1
   

One event changes attitude in UK-----how strange

 
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 01:18 pm
Jeepers.Here we go again.Just pull your tongue out at the screen.
0 Replies
 
rayban1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 01:44 pm
I want to make one last statement before I withdraw from this thread for good. From what your very efficient police dept has learned about the 4 bombers, it is evident that those who preach hate in your Muslim enclaves are to blame for the transition of well to do young Muslims from peaceful young people to lunatic bombers. You should be doing what WE SHOULD be doing here in this country........monitoring every prayer meeting with Arabic translators and identify those who preach hate. After they are identified, they should be removed and jailed or held in custody like the terrorists at Gitmo where they can be interrogated. 'We should then insist that Pakistan close every Madrassa school and then blow it up.

If we could identify and isolate every Imam and anyone of influence who preaches hate, perhaps the Muslim religion could be returned to the moderates. It is clear that the moderates can not take it back because of the intimidation they face from the fanatics.

If we don't get serious about eliminating the preaching of hatred, we will continue having random terrorist bombings and hollow, meaningless arguments like those I have witnessed on this thread.

You all continue with the insults.

OKbye
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 01:51 pm
He's jumped off the end of pier now.

A good thing really.He was out to create 1000 million terrorists.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 01:58 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
to get back on topic

Rayban, I dont think you understand how deeply offensive your initial statement was

"Brits have suddenly stopped bashing Bush because reality has smacked them in the face. It is very sad that it took such violence to force a change in attitude. "
.


Back on topic. Yes Steve, it was offensive;for a number of reasons:

America's insular view of the world and this administration's jingoistic crusade.
Let's hope our cousins and we get in lockstep on the terrorism issues while there's still time.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 02:01 pm
Wolf--

Your statement:

I would thank you if you didn't trivialise other people's terrorist problems as if it was nothing compared to yours and could be solved ever so easily.

Is baseless. I never trivialized anyone terrorist problems, nor did I say anything could be solved easily.

I would thank you to admit the one person-one vote rule should prevail re Ireland/NA.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 02:33 pm
It's interesting to see the U.K. go through there own 9-11.Protest,promises,ideas,etc,etc.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 02:39 pm
Walter, What do you fear will happen next with your country (political,social).We scrwed up
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 03:07 pm
I fear that we will get a conservative government - got it in our state now ... and people get more and more srewed up.

But this just in brackets on this thread - this topic is theme on the European Union and German election thread.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 03:14 pm
I live your fear
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 03:56 pm
Lash wrote:
dlowan's definition of trolling must be when people have an opinion that differs from hers. The Irish relationship with Britain was introduced long back in the thread and I have a right as much as anyone to address it. Is everyone's mention of it trolling? Just the people who disagree with dlowan?

She lies boldly when she says I didn't acknowledge a parallel relationship the US has with Native Americans. Such a bold lie because I brought my statement to the effect back and highlighted it. She merely makes up whatever suits her in her unending quest to muster a tower of self-righteousness--which must be oozing out of her ears by now.

For anyone else-- I wish the US was in a position to do for the Native Americans what the UK IS in a position to do for the Irish. I hope they will step off and allow the Irish autonomy and unified self rule.


Like I said - tantrums. Ho hum.

I believed, and continue to believe, that your manner of "addressing" it was simply aimed to provoke distress and anger and excactly what it has provoked.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 04:14 pm
Bush's "bring them on" picture album.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4173.htm
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 04:17 pm
rayban1 wrote:
I want to make one last statement before I withdraw from this thread for good. From what your very efficient police dept has learned about the 4 bombers, it is evident that those who preach hate in your Muslim enclaves are to blame for the transition of well to do young Muslims from peaceful young people to lunatic bombers. You should be doing what WE SHOULD be doing here in this country........monitoring every prayer meeting with Arabic translators and identify those who preach hate. After they are identified, they should be removed and jailed or held in custody like the terrorists at Gitmo where they can be interrogated. 'We should then insist that Pakistan close every Madrassa school and then blow it up.

If we could identify and isolate every Imam and anyone of influence who preaches hate, perhaps the Muslim religion could be returned to the moderates. It is clear that the moderates can not take it back because of the intimidation they face from the fanatics.

If we don't get serious about eliminating the preaching of hatred, we will continue having random terrorist bombings and hollow, meaningless arguments like those I have witnessed on this thread.

You all continue with the insults.

OKbye


Hmmm - I wonder whether such actions would increase the hate?

