1
   

Impeach Kennedy for Being Supremacist Judge?Or Just Kill Him

 
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 08:34 am
I am amazed at the naivety of some who say all the judges have to do is follow the letter of the law as written in the constitution. The constitution not written in concrete but is an alive and vibrant document and is a guideline not a how to document. You cannot go to it and find a rule or law for every occasion. If one could we would not need judges to make rulings. The supreme court would be superfluous. Do courts and judges make laws, sure. By virtue of their rulings and interpretation of the constitution.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 08:52 am
I agree. The Constitution is also not explicit in many areas. Take DrewDad's point about the capital punishment decision. The Constitution forbids cruel and unusual punishment but does not enumerate punishments which would fit that criteria. And I'm glad, because if tarring and feathering was the only cruel and unusual punishment explicitly named, that would mean that all other punishments would be considered humane. You can see where I'm going with this. The Constitution is a guideline we should not violate, but it does not dictate every single law we live by.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 09:02 am
What does one say to such stuff? More to the point here, what does one say to those among us who hold to a post-enlightenment, rationalist view of knowledge and hold to a liberal set of notions re governance and the carrying on of community human affairs that this IS as dangerous as it looks? Is it possible that the incredible has become credible?

Deb earlier tossed in the concept of "conspiracy theories". It is a concept which has enough baggage that it can prevent observation easily as much as facilitate it.

Why ought we to assume that our particular age is somehow insulated from tendencies and dynamics which litter the history of human affairs? Why ought we to happily suppose that America is, by nature of its political system and its cultural heritage, to be a providence-blessed or near-to-perfect manifestation of eternal justice and democratic principle? Why ought we to eagerly subscribe to the hopeful premise that this time 'modernity' and real/potential change of massive proportions will be welcomed by all and that it will not scare the **** out of so many to the point where they will do what has been done so often before?

America has both positives and negatives and it is uncertain which will claim the future.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 11:00 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
The important thing to remember is this, my fellow patriots:

The pretty paint is finally peeling off.

As scary as this is, one has to think of the amazing opportunities this will present for the opposition in '06 and '08.

Cycloptichorn


I haven't had the time to read this entire thread yet, but let me point out that both Phyllis Schlafly and Michael Farris are members of the Council on National Policy (CNP). I'll post again the history of this organization.

The problem with recognizing the danger of this group has been that it sounds paranoid to speak of it as a conspiracy. It is in fact a coordinated plan that has been decades in the making. Complicating it further is that many weird, far out religious groups have been on the case of the CNP for a long time. Their concern has to do with fine points of "the end times" theory in Revelation. It's called pre- vs. post millennialsim (the 1,000 year rule Christ.) Basically, it's about whether the faithful will be taken (the rapture) before or after the tribulation. It's all very complicated and diverse. For those of you who are dying to know more on the exciting subject of Eschatology, you can check it out here:

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:oFVfuavzwCIJ:www.religioustolerance.org/millenni.htm+millennialism&hl=en

Any way, their posts about the CNP look like kooks after kooks and therefore obscures the real dangers. It is scary. Or it was until the "pretty paint" finally began to peel as Cyclo says.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 11:29 am
http://www.buildingequality.us/ifas/cnp/text.html

Quote:
Clothed in secrecy since its founding in 1981, the Council for National Policy is a virtual who's who of the Hard Right. Its membership comprises the Right's Washington operatives and politicians, its financiers, and its hard-core religious arm.

The Hard Right utilizes the CNP's three-times-a-year secret meetings to plan its strategy for implementing the radical right agenda. It is here that the organizers and activists meet with the financial backers who put up the money to carry out their agenda.

Because CNP rules state that "meetings are closed to the media and the general public" and "our membership list is strictly confidential and should not be shared outside the Council," the mainstream press knows very little about the CNP. Through this site, and the Freedom Writer, the Institute for First Amendment Studies is, for the first time, revealing the activities and current membership of the Council for National Policy.

We suggest that readers check your state list for CNP members and contact your local newspaper. We encourage you to use our press release, "Cover Lifted on Secret Conservative Group," available from this site.



