mesquite wrote:Muslim1, are you saying that there is a problem with Ibn Ishaq's "Sirat Rasulallah"?
Mohammad Ibn Ishaq Al-Matlabi (May Allah have mercy upon him) is certainly an eminent Muslim who had done the first great effort to gather the
Sira (life) of the Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in the book you mentioned (
Sirato Rasulillah).
However, many Hadith (sayings, narrations of the Prophet) scholars noticed that
Ibn Ishaq gathered both
Sahih (strong, true, correct) narrations as well as
Daiif (weak) ones. Moreover, the books of
Ibn Ishaq came to late Muslims through some quotes which were found in the writings of other scholars like "
Tahthib Assira" by
AbdulMalik Ibn Hisham.
The methodology of
Ibn Ishaq is based on narrations with the
Isnad (chain of narrators) that he had. Certainly, some chains are
Maousoul (Continuous) to the Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), but others are
mounkati' (discontinuous, cut). Even
Ibn Ishaq himself, wrote after some narrations that "Allah knows best the authenticity of them (the narrations, the sayings)".
The methodology of
Ibn Ishaq is a very respectable one, but the Hadith scientists criticize it for being less rigorous than other
Sira writers.
I think the best early accurate
Sira available is "
Sirat Ibn Hisham" written by
Ibn Hisham (May Allah have mercy upon him). There is also the
Sira written by
Imam Attabari (May Allah have mercy upon him).
And Allah knows best.