Steve (as 41oo) wrote:You are a very peculiar man Brahmin. I am trying to get Raul to follow the logic of his argument and admit it means supporting jihad against troops in Afghanistan. Yet your hatred of muslims is only surpassed by your hatred of Brits. Therefore you say it doesnt matter if jihadists kill british troops. However islamic terror against hindus sends you into fits of apoplectic rage. Your position is just as illogical as muslim Raul.
nope i was trying to point out YOUR hypocracy.
all the complainS you have against raul and muslims is for the london bomings and for the killing of a few pom soldiers in afghanistan - a country they (poms) have no business going to in the first place.
my example served to prove that lot more innocent people die in the hands of islamic jehadis everyday, in israel, in india (varanasi, delhi, bangalore, parliament attacks, akshardham temples, kashmir), in almost all countries that have a sizable muslim population.. and yet that dont seem to make islam at all bad. they are bad only when poms are killed or madrid is bombed or 9/11 happens. else, by your posts, all else is cool.
islamic terror against ANYONE sends me into a rage (you can read my pasta posts - i never singled out their attrocities in india, but pointed out that they were cutthroats where ever they went). but when a country is invaded and the ATTACKERS are killed - its not islamic terror, its the terror the attacker has unleashed on the country. 9/11 was the other way round, and so i have NO love for the perpetrators of that incident. but the afghans do have a right to throw out the poms. its their country.
however, you are right about my hatred for muslims being surpassed only by my hatred for dampoms. or was that a tie?? one kills all they can physically, another killed all countries they could economically (and indirectly physically as well, like by engineering artificial famines).