Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

I have every right to feel insulted.

And your refusal to even try to justify what you said about me shows that you know what you said is untrue.

You make it sound like "not posting falsehoods" is an evil plot on my part.

I don't think you're evil, just lazy.

The Republican outrage over Major League Baseball moving the All-Star game out of Georgia after the passage of the state’s new voter suppression law reveals a bigger crisis in American democracy: the mechanics of our current system do not reflect the will of the majority.

Consumer-driven corporate America is increasingly throwing its weight against the new voter suppression measures across the country. While MLB and Coca-Cola are out front on the new Georgia voting law, American Airlines, Microsoft, and Dell are all opposing the new Texas voter restriction measures. These corporations are focused on those Americans with buying power, and on those they predict will have that buying power going forward. When they take a stand against voter suppression laws, they are making a bet that the future of America is moving away from the Republicans toward a more inclusive society.

They have drawn the fury of current Republican lawmakers, especially those in Georgia, who are insisting that these corporate decisions are part of a culture war in which Democrats are pressuring corporate leaders to “cancel” things with which they disagree. But MLB is not known as a progressive league. Its fanbase is primarily White and does not tend to lean left. The players were not involved in MLB’s decision to move the All-Star game out of Atlanta, a decision that will cost Georgia about $100 million. Nonetheless, former president Trump yesterday called for his supporters to boycott “Major League Baseball, Coca-Cola, Delta Airlines, JPMorgan Chase, ViacomCBS, Citigroup, Cisco, UPS and Merck,” all companies on the record against the new voter suppression bills.

The emphasis of corporate America on what its directors think the majority of its consumers want shows the same sort of disconnect national polls reveal. Americans as a whole do not like the policies of current-day Republican lawmakers. Seventy-seven percent of us like the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, and yet not a single Republican voted for it. Eighty-four percent of us like background checks for gun purchases, and yet that policy is anathema to Republicans.

Seventy-nine percent of us want the government to fix our roads, bridges, railroads, and ports. Seventy-one percent of us want the government to make sure we all have high-speed internet. Sixty-eight percent of us want the government to replace our lead pipes, the same percentage as people who want the government to support renewable energy with tax credits. Sixty-four percent of us want to pay for these things by increasing taxes on corporations and big businesses.

Republican lawmakers oppose all of these popular measures.

Because our political system is currently skewed toward the Republican Party, its members’ opposition in Congress is far more powerful than it is on the ground. Because of gerrymandering, Democratic candidates in 2020 defeated their Republican opponents by 3.1 percentage points nationally and yet lost a dozen seats in the House of Representatives.

The Senate is even less fairly representative. It is currently divided evenly, with 50 Republicans and 50 Democrats (technically, 48 Democrats and 2 Independents who caucus with the Democrats). But the 50 Democrats represent 41.5 million more people than the Republicans do (the U.S. has a population of about 328 million).

That Republican minority can currently stop all legislation other than budget bills and judicial appointments through the process known as the filibuster, which forces 60 members of the Senate to agree to a bill before it can move forward.

As current-day Republican lawmakers fall farther out of sync with what the majority of Americans want, they have turned to the courts to shore up their vision of a world in which government cannot regulate business, protect civil rights, or provide a basic social safety net, but can enforce rules popular with evangelical religious practitioners (although evangelical religion is also on the wane, apparently in part because of its political partisanship). “By legislating from the bench, Republicans dodge accountability for unpopular policies,” writes Ian Millhiser in a terrific piece in the New York Times on March 30. “Meanwhile, the real power is held by Republican judges who serve for life — and therefore do not need to worry about whether their decisions enjoy public support.”

And yet, the party is nervous enough about its eroding power base that a Republican-aligned group has launched an initiative called the “American Culture Project,” intending to redirect the “cultural narrative” that its organizers believe “the left” now controls with “cancel culture” and “woke supremacy.” Set up as a social welfare organization, the American Culture Project does not have to disclose its donors or pay federal income taxes. Through ads on Facebook and other platforms, it hopes to swing voters to the Republicans; it is organized in at least five states-- Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Virginia—under names like “Arise Ohio,” “Stand Up Florida,” and “Mighty Michigan.”

A fundraising email shared with Isaac Stanley-Becker of the Washington Post, who broke the story, says, “We are building assets to shape and frame the political field in advance of the 2022 election and beyond…. [Y]our support of our outreach can be the difference between the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate staying under control of the Democrats or shifting back to pro-freedom Republican majorities.”

Because your rhetorical style comes in for widespread criticism?

That's a bit thin-skinned. Never take offense -- you should be swelling with pride at how much attention you get here!

And when I've given you the opportunity to back up your claims you grow strangely reticent.

Not posting facts is what I'm talking about. And no, I don't think you're evil, just lazy.

You are outright lying about me when you say that I use the same tactics as RabidFox.

You are fiction. Are you a bot?

Your truth are lies

You are a very ignorant boy

You are THE monster. Like Knox.

Fact checker. You are wrong.

You do not in the slightest have the mentality to make a valid argument.

Self praise is no recommendation. You are a deluded speck of dust....

When is the last time you've asked me for a cite?

Fact: Progressives deliberately violate people's civil liberties, and they do it solely for the pleasure of violating people's civil liberties.

I hate those lame buzz words "woke" "cancel cultural."

I wonder if they are aware of just uncool they sound using them?

These responses, all directed at you, are so like yours that you might as well be arguing with yourself!

You've been asked repeatedly to validate your dubious claim to have an IQ of 170. Not only have you never supplied any proof, you won't even divulge the particular test you supposedly scored so well on.

You claimed some horse-thieving relative murdered a sheriff but you never offered any proof even when challenged.

You claimed to have heard from coldjoint but when asked to show a screenshot or verify the claim in some other way you disappeared.

That's just your opinion.

The efforts of liberals to encourage widespread mask usage, which drives conservatives up the wall, isn't done "solely for the pleasure of violating people's civil liberties," it's done for reasons of public health.

The efforts of liberals to limit magazine capacity of firearms isn't done "solely for the pleasure of violating people's civil liberties," it's to address the country's problem with mass shootings.

If you can produce proof of this silly contention, please go ahead.

I've asked you before.

Show us a clip of some grinning liberal chortling over the number of civil liberties violations he's enacted.

Show us an editorial from a liberal news source that admits that the only reason for attempting to ban assault-style weapons is for pleasure.

It's unlikely that any of the rabble here knows much about IQ tests however.

Progressives do not deserve to be called liberals. They violate core principles of liberalism.