This is a list of the Executive Committee members from the beginning until 2000. The list has not been updated since May, 1998. The member list is available at the site above. It's only the list for 1996 and 1998, but both lists are alphabetical as well as according to states.

Executive Committee


Executive Committee
Edward G. Atsinger III
June 2000

Gary Bauer
June 1998

Beverly Danielson
June 1999

Stuart W. Epperson
June 2000

Edwin J. Feulner Jr.
June 1999

Foster Friess
President
June 1999

Preston Hawkins
June 1999

Donald Paul Hodel
Vice President
June 1998

Louis "Woody" Jenkins
June 1999

Reed Larson
Secretary/Treasurer
June 1998

Marion "Mac" Magruder
June 1998

James C. Miller III
June 2000

Oliver L. North
June 1998

Lowell Smith
June 2000

LaNeil Wright Spivy
June 2000

Senior Executive Committee
and Past Presidents

Edwin Meese III
1993-1997

Rich DeVos
1990-1993 and 1986-1988

Paul Pressler
1988-1990

M.G. "Pat" Robertson
1985-1986

Sam Moore
1984-1985

Nelson Bunker Hunt
1983-1984

Tom Ellis
1982-1983

Tim LaHaye
1981-1982

As of May 1998

And the Board of Governors as of May 1998

Board of Governors


Howard Ahmanson
Daniel B. Allison II
Thomas R. Anderson
Thomas Armstrong
Edward G. Atsinger III
John Beckett
Ray Berryman
James K. Blinn
Robert L. Cone
Peter C. Cook
Holland H. Coors
Jeffrey H. Coors
T. Kenneth Cribb Jr.
James Czirr
Beverly Danielson
Rich DeVos
Ann Drexel
Stuart W. Epperson
Jerry Falwell
Edwin J. Feulner Jr.
Foster Friess
H. Preston Hawkins
Thomas D. Hess
James Martin Hill
Roland Hinz
Donald Paul Hodel
Mary Reilly Hunt
Lorena Jaeb
Woody Jenkins
Tim LaHaye
Jerome M. Ledzinski
Edward A. Lozick
Mac Magruder
James D. McCotter
Sam Moore
James S. Price
Elsa Prince
Rich Riddle
John Scribante
Lynda Scribante
Dal Shealy
Jim R. Smith
Lowell Smith
Geraldine Snyder
Stacy Taylor
Christine Vollmer
Craig Welch
Paul Weyrich

As of May 1998
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 12:06 pm
Lola - Thank you for the info. Some interesting names on that list that ppear in connection to nymerous organizations.

Blatham - Thoughtful post to which I wish I had answers. I tend to be an optomist, but am becoming increasingly less so.
0 Replies
 
chiczaira
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 01:07 pm
Justice Kennedy will not be impeached. Any one who threatens the Justice, in my opinion, is an unmitigated moron.

There are many in the USA who feel that when the Supreme Court makes judgments that are opposed to their pet causes, those judges must then be removed. Nonsense.

Supreme Court Judges are appointed for life. The last decade has seen a flurry of strong critiques and even personal attacks aimed at Supreme Court Judges. Judge Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas have been the objects of scorn and invective. Judge Thomas, who was rated by Professor Guido Calabrese at Yale Law School as a student of the same caliber as Hillary Rodham Clinton, has been vilified as a "know nothing".

Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy will remain on the bench until death or retirement and no amount of partisan sniping will make any difference.

I recall the cries of rage and disbelief that were made when Roe Vs. Wade was adjudicated.

I remember the scorn heaped upon the Supreme Court when the judgment in Gore Vs. Bush was announced.

No matter. The decisions are codified law.

I am of the opinion that the latest cries for impeachment come from the extremists who are really serving the aims of the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee. There is cuurently a dispute with regard to the appointment of some Appealate
Court Judges. The current ploy may be an attempt to marshall public opinion against those in the Senate who would hold up such nominations.

BUT, Kennedy will remain as a Supreme Court judge--no one should think differently.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 03:29 pm
chiczaira wrote:
Justice Kennedy will not be impeached. Any one who threatens the Justice, in my opinion, is an unmitigated moron.

