1
   

Dennis Miller Canceled Rplaced with Biz Show Rerun

 
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 07:30 pm
tommrr wrote:

C) The team is still satisfied with your play, but feel you are not worth the terms you are asking for or just can't afford them.

I would say C is essentially the same as my choice A-the team likes you, but figures they will be outbid for you by another team, so why bother submitting a contract?

tommrr wrote:
D) The team has decided on a new direction, and while still very capable, not a fit in the new plans.

Okay, that happens, you played okay but the team stinks as a whole and they are starting over with a new quarterback, new running back, new linebackers, etc. Again it's pretty much a variation of A: you're a good player, but you are more valuable to someone else than us. I mean, if the veteran player is willing to sit on the bench and take the minimum or near it, presumably the team will keep him. But they know someone else will want him and pay him more.


tommrr wrote:
Anyway, following with what you are saying, that essentially when someone is cut, or released, then they are fired. Would you agree then, that the 49ers fired Jerry Rice, or mutally parted ways because of one of the above ideas.


Once you get past the tear-filled tributes, Jerry Rice was essentially cut from the team. Of course, they can't put it like that, but that is what it amounts to.

I suppose there are some industries where the contract is extended to an employee, and at the end of the contract the employee understands that the company will assess it's needs and let him know if they are interested in his services. With sports and TV, however, the expectation is that if you are doing well, they extend a new contract. If you feel it differs from firing in significant ways-and at this income rate unemployment insurance is really not a consideration, lol-then well and good.

My objection to Timber's theory is that he was trying to make the fact that Miller left early into some kind of idea that Miller was actively trying to escape CNBC, when in fact he really wasn't. Miller wanted them. They didn't want Miller. The details of the leaving, from the audience perspective, are fairly immaterial, I think.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 07:44 pm
Ok...so we are just arguing semantics at this point. But it was nice to have a few posts back and forth without any insults and name calling.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 08:07 pm
Quote:
He wasn't fired either...still under contract

Watch as I graciously say, I stand corrected. I thought Chapelle was dooing some toot and they put the show on "hiatus" cuz he was getting all paranoid and having self esteem issues.
GIMME THE 50 mil, Hell, Ill stink up the place and cry all the way to the bank
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 08:13 pm
HEY!! They sprinkled crack on Dave!!!
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 08:46 pm
farmerman wrote:
Quote:
He wasn't fired either...still under contract

Watch as I graciously say, I stand corrected. I thought Chapelle was dooing some toot and they put the show on "hiatus" cuz he was getting all paranoid and having self esteem issues.
GIMME THE 50 mil, Hell, Ill stink up the place and cry all the way to the bank

Yes, that was gracious. Nice change of pace for the posts around here. Hell, I could save CC some money, I'd do the same thing as Dave for 25mil.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 08:49 pm
20
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 08:53 pm
19, but I get 2 weeks off every 6 weeks and they have to pay for the rehab
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 09:03 pm
We need to get back to insults and name calling.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 09:17 pm
Yeah, I think you may be right. While it is civil, it is REALLY BORING without it.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 May, 2005 09:18 pm
Hell, it was worth a shot
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 08:48 am
ok , you can have Chappelles show for 19 , I aint gonna work for no chump change
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 09:02 am
They do need someone for the Chappelle spot.

http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,16535,00.html





farmerman'd be great.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 09:39 am
yeh but its 120 mil or nothin. Id change the format, wed have "standup" geology


WHADDYA DO WITH ASEVERELY PTYGMATIC FRACTURE PLANE?

YA LOOK FOR THE LINEAMENT>

ha ha ha , oh ha ha , I tear me up.
0 Replies
 
tommrr
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 May, 2005 12:42 pm
But are you ready for the stess that a contract that size will cause???
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1061415,00.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 08:21:35