Let's fire Trump

The Republicans should really take steps to break up companies like Facebook and Twitter.

The Republicans will solidly control both houses of Congress after the 2022 election.

The day will come when the Republicans will control both the White House and Congress.

It was the Dade vote counters, however, who provoked the Republican machine. Seemingly oblivious to G.O.P. anger over the Florida Supreme Court ruling to allow manual recounts, the canvassing board tried an end run around the court's Sunday deadline by deciding to recount only some 11,000 of Dade's 654,000 ballots. Those disputed ballots, most of which did not register presidential votes in the machines, were thought to favor Gore. Worse, the board moved into a smaller room that cut off public observation.

youre gifted only with a selective memory, most of which is BS.

What was the Postmaster Gen trying to do?

whatabout disenfranchisement in several states and among folks of color.

In 2008 election the Chester Co (Pa) GOP had switched the voting place for all of Lincoln University (a historically Black University) trying to disenfranchise the voters. (They got caught)

The GOP speaker at that time made a comment that they were attempting to gerrymander the state in order to benefit the GOP. (Thats not whats in the state constitutions)

in 2018 the GOP dropped several parcels of Philly votes from the primary in a series of black neighborhoods.

Please dont lecture me on voter morality, youll lose.

You cannot point out any errors in my recollection

My heart felt question is Trump going to sign his own pardon with the hope that the courts will allow it?

A self-pardon by the president is incompatible with the provision of Article II, Section 3 that “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and the provision of Article II, Section 1 that “executive power shall be vested in a President.” (Professors Jed Shugarman and Ethan Leib have presented a different argument regarding self-pardons and the Take Care Clause, available here.)

When a president pardons another person for a federal crime, he is in fact executing the law—the law of the Constitution’s pardon power—despite the fact that he is relieving that person from the execution of the federal penal code. But when the president pardons himself, he assumes a power that is incompatible with, rather than a supplement to, the application of the federal criminal law. That is because as chief law enforcement officer, he could put himself beyond the applicable law simply by withholding his consent to his prosecution by the department he controls while he is president—and then assure himself that he could not be convicted after his term ended—or after impeachment—because he could pardon himself prospectively. Thus the law could not, in the face of such a pardon, be “faithfully” executed, because the pardon itself might be an expression of chicanery and subterfuge—in short, of bad faith. In such circumstances, the pardon is granted not to temper the criminal law or to reconcile political dissidents, as envisioned by the Framers—see, for example, Federalist 74 and remarks by Edmund Randolph at the Philadelphia Convention—but to execute an intrigue by which the law is thwarted. The self-pardon might even then amount to an element of the crime for which he is pardoned.

oralloy wrote:

You cannot point out any errors in my recollection.

Ive done it o many times its gotten that youve turned it into a form of sea lioning.