There are many in the USA who feel that when the Supreme Court makes judgments that are opposed to their pet causes, those judges must then be removed. Nonsense.

Supreme Court Judges are appointed for life. The last decade has seen a flurry of strong critiques and even personal attacks aimed at Supreme Court Judges. Judge Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas have been the objects of scorn and invective. Judge Thomas, who was rated by Professor Guido Calabrese at Yale Law School as a student of the same caliber as Hillary Rodham Clinton, has been vilified as a "know nothing".

Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy will remain on the bench until death or retirement and no amount of partisan sniping will make any difference.

I recall the cries of rage and disbelief that were made when Roe Vs. Wade was adjudicated.

I remember the scorn heaped upon the Supreme Court when the judgment in Gore Vs. Bush was announced.

No matter. The decisions are codified law.

I am of the opinion that the latest cries for impeachment come from the extremists who are really serving the aims of the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee. There is cuurently a dispute with regard to the appointment of some Appealate
Court Judges. The current ploy may be an attempt to marshall public opinion against those in the Senate who would hold up such nominations.

BUT, Kennedy will remain as a Supreme Court judge--no one should think differently.


My god, I think I may agree with chic. I'm going to faint.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 03:31 pm
Quote:
'
Spongebob' Dobson likens Supreme Court to Klan (audio)
When right wing radicals are unhappy with judicial rulings they take aim at the American judiciary. After last week's (not so-) passive aggressive comments by Tom DeLay and John Cornyn: "'the nation's most influential evangelical leader' compare[d] the justices of the Supreme Court (men in black robes) to the KKK (the men in white robes). These are crazy people, and they have the ears of our leaders," writes Oliver. (Kryptonite To Stupid)
Quote:


http://www.alternet.org/peek/

click on "Supreme Court (man in black robes) to KKK" and you can hear it for yourself. James Dobson is one of the ring leadres. These people are as crazy as a crazy fox.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 03:44 pm
The real problem is the imperial wizard who contaminates the white house.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 04:11 pm
squinney wrote:
Lola - Thank you for the info. Some interesting names on that list that ppear in connection to nymerous organizations.


Yes there are, Squinney. And let's look at the first member listed under the Board of Governors:

http://www.americanfundamentalists.com/cast/ahmanson.html

Quote:
The Cast of Characters (return to cast list)
Money: Howard Ahmanson Jr.

"The Episcopal Church split is only a small part of Ahmanson's concerted efforts to radically transform not only American religion, but the nation's moral culture and, thereby, the country itself. His money has made possible some of the most pivotal conservative movements in America's recent history, including the 1994 GOP takeover of the California Assembly, a ban on gay marriage and affirmative action in California, and the mounting nationwide campaign to prove Darwin wrong about evolution. His financial influence also helped propel the recent campaign to recall California Gov. Gray Davis. And besides contributing cash to George W. Bush's 2000 presidential campaign, Ahmanson has played an important role in driving Bush's domestic agenda by financing the career of Marvin Olasky, a conservative intellectual whose ideas inspired the creation of the new White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.

After more than 20 years of politically oriented philanthropy, Ahmanson is now emerging as one of the major financial angels of the right, putting him in the company of Richard Mellon Scaife, the oil and banking heir who bankrolled the groundwork for much of the conservative movement's apparatus and became a household name in the 1990s thanks to his $2.4 million dirty-tricks campaign against President Bill Clinton." (Max Blumenthal, salon.com 1/6/04 - read complete article).

Quotes

"My goal is the total integration of biblical law into our lives. (Orange County Register, 1985)

Links:
Three New Testament Roots of Economic Liberty, by Howard Ahmanson, Religion & Liberty 1997
Ahmanson makes the biblical argument for no minimum wage, no right to healthcare, and no requirement for compassion towards the poor - good thing god made him a wealthy man (he inherited $300,000,000 from his dad at age 18)!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 04:20 pm
squinney wrote:
Lola - Thank you for the info. Some interesting names on that list that ppear in connection to nymerous organizations.

