American Military Engineers' Gold Medal (twice), the Air Medal with five oak leaf clusters, and numerous other awards, he is one of the country's foremost authorities on national security.

Until July, 1982, he was a Vice President of Space Communications Company. Before that, Dr. Bowman was Manager, Advanced Space Programs at General Dynamics, responsible for the communications spacecraft product line. Culminating a 22-year Air Force career in 1978, Col. Bowman was Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the Air Force Space Division. In that capacity, he controlled about half a billion dollars worth of space programs, including the "Star Wars" programs, the existence of which was (at that time) secret. Dr. Bowman taught at five colleges and universities, serving as Associate Professor, Department Head, and Assistant Dean. From 1971 to 1974, Dr. Bowman was responsible for Air Force and NASA contracts in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Southern Asia. In 1969 and 1970, Col. Bowman flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is active in national and international professional societies and chaired eight major conferences. His PhD is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. Dr. Bowman has lectured at the National War College, the United Nations, Congressional Caucuses, the Academies of Science of six nations, and the House of Lords. He has appeared on McNeil-Lehrer, ABC News, the Larry King Show, Donohue, and Firing Line.http://bowman2006.com/images/ColBowmanDirectsStarWars_small.jpghttp://bowman2006.com/templates/template_images/Bob-Flag-1-edit.jpg
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 08:56 am
Strange that I cannot find any information anywhere about this Dr. Bowman or any of his 'credentials' or organizations/companies he is associated with anywhere but on his own website. Everybody else claiming such credentials pops up just about everywhere in a Google search. Also very odd that he doesn't say where he got his PhD (which is really easily checked.)

You don't suppose this guy made himself up?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 09:41 am
Amigo wrote:
Dr. Robert M. Bowman is President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies, Executive Vice President of Millennium III Corporation.....


It seems the most important thing about these corporations are their prime location on Bowman's resume. Did he create both of these organizations?


Quote:
... and Presiding Archbishop of the United Catholic Church.


Another organization founded by Bowman. Won't anybody hire this guy?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 10:41 am
And for somebody so prominent in the Reform Party, wouldn't you think they would have at least acknowledged him among the candidates in prior elections? Nary a word on the Reform Party website though.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 10:43 am
Well, Foxy, according to the "United Catholic Church" website,

Quote:
In 1990, he ran for President of the United States, and beat Pat Buchanan in Iowa, Illinois, and California before withdrawing.


So he's already been there, done that!

Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 10:45 am
old europe wrote:
Well, Foxy, according to the "United Catholic Church" website,

Quote:
In 1990, he ran for President of the United States, and beat Pat Buchanan in Iowa, Illinois, and California before withdrawing.


So he's already been there, done that!

Very Happy


Yes I know OE. He must have really ticked them off though since nobody but him seems to remember that he was a candidate. Smile
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 10:52 am
Yeah! So he decided to become Archbishop....

(And if he had to found his own church - whatever it takes!)
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 02:15 pm
Aaahhh f**k. Why?!? Why has god forsaken me.

The founder and Archbishop of his own church? Mad Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 4 Apr, 2006 02:49 pm
C-Span to Cover 9/11 Truth Talk at UW-Madison Monday!
Kevin Barrett, 12.04.2005 22:14



C-Span will challenge the official version of the 9/11 "terrorist attacks" with a nationwide delayed broadcast of a talk by David Ray Griffin at U.W.-Madison Monday 4/18/05, 7:30 p.m., in 272 Bascom Hall. The public is invited to attend, and admission is free.


Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor sparked the 9/11 Truth Movement



The nationwide news network C-span has broken the blackout on the 9/11 truth movement, raising hopes that other media outlets will follow, by deciding to broadcast a lecture by David Ray Griffin in Madison Monday night. An acclaimed philosopher-theologian and author of the 9/11 truth blockbusters The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, Dr. Griffin will be making a rare public appearance at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Monday night, April 18th. at 7:30 p.m. in 272 Bascom Hall. His brand-new talk, entitled "9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?" will focus on the ethical and spiritual dimension of facing the overwhelming evidence that the Bush Administration was complicit in the attacks of September 11th, 2001. His Madison appearance celebrates the founding of the new group MUJCA-NET: Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com.

