@RexRed,
Quote:
It was a joke and I am not a creationist I am an agnostic... Unlike those who think they know it all...
It’s very interesting that you claim to be an agnostic…and yet , your position seems to focus more on agreeing with creationism instead of wondering about, asking questions...
Going back one page, on this thread, I came across this post of yours… whomever reads this, will notice that you and creationism are related:
Quote: Considering Darwinism is taught in every major school and also considering that 90% of most Americans believe in God, who is imposing what on others?
Nobody is imposing anything on anybody. Creationism long ago was taken to court and was proven that it was a scam…so was Intelligent design, which is “creationism” disguised as something else that sounds a little bit more scientific…creationism is religion posing as science…and you know what the constitution says about religious materials being taught in public schools…right?
Quote: All religionists want is to have a fair voice in the matter concerning what is taught to their own children.
And all "religionists" have their rights to teach their children all the fairly tales they want…as long as they keep those teachings away from public schools…
Quote: I see no reason why creationism cannot be taught as a differing historical view considering even scientists don't know what happens one split second before the big bang.
I see a very good reason why creationism should be kept away from public schools: “Goddidit” explains “everything” by explaining nothing! And science doesn’t know what happened one split second before the big bang…why do you think creationism knows this better than the scientists?
Quote: I do not endorse doing away with Darwinism but I do support allowing young minds to consider divine intervention as regarding this life and creationism.
Divine intervention? Are you talking about the supernatural…something that it can’t be measured nor tested by science?
Quote: Paganism, Judaism, Islam, Christianity, Hinduism and ever Buddhism to some extent all believe in an all powerful being, force, mother and/or father or light who set the universe into place.
Those religions made assumptions on how the universe and the world was created…based on ignorant, biased observations which attributed them to [an] all powerful, invisible being[s]…why did they make those assumptions? Simple…back then there was no science! Otherwise…it would’ve been another story.
Quote: And what happens to atheists and agnostics when they die?
I don’t know…and neither do you…
Quote: Do they go to hell or live for a billion years?
Don’t know either…but the idea sounds preposterous.
Quote: The same exact argument can be put back on you?
No…it’s not the same argument…instead, that argument is an argument from ignorance.
Quote: Science has no idea of an afterlife whatsoever...
Science doesn’t have any idea about the afterlife because science doesn’t dwell in mythology, or intuitive assumptions…like religion.
Quote: If you say people simply rot in the ground you are espousing yet another "religion" because no one truly knows of the soul and spirit of a being...
Rotting in the ground has been observed…from there on, nothing can be asserted…science can’t say that something “is” without testing it..science is humble about it..that's why when there is a mistake made by science, science corrects it…. thought you knew this…but you’re an agnostic…right?
Quote:
What makes your own conjecture of the afterlife any more valid or divinely inspired than the supposition presented in the Bible?
For hundreds of years, there have been tons of scientific investigations concerning the supernatural…those scientific investigations were able to explain natural phenomena that were mistaken for supernatural ones…
By the way, James “The Amazing” Randi- a former Las Vegas magician- is giving away one million dollars for anybody who proves to him that the supernatural really exists…do you wanna become one million dollars richer?
You have proven to me that anything is possible...even the existence of Agnosticism/ creationism position.