Blatham - Thoughtful post to which I wish I had answers. I tend to be an optomist, but am becoming increasingly less so.


squinny

Sorry. I realized sometime after posting that what I wrote might be construed rather more negatively than I intended, or than I actually think.

Things are nuts right now...moreso than I assumed could happen in a modern western state. And it does seem, in important ways, counter-intuitive that America might be the context. But what foments or whispers that counter-intuition in us might well turn out to be the truer picture.

At the very least though, we ought to allow that if things go too much further, the trouble will not be small.

In the last two months, we have seen public statements saying "this growth of power of the religious right in the Republican Party and hence in the politics of the US is very dangerous indeed". That is US Senator (and Baptist preacher) Danforth just published. It is precisely the same alert published two weeks ago by Walter Cronkite. Bill Moyers has been even more strident. These are rational and balanced men with more than a century's direct experience with US politics. They are just the most recent, some of the most easily visible alerts.

What they are hoping will arise from their alerts is that fewer of us will be complacent, that fewer of us will just assume some national auto-healing process will engage and act to eliminate the nuttiness.

This week, NBC will be airing prime time the beginning episode of a mini-series based on tribulation. End Times is a marketing phenomenon. More than 40 million end times books have been sold. And that is just a portion of the whole picture etc

And what's the story? The second coming. But it's a doozy...nuclear conflagrations, planes suddenly losing a stewardess and 18 passengers and the pilot and co-pilot (lifted, being among the faithful) and the plane crashes into an elementary school. All over the world. And then, at god's right hand, the faithful will stand and watch the pleasing sight of smoke rising from the scalding pits of hell where everyone else is burned forever. Could there possibly be a better evidence of how righteous those few faithful were to hate (and pray for vengeance to) humankind as deeply as they do?

And being America, we'll not be surprised to see bulk mail arrive at our doors or into our email offering, "Will you be left behind? Learn how to become one of the faithful...in two days flat! Results guaranteed!"

I hope that's more cheery.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 04:33 pm
blatham wrote:
squinney wrote:
Lola - Thank you for the info. Some interesting names on that list that ppear in connection to nymerous organizations.

Blatham - Thoughtful post to which I wish I had answers. I tend to be an optomist, but am becoming increasingly less so.


squinny

Sorry. I realized sometime after posting that what I wrote might be construed rather more negatively than I intended, or than I actually think.

Things are nuts right now...moreso than I assumed could happen in a modern western state. And it does seem, in important ways, counter-intuitive that America might be the context. But what foments or whispers that counter-intuition in us might well turn out to be the truer picture.

At the very least though, we ought to allow that if things go too much further, the trouble will not be small.

In the last two months, we have seen public statements saying "this growth of power of the religious right in the Republican Party and hence in the politics of the US is very dangerous indeed". That is US Senator (and Baptist preacher) Danforth just published. It is precisely the same alert published two weeks ago by Walter Cronkite. Bill Moyers has been even more strident. These are rational and balanced men with more than a century's direct experience with US politics. They are just the most recent, some of the most easily visible alerts.

What they are hoping will arise from their alerts is that fewer of us will be complacent, that fewer of us will just assume some national auto-healing process will engage and act to eliminate the nuttiness.

This week, NBC will be airing prime time the beginning episode of a mini-series based on tribulation. End Times is a marketing phenomenon. More than 40 million end times books have been sold. And that is just a portion of the whole picture etc

And what's the story? The second coming. But it's a doozy...nuclear conflagrations, planes suddenly losing a stewardess and 18 passengers and the pilot and co-pilot (lifted, being among the faithful) and the plane crashes into an elementary school. All over the world. And then, at god's right hand, the faithful will stand and watch the pleasing sight of smoke rising from the scalding pits of hell where everyone else is burned forever. Could there possibly be a better evidence of how righteous those few faithful were to hate (and pray for vengeance to) humankind as deeply as they do?

And being America, we'll not be surprised to see bulk mail arrive at our doors or into our email offering, "Will you be left behind? Learn how to become one of the faithful...in two days flat! Results guaranteed!"