Two related events will precede the Griffin talk: A discussion of David Griffin's 9/11 books will be held on Sunday, April 17th, 2-4 p.m.at Peregrine Forum, 616 S. Brearly St., Madison, WI (608) 442-4399; and a benefit dinner for the Griffin talk and MUJCA-NET will be held at Catacombs Coffee House, directly across from Memorial Library on the U.W.-Madison campus from 5 to 7 p.m. on Monday 4/18, right before the talk. Ten bucks buys all-you-can-eat cous-cous, falafel and baklava; David Griffin says he will be there, offering attendees the chance to shake the hand of the man political analyst Kevin Phillips says will take down the Bush Administration in flames.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Wed 5 Apr, 2006 02:34 pm
"Without the complicity of the mainstream media, the 9/11 cover-up could not exist. Those who control the mainstream media control the brainstem of our collective consciousness. When those charged with being the skeptical inquirers are neither skeptical nor do they inquire, the only phrase for it is deep complicity. When investigative journalists fail to investigate the obvious, it is deep complicity. When investigative journalists only investigate that which distracts the public from the obvious, it is even deeper complicity."
-- Barrie Zwicker


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt. ... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies -- all this is indispensably necessary."
- George Orwell, on "Doublethink" from his book of faction, "1984"
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Wed 5 Apr, 2006 02:42 pm
Bookmark
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Wed 5 Apr, 2006 03:27 pm
OUT LOUD
AN INSIDE JOB?


David Ray Griffin: Theologian scoffed at 9/11 conspiracy theories, then looked closer

©2006 San Francisco Chronicle
Thursday, March 30, 2006

When David Ray Griffin, noted theologian and professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, first heard someone say that Sept. 11 was an inside job, he scoffed.

"I can remember my exact words. ... I said, 'I don't think that even the Bush administration could perpetrate such a thing,' " said Griffin, who has since written two books, "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" and "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions,'' which dispute the official version of events. Specifically, Griffin believes that the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks.

Griffin began to delve into 9/11 conspiracy theories after looking at a time line of the events of Sept. 11, 2001 (by Paul Thompson, who later turned it into a book) on the Internet. He found himself swayed by the catalog of inconsistencies and strange coincidences.

When asked what the most compelling facts are to make the case that the U.S. government was complicit in the attacks, Griffin names three things. The behavior of Bush at the schoolhouse in Florida ("Secret Service should have whisked him out immediately if we're under attack but he stayed over 30 minutes. ... It's pretty clear evidence that they knew they wouldn't be attacked"), the strange pyrotechnics that brought down the World Trade Center ("fire has never brought down a steel high-rise building") and the poorly planned targeting of the West Wing of the Pentagon ("all the important people are in the East Wing -- it doesn't make any sense").

Not only that, Griffin points to historical evidence that the U.S. government would be capable of such a thing. Operation Northwoods, a plan concocted by the Pentagon in the '60s as a way of taking Castro from power, included ideas about how a terrorist attack on U.S. soil could provide a pretext for military action.

But why now? Griffin names the neoconservative think tank the Project for the New American Century as a motivating force. "Once you look at it, they have lots of motivation," he says. "It's what the neocons have been salivating about."

"The goals would be to get control of the world's oil and establish a new doctrine of pre-emptive warfare. That was a difficult sell before 9/11."

While many conspiracy theories have been passed around, it's been very easy to dismiss many of the theorists as, well, crazy. But Griffin comes to his controversial conclusions with lucidity and calm. He even sees a connection between his long-standing work as a theologian and his new position as a political writer.

"In both cases, the concern is for the good of the world as a whole. Those of us who believe in God believe that trashing the world is not what God wants."

sfgate
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Thu 6 Apr, 2006 02:32 pm
Quote:
http://www.iag-inc.com/Images/iag.gifhttp://www.iag-inc.com/Images/a330.jpghttp://www.dettman.info/iagportal1.jpg
Innovation Analysis Group's Providing insight on Airlines, Airports, WiFi, Travel and related issues.