My research - such as it is - (I was listening to a program about it on radio the other day) suggests that a few madrasa schools in Pakistan are, indeed, very dangerous - however, how would you lot react if Pakistan demanded that all your bible colleges be closed? Is this likely to decrease hatred and terrorism?


As I understand it, it is a scramble to get good intelligence into the Islamic communities - whether they be in western countries or countries of origin. I assume there is a great deal of recruitment going on?

It is, indeed, very disturbing that young people of tolerant and "good" background (I understand that some of the families are quite prominent re espousing a tolerant and freer for women Islam?) should do this. It seems internationally that quite a number of fanatical Islamist youth are educated and their families quite well to do.

My understanding is that a recent study in the UK found that many of its communities lived parallel lives - hardly mixing from one ethnicity to another - and that in some cities there was a lot of hostility.

I actually think this is not uncommon with each successive wave of immigration - especially where it is quite fast - think of the immense hostility between native born and Irish in the US when the waves of the Irish diaspora hit your shores. I wonder if this is worse than other waves, and whether this separateness can be addressed at all?

I cannot help thinking of my Egyptian Islamic father client, who, when I asked about teenage rebellion in his culture (his daughter was attempting this - and I was trying to make Australian cultural sense of it for him) spoke of fanatical fundamentalism as the form it often took at present in some Islamic countries.

I also understood that the UK HAD, in fact, taken action against a few Imams who were preaching hate. Is there a real sense that there are many of them in the UK?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 04:24 pm
Wolf_ODonnell wrote:
Lash wrote:
You must be unalterably wedded to maintaining the staus quo. You seem to have a huge amount of emotion invested in the UK manipulating the Irish. Odd position for a liberal.


How horrible of you to label someone like that, just because of your perceived notions.

Just because someone is liberal on certain issues, does not mean they follow the same mind set. The world is made of different strokes, not just the two.

Quote:
This is a perfect time to make Irish autonomy a reality.

There's no fool like an old fool. Get a fresh perspective.


This statement is ignorant.

Ireland has its own autonomy. It's called the Republic of Ireland or Eire. I can't remember whether they still have the EU Presidency or not, but the Irish are autonomous.

The Irish in Northern Ireland, are another question altogether, and we cannot "free them" as you so crudely put it, because they aren't enslaved. They are every much as part of the British democratic system as Hawaii and Alaska are to the United States, and they're even further away from the American mainland than NI is to the British mainland.

The problem in part, is that a sizeable majority in Northern Ireland do not want to be a part of Ireland but want to stay within the UK. They have been living in Northern Ireland just as much as some of these Republicans, and have as much say in the matter of Northern Ireland as their counterparts.

To suddenly abandon them and tell them they have to live in Ireland now, is a stupid thing to do and say.

It's as if the native Hawaiians were suddenly to desire independence and were granted it, despite the fact that 50% of the population are not native Hawaiians and want to stay in the US.

I would thank you if you didn't trivialise other people's terrorist problems as if it was nothing compared to yours and could be solved ever so easily.


Well said. I keep wondering if she realises that Ireland IS free.

Re NORTHERN Ireland - did you read my little excerpt that the Protestants are no longer a majority in Northern Ireland?

Whether this would translate to a vote for continuing as part of the UK or not I have no idea.

My sense was that Northern ireland would gradually evolve to join the rest of the country - do you agree with this?

WOULD it still mean a bloodbath if the UK troops got out, do you know?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 04:34 pm
dlowan wrote:
Lash wrote:
dlowan's definition of trolling must be when people have an opinion that differs from hers. The Irish relationship with Britain was introduced long back in the thread and I have a right as much as anyone to address it. Is everyone's mention of it trolling? Just the people who disagree with dlowan?

She lies boldly when she says I didn't acknowledge a parallel relationship the US has with Native Americans. Such a bold lie because I brought my statement to the effect back and highlighted it. She merely makes up whatever suits her in her unending quest to muster a tower of self-righteousness--which must be oozing out of her ears by now.

For anyone else-- I wish the US was in a position to do for the Native Americans what the UK IS in a position to do for the Irish. I hope they will step off and allow the Irish autonomy and unified self rule.


Like I said - tantrums. Ho hum.

I believed, and continue to believe, that your manner of "addressing" it was simply aimed to provoke distress and anger and excactly what it has provoked.


Well. I guess that would be relevant if I gave a **** what she believes.