I hope that's more cheery.



Cheery doesn't begin to describe it. Are you available for children's parties? Laughing
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 05:36 pm
blatham wrote:
[
That is US Senator (and Baptist preacher) Danforth just published.



Danforth is a former Senator and an Episcopalian (Aglican) priest (I think). The problem is among the Baptists.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 05:36 pm
blatham wrote:
[
That is US Senator (and Baptist preacher) Danforth just published.



Danforth is a former Senator and an Episcopalian (Aglican) priest (I think). The problem is among the Baptists.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 05:37 pm
blatham wrote:
[
That is US Senator (and Baptist preacher) Danforth just published.



Danforth is a former Senator and an Episcopalian (Aglican) priest (I think). The problem is among the Baptists.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 05:55 pm
http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6949&abbr=cs_

Quote:
Behind Closed Doors
Who Is The Council For National Policy And What Are They Up To? And Why Don't They Want You To Know?
by Jeremy Leaming and Rob Boston

When a top U.S. senator receives a major award from a national advocacy organization, it's standard procedure for both the politician and the group to eagerly tell as many people about it as possible.

Press releases spew from fax machines and e-mails clog reporters' in-boxes. The news media are summoned in the hope that favorable stories will appear in the newspapers, on radio and on television.

It was odd, therefore, that when U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) accepted a "Thomas Jefferson Award" from a national group at the Plaza Hotel in New York City in August, the media weren't notified. In fact, they weren't welcome to attend.

"The media should not know when or where we meet or who takes part in our programs, before or after a meeting," reads one of the cardinal rules of the organization that honored Frist.

The membership list of this group is "strictly confidential." Guests can attend only with the unanimous approval of the organization's executive committee. The group's leadership is so secretive that members are told not to refer to it by name in e-mail messages. Anyone who breaks the rules can be tossed out.

What is this group, and why is it so determined to avoid the public spotlight?

That answer is the Council for National Policy (CNP). And if the name isn't familiar to you, don't be surprised. That's just what the Council wants.

The CNP was founded in 1981 as an umbrella organization of right-wing leaders who would gather regularly to plot strategy, share ideas and fund causes and candidates to advance the far-right agenda. Twenty-three years later, it is still secretly pursuing those goals with amazing success.

Since its founding, the tax-exempt organization has been meeting three times a year. Members have come and gone, but all share something in common: They are powerful figures, drawn from both the Religious Right and the anti-government, anti-tax wing of the ultra-conservative movement.

It may sound like a far-left conspiracy theory, but the CNP is all too real and, its critics would argue, all too influential.

What amazes most CNP opponents is the group's ability to avoid widespread public scrutiny. Despite nearly a quarter century of existence and involvement by wealthy and influential political figures, the CNP remains unknown to most Americans. Operating out of a non-descript office building in the Washing­ton, D.C., suburb of Fairfax, Va., the organization has managed to keep an extremely low profile an amazing feat when one considers the people the CNP courts.

New York Times reporter David Kirkpatrick was finally able to pierce the CNP veil in August when he attended a gathering of the group in New York City just before the Republican convention, where the organization presented Frist with the "Jefferson Award."

The Times described the CNP as consisting of "a few hundred of the most powerful conservatives in the country" who meet "behind closed doors at undisclosed locations…to strategize about how to turn the country to the right."

Accepting the award, Frist acknowledged the group's power, telling attendees, "The destiny of the nation is on the shoulders of the conservative movement."

The CNP meeting was perhaps more important than what took place on the carefully choreographed GOP convention stage a few days later, said Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

"The real crux of this is that these are the genuine leaders of the Republican Party, but they certainly aren't going to be visible on television next week," Lynn told The Times days before the start of the GOP convention. "The CNP members are not going to be visible next week, but they are very much on the minds of George W. Bush and Karl Rove every week of the year, because these are the real powers in the party."

