Let's fire Trump

The Supreme Court is yet another reason to vote for Mr. Trump. He will nominate justices who will start upholding the Second Amendment.

Mr. Biden will nominate justices who will allow the Second Amendment to continue to be violated.

I'm unsure what you mean by bait and switch conversation.

I think the fact that Mr. Biden will intentionally violate the Second Amendment is just as relevant as the fact that Mr. Trump will uphold it.

The Supreme Court is the exact reason why I will not vote for Trump.

The Supreme Court IS the Supreme Court. And any thing Biden will do will either be upheld or be struck down by them.

Therefore, Trump will not earn my vote if and when there is a Supreme Court opening.

If you don't vote for Mr. Trump then you risk having a Supreme Court that will not bother to uphold your rights.

I'm not sure what you mean by earning your vote when there is an opening on the Supreme Court.

The time to vote for Mr. Trump is before there is an opening, so that he is then in position to appoint someone who will uphold your rights when the opening eventually comes.

I trust the Supreme Court will issue a judgement based on The Rule Of Law.

Unless you are hesitant they don't.

Your trust is misplaced. Democrats appoint justices who openly flout the rule of law.

The only way to get a Supreme Court that upholds the rule of law is by voting for Mr. Trump.

I disagree. Trump appointed two judges, one upheld the law and the other didn't. Your point is strangely moot.

Did you notice that the Democratic nominees were all uniformly against upholding the law?

The Trump nominee who didn't uphold the law expressed his intention to do so in future cases. He thought the current case was moot.

He was clearly naive and was outmaneuvered by the Democrats.

But that's no reason to let the Democrats gain the power to thwart the law directly without having to outmaneuver people.

Rather, it's a reason to give Mr. Trump the opportunity to appoint more justices who will uphold the law.

The more Trump appointees we have, the more the law will be upheld.

I've read that there are too many case being put in front of them, to cut down on rulings, they're waiting for the one case that covers as many issues already put up to make one clear ruling. I think they're going to rule for states to control gun laws and give them clear guidelines to cut off a lot of future challenges to state law controlling firearms.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean.

Are the democratic contenders vowing to throw out the 2nd Amendment? Are you saying the 27th Amendment will make the 2nd Amendment null and void?

And you clearly add on to your original response. It makes it difficult to follow what your intent actually is. If you cannot respond in a clear, organised and timely way, don't bother - add another post.

That would be contrary to the law. We will only get that sort of ruling if the Democrats are able to appoint justices who flout the law.

And enough with your illegal vote-down abuse already. Can't progressives ever stop cheating?

Yeah, but there's almost no limit to the restrictions that can be placed on those rights.

If the Supreme Court would uphold the Constitution, there would be considerable limits.

The Constitution only allows a fundamental right to be limited if that limitation can be justified as serving a compelling government interest.

But we need more Trump appointees on the Supreme Court before it will start upholding the Constitution.

Biden nominees = Supreme Court openly flouting the law.

Trump nominees = Supreme Court striving to uphold the law.



Yes.

Well, they mean to violate it. And they mean to appoint justices to the Supreme Court who will allow them to violate it.

They will be happy to leave it on the books as long as they are free to ignore what it says.



No.

I am not saying anything about the 27th Amendment.

Anything not Federal law belongs to the states.

The Fourteenth Amendment says otherwise.

And enough with your illegal vote-down abuse. Stop cheating.

You really do make me laugh.

You stated Trump is the ONLY one who appoints/ed Supreme Court Justices who uphold the Rule Of Law. Thanks for the inaccurate portrayal of the Presidents from 1776 to 2016 who were WRONG and by God, TRUMP stepped in to save us all!

And since when is down voting ILLEGAL? Come on! Are you thinking A2K IS the Supreme Court??

You misunderstand what I meant.

Mr. Trump is the only current candidate who will appoint justices who will uphold the law.

Past Republican presidents appointed justices who will uphold the law. Future Republican presidents will do so as well.

But for this election, Mr. Trump is the candidate who will appoint justices who will uphold the law.


Everyone has one legitimate downvote. It is against the rules for bobsal to downvote my posts a dozen times or more.

And he really misunderstands 14th Amendment, as well as the 1st and the second.

Well, YES, Trump IS the current President.

Did you think otherwise?

ALL presidents should appoint Supreme Court Justices that uphold the Rule Of Law. Isn't that what EVERY President had done and will continue to do?

Indeed they should.

It's a shame that they don't.



No.

Democratic presidents appoint justices who openly flout the law.

Joe Biden will appoint justices who will openly flout the law.