I have spoken to the Irish issue a few times in the last few years--we all have issues that matter personally to us-- and I will continue to do so. Dlowan is free to consider it some conspiracy, though, if it is expeditious to her narcissistic endeavors. I know she needs material to be indignant about to keep her fan base attentive to her.

Meanwhile-- Why was she unable to respond to this post?

dlowan's definition of trolling must be when people have an opinion that differs from hers. The Irish relationship with Britain was introduced long back in the thread and I have a right as much as anyone to address it. Is everyone's mention of it trolling? Just the people who disagree with dlowan?

She lies boldly when she says I didn't acknowledge a parallel relationship the US has with Native Americans. Such a bold lie because I brought my statement to the effect back and highlighted it. She merely makes up whatever suits her in her unending quest to muster a tower of self-righteousness--which must be oozing out of her ears by now.

For anyone else-- I wish the US was in a position to do for the Native Americans what the UK IS in a position to do for the Irish. I hope they will step off and allow the Irish autonomy and unified self rule.

Northern Ireland must be relinquished from the title and property of the UK before they can consider themselves free to unify. The little word games played in an attempt to deflect the topic are silly. Ireland's ambitions are currently tethered to NI.

I wonder if she realises that.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 04:58 pm
Lol - just thought you might have wanted to let 'em extract and bury the dead before you began bashing 'em, Lash.

I think the world - especially the Brits - pretty much did that when it was you guys, eh??


I think your game here distasteful.


Have a look at the manner of your "addressing". No doubt you will continue to protest that you were simply examining an issue - shrugs.


To each their own.

Now - don't hurt yerself when you throw your tantrum.

I will habve to go to work and leave you to it.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 05:37 pm
dlowan wrote:
..how would you lot react if Pakistan demanded that all your bible colleges be closed? Is this likely to decrease hatred and terrorism?


With all due respect, the graduates of Bob Jones University are not known for strapping on a bomb and terrorizing Muslim communities :wink:
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 05:48 pm
I wonder if anyone else has noticed how she ventures a few inconsequential, conciliatory lines after having her tail handed to her--and when I see fit to leave it, she slimes back and adds to it as if she's all bold--and then makes a quick exit.

She added four lines to her most recent post before Panzade posted.

Pathetic. But, dependable.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 06:03 pm
I was thinking about the inherent contradictions in liberal democracy when I was walking out to the car this morning. I stopped thinking about it when I realised I hadn't put the bloody car in the garage last night and it was 1.5c and the car was covered in frost. So while I was waiting for the windows to drop their icy covering so I could drive to work I began re-thinking the inherent contraditions in liberal democracy once more.

I heard on the radio that the British government is considering a plan to arrest, charge and deport (presumably after conviction) Imams who preach hate. All that doesn't accord with the idea of freedom of speech. This is where the inherent contradictions come in. Can a liberal democracy tolerate threats to it? Can it limit free speech in this way (I know free speech is never an absolute but I'm looking at it in a particular context) and still remain a liberal democracy in fact and practice?

As I was pondering that I heard on the radio a story about a radical Muslim group in the UK which is visiting mosques and handing out pamphlets which call for the "peaceful overthrow" (a what?) of the west's liberal democracies to be replaced with Islamic culture.

Suddenly the contradictions (at least in my mind) disappeared. Those threats are too great to ignore. There is a natural limit to tolerance and those who would call for the overthrow of the west's liberal democracies to be replaced with Islamic states need to be dealt with. In my own mind at least this is the line in the sand moment. I have a personal preference for the complete separation of religion and politics. I despise the idea of theocracy. Not for me the total submission to god that Islam demands. That is slavery.

Okay messy thinking but for mine those who advocate this should face a criminal trial and imprisonment/deportation.

Enough.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 06:10 pm
I agree.

I think there is a feeling within many Islamic communities that they MUST overthrow local governments and replace the political structure and religion with Islam. It is a tenet. This is one of the things the Islamic hierarchy must address to their adherents.

I was looking through Human Rights Watch over the past few days. There are two seperate genocides going on presently, being carried out by ...Indonesian(?) Muslims. Papua after East Timor...somewhere else close to there... Cartographically, it lookslike annexing.


Friedman or Lewis talked about "bloody borders" wiht Islamic societies.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jul, 2005 06:15 pm
goodfielder wrote:
I have a personal preference for the complete separation of religion and politics.


Your struggle with the tenets of a free society is touching.
Your conclusion is spot on.
Welcome aboard.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 10:00:55