@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:YOU are the one that lumped HAMBURG ith DRESDEN to try to make your lame argument that US had nothing to do with Hamburg and Dresden.
I'm unsure what you mean by lumping Hamburg in with Dresden. It is true however that the UK destroyed both cities with a firestorm.
I do not agree with your opinion that facts are lame. I consider the truth to be quite important.
farmerman wrote:You are very predictable, dishonest and therefore predictable.
You cannot provide examples of untrue statements in any of my posts.
farmerman wrote:You rarely argue (like youve not done anything to support your ideas about Dresden
It is dishonorable of you to mischaracterize my arguments.
I know that you lack the intelligence to address my arguments, but that does not excuse mischaracterizing them.
That the Dresden firestorm was the result of UK bombers, and not the result of US bombers, is widely supported by all historical sources, including this one:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II#Night_of_13/14_February
farmerman wrote:besides to deny real facts by others).
You cannot provide examples of me ever denying any facts.
farmerman wrote:Then you merely spend 99% of your posts claiming wither "superior intelligence" or "freedom from successful oversight by others"---Both are vain pieces of BS
I spend so much time addressing those topics because you keep changing the subject to those topics.
You aren't smart enough to address the actual subject, so you just lie about me instead. I merely repeatedly defend myself from your repeated lies about me.
farmerman wrote:---Both are vain pieces of BS
Wrong again. It is true that I am vastly more intelligent than you are.
It is also true that you cannot provide any examples of errors in my posts.