Air France to fly world’s first aircraft with inflight mobile phone system

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Air France will take delivery in early 2007 of the first Airbus aircraft line fitted with the OnAir GSM equipment enabling the use of mobile phones on board, it was announced today at the Aircraft Interiors Expo in Hamburg.

Air France will receive the first aircraft, a single-aisle Airbus A318 that will have the OnAir system pre-installed, and will conduct a six month commercial trial using the new service. The passenger trials will take place on short-haul flights within Europe and to and from North African destinations, and will help Air France to consider every impact this new service may have on the cabin environment and the travel experience.

George Cooper, OnAir CEO, said: “Delivery of the first aircraft to be fitted with our system is a landmark development in this industry. It prepares the ground for many types of aircraft to be similarly equipped.

“OnAir is pleased that an Air France A318 aircraft will be the first off the Airbus assembly line with this equipment installed and that the airline has committed to a six months trial of our system. This is a further endorsement of our service.

This aircraft will be flying as part of one of the world’s largest airlines and this therefore represents a very significant step forward for OnAir.”

Rüdiger Fuchs, Airbus SVP Cabin & Cargo Customisation and member of the OnAir Board points out: "By introducing onboard mobile communication services Airbus underlines its leadership in cabin innovations. As a very important Airbus customer, we are particularly delighted to deliver the first aircraft to Air France; for the airline industry in general, we expect this to be the first of many line- and retrofit aircraft, enabling airlines to respond to growing passenger demand to communicate onboard."

The OnAir service will allow Air France travellers to use their own GSM mobile phones and GPRS-enabled devices such as the BlackBerry or Treo, to make and receive voice calls or to send and receive SMS messages or emails during the flight without harmful interference to the aircraft navigation systems.
---------
We are seeing a pattern in IFE. The killer app is not movies and other content. Its dawning on people within the airlines (at last!) that flying is tedious and an event to endure. Basically nobody really wants to be there. Anything that takes us out of that environment helps us endure the experience. The best option (by far) is to allow passengers to communicate with the outside world.

source


The so-called "proof" of the official story of 9-11 rests on cell phone calls alleged to have been made from the hijacked aircraft while in flight, calls that later experiments proved could not have actually occurred. This article confirms that cell phones require special equipment to be installed on planes in order to work while in flight.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Tue 11 Apr, 2006 04:06 pm
This was posted:
Consult one artistic medium - film.

A Beautiful Mind

Dark City

Quills

The common feature of the insane in each of these movies?

IT'S A NON SEQUITOR!
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Tue 11 Apr, 2006 05:16 pm
Zippo wrote:
The so-called "proof" of the official story of 9-11 rests on cell phone calls alleged to have been made from the hijacked aircraft while in flight, calls that later experiments proved could not have actually occurred. This article confirms that cell phones require special equipment to be installed on planes in order to work while in flight.

Laughing

From the FAQ of OnAir, the company featured in the article you pasted:

Quote:
Q28 Why have mobile phones been banned until now?

A28 Mobile phones are banned on aircraft because they can log on to, or attempt to log on to, a terrestrial network during the flight, and by doing so, start to radiate at their maximum power, exceeding levels acceptable in the aeronautical environment. This could create harmful interference to the avionics and therefore be hazardous to the safe operation of the aircraft. The OnAir mobile communications system ensures that mobile phones on board will not attempt to log on to terrestrial networks, and emulates a local GSM network inside the aircraft, thus requiring much lower transmission power from the mobile phones on board, staying within the power limits for safe operation of the aircraft.


LINK

The OnAir system is for safety and to ensure a strong signal during the entire flight, even at high altitude.

Here's another article you can read about why cell phone use is banned on planes.

You guys are a trip.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Tue 11 Apr, 2006 10:19 pm
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Sat 15 Apr, 2006 10:54 am
Quote:
A Defiant Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV
Dares Millions of Viewers to "Do [their] own research"


Prison Planet | April 15 2006

Actor Charlie Sheen made history when he first questioned the official story of 9/11, calling it the "biggest conspiracy theory of them all." Sheen's comments sent shockwaves across the alternative media and have been one of the biggest stories on the internet for weeks. The story also garnered prime time coverage by major news outlets including CNN, FOX News, and hundreds of newspapers worldwide.