The Times' Kirkpatrick was able to obtain the CNP's current membership list and reported that its roster includes Focus on the Family founder James C. Dobson, Paul Weyrich of the Free Congress Foundation, Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association and Grover Norquist, head of Americans for Tax Reform. A CNP financial disclosure form for 2002 lists Norquist and Howard Phillips, founder of the ultra-conservative Constitution Party, as directors. The current president of the group is Donald P. Hodel, former executive director of the Christian Coalition.

Other CNP directors include names that would not mean a lot to most people, but they are key players in the right-wing universe. Becky Norton Dunlop is vice president for external relations at the Heritage Foundation. James C. Miller III is former director of Citizens for a Sound Economy. Stuart W. Epperson owns a chain of Christian radio stations. E. Peb Jackson is former president of Young Life. T. Kenneth Cribb Jr., vice president of the CNP, was a domestic policy advisor to President Ronald W. Reagan and runs the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, a group that funds right-wing newspapers on college campuses. Ken Raasch is a businessman who works in partnership with popular artist Thomas Kinkade.

Others who have been affiliated with the CNP include TV preachers Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, longtime anti-feminist crusader Phyllis Schlafly, Iran-Contra figure turned right-wing talk radio host Oliver North, former U.S. Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.), wealthy Cali­fornia savings and loan heir Howard Ahmanson, former House Majority Leader Dick Army (R-Texas), Attorney General John Ashcroft and Tommy Thompson, secretary of the U.S. Depart­ment of Health and Human Services.

Republican Party glitterati and top government officials frequently appear at CNP meetings. During the gathering before this year's GOP convention, The New York Times reported that several Bush administration representatives were scheduled for speeches. Under­secretary of State John Bolton spoke about plans for Iran, Assistant Attorney General Alexander Acosta talked about human trafficking and Dan Senor, who worked for Paul Bremer in Iraq, was scheduled to talk about the war there.

The Times said the CNP meeting was focused on the Bush-Cheney re-election efforts and quoted an anonymous participant who called the gathering a "pep rally" for the president's campaign. Passing a federal marriage amendment and using that subject as a wedge issue was also a top priority.

The newspaper noted that another CNP meeting that took place shortly after the American invasion of Iraq included visits from Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. A Canadian newspaper reported that Rumsfeld provided the gathering's keynote address and that Cheney was scheduled to speak. (See "People & Events," June 2003 Church & State.)

In April of 2002, according to an ABC News story that ran online, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was the keynote speaker at a CNP meeting in a northern Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C., where White House counsel Alberto Gonzales and Timothy Goeglein, a White House liaison to religious communities, also spoke.

Heavy-hitters such as these show that the CNP is a force to be reckoned with, and Republican politicians ignore the group at their peril. In 1999, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush appeared before a CNP gathering in San Antonio, and, in a closed-door meeting, assured the members of his right-wing bona fides. Bush critics demanded that the president release the text of his remarks, but he refused. Nonetheless, rumors soon surfaced that Bush promised the CNP to implement its agenda and vowed to appoint only anti-abortion judges to the federal courts.

How did this influential organization get its start? To find the answer, it's necessary to go all the way back to 1981 and the early years of the Reagan presidency.

Excited by Reagan's election, Tim LaHaye, Richard Viguerie, Weyrich and a number of far-right conservatives began meeting to discuss ways to maximize the power of the ultra-conservative movement and create an alternative to the more centrist Council on Foreign Relations. In mid May, about 50 of them met at the McLean, Va., home of Viguerie, owner of a conservative fund-raising company.

Viguerie had a knack for networking. Shortly before helping launch the CNP, Viguerie and Weyrich initiated the Moral Majority and tapped Falwell to run it, making the obscure Lynchburg pastor a major political figure overnight. Viguerie's goal was to lead rural White voters in the South out of the Democratic Party and into the Republican Party by emphasizing divisive social issues such as abortion, gay rights and school prayer.

Back when the CNP was founded, it was a little less media shy. In the summer of 1981, Woody Jenkins, a former Louisiana state lawmaker who served as the group's first executive director, told Newsweek bluntly, "One day before the end of this century, the Council will be so influential that no president, regardless of party or philosophy, will be able to ignore us or our concerns or shut us out of the highest levels of government."

