Four ways Trump is trying to be king.

Still watching the commies on fox?

(UPDATED with CBS statement) Fox News has come out in support of CNN in CNN’s lawsuit against the White House’s decision to pull the press credentials of Jim Acosta, joining a dozen other media outlets announcing intent to file friend-of-the-court briefs to support CNN and its White House correspondent.

“Fox News supports CNN in its legal effort to regain its White House reporter’s press credential,” Fox News President Jay Wallace said in a statement.

Not long afterwards, CBS also chimed in with support for the Jeff Zucker run cable newser. “CBS News supports the White House Correspondents Association and CNN’s legal effort to restore access for its White House correspondent,” said the crew at Black Rock. “We do not believe that revoking White House press credentials is an appropriate remedy for a disagreement the White House may have with a particular reporter. We intend to file a friend of the court brief in support of CNN’s lawsuit to defend its constitutional rights.”

On Tuesday, CNN sued the White House for pulling Jim Acosta’s press credentials the day after President Donald Trump’s thumping in the midterm elections.

The cable news network filed a lawsuit in DC District Court against Trump and top aides, including White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and Deputy Chief of Staff/ Former Fox News co-president Bill Shine, as well as the Secret Service which took away Acosta’s hard pass that afternoon.

CNN demanded the return of its chief White House correspondent’s press pass. Read it here.

“Our news organizations support the fundamental constitutional right to question the President, or any President. We will be filing friend-of-the-court briefs to support CNN’s and Jim Acosta’s lawsuit based on these principles,” 13 media outlets said in a joint statement this morning, including Fox News as well as AP, NBC, Gannett, New York Times, USA Today, Politico, Bloomberg, Washington Post and others.

“Our news organizations support the fundamental constitutional right to question the President, or any President. We will be filing friend-of-the-court briefs to support CNN’s and Jim Acosta’s lawsuit based on these principles,” the 13 news outlets said in their statement.

“We intend to file an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court,” added Fox News’s Wallace in his separate statement. Notable, given that many Fox News Channel commentators have blasted Acosta’s aggressive Trump question-asking, including some who say Acosta’s credentials should be revoked.

“Secret Service passes for working White House journalists should never be weaponized,” Wallace said. “While we don’t condone the growing antagonistic tone by both the President and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people.”

Wallace’s remarks are in marked contrast to those of GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, who called CNN’s First Amendment lawsuit a “political stunt.”

McDaniels insisted, in a tweet, that Acosta continues to get White House access through daily passes, CNN reported, though that statement seems to have been removed from her tweeting.

Maybe after CNN pointed out it was inaccurate.

As CNN said in court documents filed Tuesday, the White House denied Acosta’s application for a day pass on November 8, the day after his hard pass was revoked following the post-midterms news conference.

And during Trump’s weekend trip to Paris, the White House and the Secret Service continued to deny Acosta access to press events. That included a ceremony for which Acosta had acquired separate credentials from the French government, according to CNN’s lawsuit.

In a signed declaration, CNN Washington Bureau Chief Sam Feist wrote that “reliance on daily passes” to access other unscheduled events on the White House grounds like “gaggles” and off-camera briefings was “impracticable at best, impossible at worst.”

To Restore Jim Acosta’s White House Credentials.

Why what difference would it make? Trump could **** on the American flag while giving Putin America's launch codes and you'd still slavishly worship him.

As long as children are still being butchered in schools, racist police are killing minorities and refugees a dying in internment camps you're happy.

Translation, I'm absolutely right, there's nothing Trump can do that will ever stop your doe eyed devotion. He could launch the planet into the Sun and you'll still be praising him.

farmerman wrote:

Im just ammazed at how the Trump supporters "buy into" everything this guy says and either deny or just avoid his penchant for eaxaggrating and plain lying. Itt reminds me of some other people in history who bought into a master of "Big Lies"

Scary since now our "glorious
leader" has made a personal attack on only one group of the media .

Well, I've asked you twice now and you didn't answer. You claimed that president Trump is a fascist. When I asked for an example of his fascism, you claimed that he has interfered with freedom of the press. For the third time, back up that assertion. Name one human being in the world who was unable to speak, or write, or broadcast something because of the president.

Brandon9000 wrote:

farmerman wrote:

Im just ammazed at how the Trump supporters "buy into" everything this guy says and either deny or just avoid his penchant for eaxaggrating and plain lying. Itt reminds me of some other people in history who bought into a master of "Big Lies"


Scary since now our "glorious
leader" has made a personal attack on only one group of the media .

Well, I've asked you twice now and you didn't answer. You claimed that president Trump is a fascist. When I asked for an example of his fascism, you claimed that he has interfered with freedom of the press. For the third time, back up that assertion. Name one human being in the world who was unable to speak, or write, or broadcast something because of the president.

Ivana Trump and Marla Maples (that's two people)

Brandon9000 wrote:

farmerman wrote:

Im just ammazed at how the Trump supporters "buy into" everything this guy says and either deny or just avoid his penchant for eaxaggrating and plain lying. Itt reminds me of some other people in history who bought into a master of "Big Lies"

Scary since now our "glorious
leader" has made a personal attack on only one group of the media .

Well, I've asked you twice now and you didn't answer. You claimed that president Trump is a fascist. When I asked for an example of his fascism, you claimed that he has interfered with freedom of the press. For the third time, back up that assertion. Name one human being in the world who was unable to speak, or write, or broadcast something because of the president.

Ivana Trump and Marla Maples (that's two people)

You will only accept an answer if it's within your own narrow parameters, and you then think you can put words in other's mouths.

You're being dishonest and ostrich like. I've already given you the name of someone who will never talk because of Trump, but that wasn't good enough.

Trump is on record as trying to shut up Stormy Daniels. The fact that he failed doesn't exonerate him, or make him a good person. That's why attempted murder is an offence.

I already posted this example of Trump interfering with the freedom of the press on this thread.

Suggest you read my previous post on this thread.

The heading of my previous post reads:
Fox News & CBS Join News Outlets Supporting CNN In Lawsuit
To Restore Jim Acosta’s White House Credentials.

The date of my previous post on this thread is June 24.

All you have to do is scroll seven post back to read my previous post.

The reason you didn't accept my answer is because you have narrowed your parameters so as to exclude any answer.

Trump is a fascist who has tried to shut people up by creating a climate of fear. Those too scared to speak out are not suddenly start giving out their names and addresses. That's what being too scared means.