Trump, be a leader, not a blamer.

You cannot provide any examples of a post where you have ever pointed out an error in my posts.

Neither can you provide any examples of me making an error even now.



Wrong again. I'm always quick to admit it when I'm wrong.



You cannot provide examples of errors in any of my posts.



The deficiency here is not in my capability to learn. The deficiency is in the fact that there is nothing to be learned from untrue claims.



It sure does frustrate some people when I post facts.

You do realize that the rail yards are in the Dresden town center. The USAAF had already bombed em 3 or 4 months earlier. SO in keeping with the allies "CITY BUSTING " missions, the US carried 1/2 of its bomb loads as incendiary.

You know you could go read this all in Wikipedia but youre too damned bullheaded . I heard it first hand from a USAAF pilot who was piloting a Lancaster not a B17. You can read about it from something a little more reputable than youve been spouting out of your mouth "from down south"


Oh ell, youre too stubborn and Im tired and fulla bbq.

stay well,

PS, very time you say something like'You cant find anything to prove me wrong" or"You cant find any mistakes Ive stated"

I substitute
"YOU WANT FRIES WITH THAT?"
Thats how you sound to me. You havent made a decent argument yet, including your "naturally aspirated autos" , you cook on a coal stove too?

Im sure they didnt TARGET them cause the art work was all probably being tunneled away in some hidey hole near Sonderauftrag Linz

The reason why US bombers didn't target art museums is because US bombers focus on attacking legitimate military targets.

Yes.



True.

So what?

US bombers still did their best to hit the Dresden railyards.

US bombers still had nothing to do with the UK's deliberate firestorm in Dresden.

US bombers still did not start any firestorm anywhere in Germany at any time.



I've seen the Wikipedia article. I already know more about the subject than you and the Wikipedia article combined.



Good for you. That doesn't justify your dishonesty, name-calling, and temper tantrums.



Your inability to point out any errors in my posts speaks for itself.



You surely didn't expect to successfully bully me into denying reality?

You must know by now that I stick to reality no matter what nonsense you spout.



I'll do my best.



When you refuse to address my arguments and instead falsely accuse me of making imaginary errors, you always remind me of a drunken weirdo screaming about the end of the world on a street corner.



Your inability to point out any errors in my arguments says otherwise.



If you prefer effeminate cars, that's your business.

I really believe that you are benefitting from an ad hoc education on Dresden. Since youve gotten so much wrong already, and then try to cover up with these weak ass affirmations with a "SO" doesn t help your assrtion about you vast torheouse of dresden knowledge. I think you are just bundling this with hamburg and trying to exculpate US from any association. You really havent read much history have you?

You can assrt whatever you wish, we judge your overall knowledge of a subject by what you say, and you seem to lack the wisdom to be able to tell whats really what.

We? Are you at headquarters with Blatham? "We" means 0.

we didnt read the new book about personal pronouns did we??

I speak and write English. For various rasons my spelling is ofetn messed up and I dont take time with spellchek but I think the readers are mostly smart enough to decrypt
What's your world's language pinky?

You have a big mouth, but it's all empty talk. Let's see you back up your empty talking by pointing out something that I am actually wrong about.



Saying "So what?" is not an attempt to cover anything up. It is asking you what your point is. Were you just reciting some trivia?

Facts are never weak. You can't do anything to challenge reality.

My assertion of knowledge does not require help.



I am unsure what your confusion is regarding Hamburg, but the US had nothing to do with the firestorm there either.

US bombers had nothing to do with any firestorm in Germany.

The only significant firestorm that was caused by the US was Hiroshima. And given the A-bomb, that firestorm was a bit superfluous.



I've read more history books than you've read books of any sort.



Your inability to point out any errors in my assertions speaks for itself.

So EFI and turbos and intrcoolrs are what gay? Well Im comin out then.
Youd love Cuba then. They have cars down there with more carb pipes than a Flentrop church organ and solid steel dashboards so your brains can ooze all over the floor when you hit with unbelted force. Course mosta them things with cast magnetite blox, get 2 MPG and can barely get outta their own way?

Porsche made a couple models recently naturally aspirated , couple a real dogs. Good for uber rides and not much else.

How big were the naturally aspirated engines in those Porsches? Were they pushrod V8s?

Try a Camaro or a Challenger. They can be had with proper pushrod V8s.

coldjoint, with all due respect, I'd argue that it would be foolish to call Trump a successful businessman since he simply subsists on his friends' dosh, say, Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, who has bailed the billionaire out twice. Writing in one issue of Bloomberg Businessweek, a journalist describes how some well-to-do Asian businessmen came to rescue when Trump was facing financial hardship: weighed down by bad debt, Trump had no choice but to sell some parts of his company, lest his company went under again. In effect, "no major U.S. company has filed for Chapter 11 more than Trump's casino empire in the last 30 years," according to the business section of CNN.
https://money.cnn.com/2015/08/31/news/companies/donald-trump-bankruptcy/index.html.

His failure to shake up his casino businesses has been reported by Fox News as well.

https://www.foxnews.com/story/trump-casinos-to-file-for-bankruptcy-in-restructuring-move

Fortune's Shawn Tully also wrote another article arguing that some contractors had been fleeced or stiffed by Trump.

https://fortune.com/2016/10/08/donald-trump-taxes-contractors/amp/

The WSJ has been one of the fervent supporters of Trump, along with Fox News , Breitbart , or 4chan, which is a place where incels and meme-making trolls vent their spleen on both liberals and feminists with gusto as part of the alt-right movement. Some bellicose supremacists also use it to incite hatred against non-whites with fascist overtones, just like some Muslim nutters who inveigh against the American-led global order while preaching the virtues of Islam thinking.

I take exception to your view that Max Boot hates Trump. Max Boot is just another feisty and outspoken journalist preoccupied with the idea of seeking truth and rectifying injustices or official wrongs through his articles, just like his predecessors Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.
Lots of scandals related to grandees and socialites have been unearthed, thanks to their strenuous efforts to dig the dirt on them. If hadn't been for them, some leaders wouldn't have given voice to the needy. If hadn't been for gusty journalists like Ronan Farrow of The New Yorker and his colleagues, more women would have been sexually harassed by high-wattage people like Harvey Weinstein without having a chance to sue them.

Regardless, I think we should respect journalists like Max Boot instead of looking askance at their attempts to limit the powers of the president and help little guys seek redress from the government once the government tries to encroach on their civil liberties and financial interests.

Trump would do well to realize that press freedom is part of democracy.

YOU are the one that lumped HAMBURG ith DRESDEN to try to make your lame argument that US had nothing to do with Hamburg and Dresden. Its a shallow mindless argument tool.

You arevery predictable, dishonest and therefore predictable. You rarely argue (like youve not done anything to support your ideas about Dresden besides to deny real facts by others). Then you merely spend 99% of your posts claiming wither "superior intelligence" or "freedom from successful oversight by others"---Both are vain pieces of BS

Your opinions are not facts, although we all know you like to pretend they are. You are profoundly ignorant, and have displayed your ignorance constantly. Your grandiose claims about your alleged intelligence and the scope of your alleged knowledge are what make you pathetic. I constantly show your errors, and your substitution of your opinions which you label facts.

if 45 was even half the leader Obama was, he'd wear a mask at his next press conference...

Trump has no leadership skills on top of his pathological narcissism.

What is half of nothing?

answer: a pinky post

Wrong again. Nothing is half of nothing. No problem, we know Democrats cannot do simple math.

You did not answer my question, are you, or were you, at headquarters with Blatham?