From the beginning, the CNP sought to merge two strains of far-right thought: the theocratic Religious Right with the low-tax, anti-government wing of the GOP. The theory was that the Religious Right would provide the grassroots activism and the muscle. The other faction would put up the money.

The CNP has always reflected this two-barreled approach. The group's first president was LaHaye, then president of Family Life Seminars in El Cajon Calif. LaHaye, a fundamentalist Baptist preacher who went on in the 1990s to launch the popular "Left Behind" series of apocalyptic potboilers, was an early anti-gay crusader and frequent basher of public education and he still is today.

Alongside figures like LaHaye and leaders of the anti-abortion movement, the nascent CNP also included Joseph Coors, the wealthy beer magnate; Herbert and Nelson Bunker Hunt, two billionaire investors and energy company executives known for their advocacy of right-wing causes, and William Cies, another wealthy businessman.

Interestingly, the Hunts, Cies and LaHaye all were affiliated with the John Birch Society, the conspiracy-obsessed anti-communist group founded in 1959. LaHaye had lectured and conducted training seminars frequently for the Society during the 1960s and '70s a time when the group was known for its campaign against the civil rights movement.

Bringing together the two strains of the far right gave the CNP enormous leverage. The group, for example, could pick a candidate for public office and ply him or her with individual donations and PAC money from its well-endowed, business wing.

The goals of the CNP, then, are similarly two-pronged. Activists like Nor­quist, who once said he wanted to shrink the federal government to a size where it could be drowned in a bathtub, are drawn to the group for its exaltation of unfettered capitalism, hostility toward social-service spending and low (or no) tax ideology.

Dramatically scaling back the size of the federal government and abolishing the last remnants of the New Deal may be one goal of the CNP, but many of the foot soldiers of the Religious Right sign on for a different crusade: a desire to remake America in a Christian fundamentalist image.

Since 1981, CNP members have worked assiduously to pack government bodies with ultra-conservative lawmakers who agree that the nation needs a major shift to the right economically and socially. They rail against popular culture and progressive lawmakers, calling them the culprits of the nation's moral decay. Laws must be passed and enforced, the group argues, that will bring organized prayer back to the public schools, outlaw abortion, prevent gays from achieving full civil rights and fund private religious schools with tax funds.

The CNP does not directly fund these activities itself. In fact, a glance at the group's publicly available financial statements reveals a modest budget. In 2002, the CNP operated with income of just over $1.2 million. The national office has just a handful of staff members.

(In no way a grassroots organization, the CNP gets much of its money from far-right foundations. The Coors family and Richard DeVos, founder of Amway, have been among the CNP's largest financial backers. The group received $125,000 from a Coors family philanthropic arm, the Castle Rock Foun­dation, and the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation. Richard DeVos was also one of the CNP's early presidents and Jeffrey and Holly Coors have been members for many years.)

The CNP's budgetary figures don't tell the whole story, however. Financial data shows that the bulk of its money $815,227 in 2002 is spent on "educational conferences and seminars for national leaders in the fields of business, government, religion and academia to explore national policy alternatives." An additional $69,108 was spent on "weekly newsletters…distributed to all members to keep them apprised of member activities and public policy issues."

In other words, the CNP is merely a facilitator. While the group has an affiliated arm CNP Action that does some lobbying, in the main it does not work directly to implement the schemes its members devise during the three yearly meetings. The well-heeled leaders and their affiliated organizations are expected to come up with their own funds to pay for the plots hatched during the meetings.

Despite the group's obsessive desire for secrecy, some information has leaked out over the years, mainly due to the persistent efforts of a few writers and researchers.

In 1988, writer Russ Bellant noted in his book The Coors Connection, which details the beer dynasty's funding of right-wing causes and groups, that many CNP members have been associated with the outer reaches of the conservative movement. Bellant found that among the far right, there is a certain cachet to being a CNP member. Members pay thousands of dollars yearly to keep their CNP membership. Bellant noted that at the time, individuals paid $2,000 per year for membership and those seeking a spot on the CNP's board of directors shelled out $5,000 each.