Following his brave step into the spotlight over his 9/11 questions and the ensuing backlash of attacks and hit pieces, Sheen issued an email statement to the media demanding that he be challenged on the facts instead of junior high name-calling. Not one single mainstream media outlet has had the nerve to take Sheen up on his challenge.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/april2006/150406sheen2.jpg

Only a few days after Sheen's story broke in the mainstream press, sources within FOX News and CNN told Alex Jones off-the-record that there was a concerted effort from their companies' management to "kill" the Sheen story and to end any favorable coverage of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Producers were given this dictate despite the record high ratings and positive audience feedback that was received from coverage of the Sheen 9/11 story.

On Friday, April 14th on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live talk show, Sheen once again brought forward his questions about the official story to tens of millions of Americans. When asked by host Jimmy Kimmel about the statements he made on The Alex Jones radio show, Sheen succinctly remarked, "I just had questions, I had a lot of questions."

He went further, decrying the media's treatment of his statements, noting that "[the mainstream media] didn't really take a look at any of the stuff I was asking them to look at, any of the evidence or any of the stuff that generated those questions..." instead they spun it into the story of whether or not he was "qualified" to question the government.

"I felt the only real validation that I needed was being a tax paying citizen that loves my country," Sheen expressed to a powerful round of applause from the studio audience. Sheen continued, "What happed to the time in this country when we were entitled, when we had a constitutional and a God-given right to be curious about things that didn't make sense."

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/april2006/150406sheen3.jpg

When asked by Kimmel what had brought him to pose his questions about the official story, Sheen replied, "I've done a lot of research," then referred to the growing number of high-profile individuals who have already bravely stepped forward to ask questions about 9/11, stating "...its not just me, its the people that have come before me - the experts and the engineers, the physicists and the scientists and the scholars, that raised a lot of these things and I took a look at their research and said yeah, it doesn't add up, a lot of it doesn't add up, hence these questions."

Before Kimmel moved the discussion to another topic, Sheen was careful to remind the audience, "There are two areas: Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon. Don't listen to me, do your own research."

Following the broadcast of the Jimmy Kimmel Live show, Alex Jones spoke with Sheen about his views concerning the interview. Sheen made the following statement:

"This is a landmark moment in the 9/11 Truth Movement. We have fired a flaming arrow into the heart of the myopic propaganda posing as the irrefutable official story. Come one, come all, the floodgates have opened! Reveal your patriotism."

In response Alex Jones stated, "In my 12 years of broadcast, I have broken hundreds of stories that have gained national attention, but none have captured the imagination of the people like Charlie Sheen's statements on 9/11. Universally people recognize that his courageous stand has smashed the floodgates and the tide has now turned. The 9/11 Truth Movement saw its birth over four and a half years ago and it witnessed an unprecedented infusion when Charlie Sheen spoke out. "

"The bottom line is that people resonate with Charlie Sheen's courage. The average man or woman understands that Sheen is taking a risk by saying aloud what they have only thought about in secret: 9/11 was an inside job and the foundational event for the police state growing in America and the pretext for the ongoing wars for global empire.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/150406defiantsheen.htm


He's right.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif

Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.

The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.

Do you find this plausible?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Sat 15 Apr, 2006 12:40 pm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/150406sheentv.htm
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Mon 17 Apr, 2006 09:02 am
Zippo wrote:

The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.

Do you find this plausible?


Is it plausible that the sun comes up in the east or is that a conspiracy too? Could it be due to a giant invisible mirror? Is it plausible that this subject exists on this forum? I would not have believed it if I had not seen it. Some things are implausible I will admit.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Mon 17 Apr, 2006 03:15 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

There will be two histories written about 9/11. One true and one a lie. The lie will be more poplular, Because it will be supported by the most powerful political ideology known to man........Nationalism.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 02:36:53