Frank Apisa wrote:But we have already shown that the supposed "sin" of Adam was nonsense.
You have not shown anything, Frank. You have claimed.
Frank Apisa wrote:Your god refused to let Adam know what was right and wrong...what was good and evil....
Really, Frank, You have a conscience, right? We all have, except sociopaths, I guess. Does your conscience sometimes tell you something would be wrong before you do it? It works that way for many people. And, does your conscience bother you if you do something wrong? It does for many people.
So, if you had a perfect conscience, you would not have to be told it was wrong to steal or cause harm to someone, you would automatically know, right?
Now, I don't know about you Frank, but if my best friend had just offered to let me stay in his home rent free so long as I didn't eat from one of his fruit trees, I would opine the tree must be important to him and would stay clear of it. Adam and Eve were given perfect consciences (If you believe the bible, that is.) They were given only one command, one rule they would be
capable of breaking. Not 10 commandments; Not the many pages of Mosaic law; just one command.
And you are telling me it is certain the test was unfair? That's a real stretch, Frank.
Frank Apisa wrote:...and then punished him for doing something that he (Adam) had no way of knowing was wrong.
Oh, there you go; you did stretch. Adam and Eve were smarter than you or me Frank. They were even smarter than Setanta. You haven't proved anything; you made an assumption unsupported by evidence and used it to justify your conclusion.
Frank Apisa wrote: The allegory is absurd...laughably absurd.
Argumentum ad lapidem, Frank.
Frank Apisa wrote:That an adult would buy into it is pitiful.
Argumentum ad hominem! Good job.
Keep up the good work!