Trump, be a leader, not a blamer.

It is doubtful anyone would have surrendered to the threat of nuclear destruction without it having been done in practice somewhere. If they would have just sent out films of the testing of the weapons, people might have thought it was just some made-up propaganda or they would dismiss the possibility that it would actually end up being used against their people.

the self-denying Trump reportedly said on Saturday that Joe Biden "doesn't write." ROFL. It's a little infra dig for a president to make a false claim and use it to take a dig at another presidential candidate like this. More to the point, Trump is not even in a good position to hurl epithets at Joe Biden for not being a learned sort, since it's widely reported that Trump doesn't even read; he only tweets, watches Fox News, and leers at his models.

livinglava wrote:

It is doubtful anyone would have surrendered to the threat of nuclear destruction without it having been done in practice somewhere. If they would have just sent out films of the testing of the weapons, people might have thought it was just some made-up propaganda or they would dismiss the possibility that it would actually end up being used against their people.

Who knows. The important point is that Japan did not make any surrender offers until after both A-bombs had already been dropped.

Claims that the US nuked Japan after they surrendered are just as untrue as claims that the US had anything to do with the firestorms at Dresden and Hamburg.

The great thing about Mr. Trump is, he protects our civil liberties

My point is not about attacking or defending any identities, but rather it's about critically reflecting on whether any government/military would realistically surrender to an enemy in the thick of war based on an experimental weapon threat without the weapon actually having been deployed.

why should anyone on this planet care about anything you say

when you keep carrying on like some petulant child

after youve been shown to be wrong about Dresden..

He does this by decreasing the surplus population?

He couldnt care about civil rights unless there was some way he could get a mention on FOX about it. He has no principles upon which he is unconditionally attached.

Hes Amoral. Thats the scary part about this slug

To say that US had no part in it was about as ignorant as you can be.

Ive asked you a simple question, I wssnt responding to anything but your ignorance.

SO your only defense is to try to name call ??

Youre in fine lying fettle (as usual).

You cannot provide any examples of untrue statements in any of my posts.

Your just a weak little lyin douche bag,

whose clock got cleaned by set and others

and others and doesnt know how to back off like an adult.

Ok "Fredo"

Your just a weak little lyin douche bag,

whose clock got cleaned by set and others

like an adult.

US bombers did not cause any firestorm in Dresden or anywhere else in Germany

I see that youve gradually changed your wording from ,"It was an all UK mission" to "US didnt cause any firestorm"

I wonder what the several hundred tons of incendiary ordnance was used on.

Now Ill read and see how you add a few lines of attempted salubrious bullshit to gradually try to slide away from your original point

of which you had no idea about what you were talking.

As far as your intelligence, Ill give you this, your almost as smart as TRUMP.

OH its pinky. Absolutely nothing worth reading from him. Hes almost as repetitive as Ollie.

Ollie doesnt know how to say hes wrong about Dresden.

Why dont you show him that youre a man and can take being wrong gracefully. K?

I just joined in well after this was nicely decided by set taking you outside .

Gradually changing your story I see.

Now we only bombed the railyards. (And the two art museums maybe, wanna list?)