muslim1 wrote:agrote ;
You wrote (in page 3 of this thread):
Quote:Of course Evolution is a theory.
and (in page 4 of the same thread):
Quote:it answers the argument that evolution is just a theory
Aren't these two statements contradicting? Please specify whether evolution is a fact or theory.
Evolution is a theory. A theory that is well-respected and accepted by the scientific community, as is the theory of gravity, for example. The two statements aren't contradictory - in the second one I just meant that the link I posted explains that saying "evolution is just a theory" is of course true, but is a useless criticism of the theory's truth. Yes evolution is a theory, so what? Look again at the link, and it explains what 'theory' actually means. Remember that gravity is a theory, do oyu believe in gravity?
Thanks, I'll look at those soon and get back to you.
Quote:Let me ask you a question: you are a human being, having a number of qualities that other living creatures do not have; you have an intelligence, you can speak... You, as a human, are favored over all other species: now do you imagine that your ancestor was and Ape? an Ape has no intelligence, is not beautiful, cannot express itself in a clear language (like English)... Think about it without pre-established ideas.
First of all, apes
are beautiful. I'm surprised you would accuse what you believe to be "a creation of God" of being ugly. I accept of course that apes are less intelligent than us, and I believe that all that means is that we are further up the evolutionary ladder.
I'm going to try and convince you that evolution does make sense, because you seem to think it's not possible that we could be related to apes.
You accept that different apes have different physical characteristics, rigt? Some apes are tall, some apes have better eyesight, some apes are smarter because their brains are slightly more developed, or whatever. Okay? So apes, like every other species, are not all identical. Here is something else you should agree with: these physical differences between apes make some apes fitter for survival than others. An ape with better eyesight might find it easier to find food, a smart ape might be better at avoiding danger, and an ape with strong arms might be better able to defend himself. So generally the apes that survive are the fittest apes. Agreed?
I can't think of any reason why you wouldn't agree with everything I've just said. But now I come to the bits you might not agree with. Dead apes can't reproduce, so the apes that do reproduce are those that survive - the fittest apes. When apes reproduce, they pass some of their characteristics on to the baby. Now, the thing that I'm not sure whether you agree with, is that this is due to genetic inheritance. The physical characteristics that make apes fitter for survival are determiend by their genes, which they pass on to their offspring, producing fit babies.
But where do the 'fit' genes coem from in the first place? This'll be hard for you to accept, but the theory is that genetic mutations occur randomly, producing new genes, and therefore new physical characteristics. So as well as inheriting their parents' characteristics, apes are randomly born with smaller noses, or less hair, strong legs, bigger brain, or whatever. Now if these mutations are not very good, they might cause the ape to die before reproducing. But the good random characteristics, which are best suited to the apes' environment, will survive, since the ape will be fitter for survival and will live to reproduce. So they can pass these new genes on to their offspring, and produce a line of apes with, for example, slightly less hair. This process continues to happen, and the apes gradually evolve according to their environment. If the climate changes, for example, and it gets colder, they might develop thicker fur.
Evolution isn't some mystical process, it's just the process of having babies that are slightly different to you. So let me recap:
Random genetic mutations occur, and cause animals to have particular new characteristics, such as bigger ears, or smaller stomachs.
The animals with the best genes will survive and reproduce, since good genes make them fitter for survival.
When animals reproduce, they pass their genes on to their offspring. This means that the most beneficial random mutations survive accross generations, so that, for example, apes in the future have slightly less hair.
As this gradual process continues to happen over many many years, species can evolve into completely different animals, just as apes have evolved into humans.
That is the process of evolution. Which of thoase premises do you not accept?
Quote:It is a fact of history that prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was an illiterate. This fact is sufficient to prove that prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) is not the author of the Holy Qur'an, but that it is a revelation from almighty God.
Almighty God said: "And thou wast not (able) to recite a Book before this (Book came), nor art thou (able) to transcribe it with thy right hand: In that case, indeed, would the talkers of vanities have doubted."
[Holy Qur'an 29:48]
Is there any evidence other than the Qur'an for this "fact"?
Quote:Can you tell me, my friend, who created the extraordinary beautiful and organized universe? who created humans? who is the sustainer of the world?
Nobody. As I said, I don't believe in God, so those questions are meaningless to me. I prefer the question, Did anyone create the extraordinary beautiful and organised universe? No.
Quote:The grace and favor of almighty God (Allah in Arabic) over humans is extraordinary. Do you think it is fair not to obey the Lord of the worlds who gave us all this?
It is probably not fair to disobey the Lord of the worlds. But since there isn't one, I'm in the clear.