reply
watchmakers guidedog wrote:coluber2001 wrote:In my opinion myths and symbols were never meant, originally, to be taken literally, but, if they are, that's fine too.
However since the concept of biblical metaphorics is only a century or two old, pretending that the original meaning was not as a literal document is intellectually dishonest.
For such ideas to be openly discussed may be fairly recent, but the bible itself speaks of itself as a metaphor, Ps 78:2, the entire history of Israel, and Ps 49:4, and Gal 4, showing how Ishmael v. Isaac is a metaphor, and Prov 1:4,6 about how the "simple" must become "subtle", and Jesus also, "without a parable spake he not unto them", Matt 13:34.
But besides, it is just PATENTLY OBVIOUS that there is "metaphor" involved, I mean COME ON, that story in Judges where this Levite offers his concubine to the neighborhood rowdies who screw her to death and then he chops up her body and sends the pieces to the tribes of Israel demanding vengeance and the tribe of Benjamin won't play ball and can't have any wives from the other tribes and so they have to SNATCH DANCING GIRLS IN THE VINEYARDS FROM SHILOH for their wives, "shiloh" is a name for Christ, it means peace. Judges 19,20, 21.
*watches you guys swoosh go get a bible, lol*
But religion is for a group...and the group has varying levels of concious insight...and they aim for the lowest...as it should be I guess...anyone with more on the ball can figure out a better answer for themselves.
I'm not mad anymore...but I was...
And I was half in love with you watchdog, from the philosophy forum...
The internet is SO GONNA GET ME FIRED...
not my fault at all<--my philosophy...