Research undertaken by a now-defunct watchdog group, the Institute for First Amend­ment Studies (IFAS), shed some more light on the group's activities. For many years running, IFAS founder Skip Porteous was able to obtain CNP membership lists, which he posted online.

Bellant noted that Tom Ellis, a top political operative of the ultra-conservative Jesse Helms, followed LaHaye as the CNP president in 1982. Ellis had a checkered past, having served as a director of a foundation called the Pioneer Fund, which has a long history of subsidizing efforts to prove blacks are genetically inferior to whites.

Bellant's book, as well as work by the IFAS, reveals other CNP members who have flirted with extremist and hateful propaganda.

In addition to obsessing over communist threats and buttressing white supremacist ideology, the CNP has included many members bent on replacing American democracy with theocracy.

LaHaye, like the whole of the nation's Religious Right leaders, nurtures a strong contempt for the First Amendment principle of church-state separation, because it seriously complicates their goal of installing fundamentalist Christianity as the nation's officially recognized religion. LaHaye has worked within the CNP and other groups to replace American law with "biblical law." (See "Left Behind," February 2002 Church & State.)

Former Christian Coalition head Ralph Reed has also been involved with the CNP and addressed the group during the August GOP meeting in New York. Asked about his relationship with the CNP by CNN's Wolf Blitzer Aug. 29, Reed fell back on the common ploy of asserting that the group is just a ramped-up social club.

"I think it's like-minded individuals who believe in conservative public policy views. And they get together a few times a year," said Reed (whose CNP topic was "The 2004 Elections: Who Will Win in November?").

Reed, now a top official of the Bush-Cheney campaign, said he is no longer a CNP member, asserting that he quit because "I was just busy doing other things."

The CNP goes way beyond LaHaye and Reed in its effort to embrace the Religious Right. For many years, the late leader of the Christian Recon­struc­tionist movement, Rousas J. Rushdoony, was a member. Reconstructionists espouse a radical theology that calls for trashing the U.S. Constitution and replacing it with the harsh legal code of the Old Testament. They advocate the death penalty for adulterers, blasphemers, incorrigible teen­agers, gay people, "witches" and those who worship "false gods."

Another CNP-Reconstruc­tionist tie comes through Howard Phillips, the Con­stitution Party leader. Phillips, a longtime CNP member, is a disciple of Rushdoony and uses rhetoric that strikes a distinctly Reconstructionist tone. In a 2003 Constitution Party gathering in Clackamas, Oregon, Phillips told party members and guests, "We've got to be ready when God chooses to let us restore our once-great Republic." A report by the Southern Poverty Law Center said that Phillips proclaimed that his party was "raising up an army" to "take back this nation!"

The CNP has provided more prominent Religious Right figures, such as Dob­son, with a forum to promote church-state merger and shove the Republican Party toward the right. In 1998, Dobson ap­peared before a CNP gathering where he admitted he voted for Constitution Party nominee Phillips in the 1996 presidential election instead of Republican candidate Bob Dole. Dobson threatened to bolt the Republican Party and take "as many people with me as possible" if the GOP did not stop taking Christian conservatives for granted. (Dobson's speech, like all addresses before CNP functions, was not intended for media coverage. A transcript was published by the IFAS, which was able to gain access to the meeting. The transcript remains avail­able on the Internet at www.buildingequality.us/ifas /cnp/dobson.html.)

Dobson railed against the Repub­lican-controlled Congress for apparently giving short shrift to the "pro-moral community" and easily acquiescing to a "post-modern notion, that there is no moral law to the universe." That notion, Dobson said, has spread throughout the nation like a cancer.

For Dobson, the moral law of the universe is clear and should be evident to all lawmakers. The universe "has a boss," he said. "And He has very clear ideas of what is right and wrong."

Dobson blasted the Republican-led Congress for increasing funding to Planned Parenthood and the National Endowment of the Arts and for espousing a "safe sex ideology" that he said includes advocacy of the use of condoms to help prevent sexually transmitted diseases.

All of this, Dobson said, directly contravenes God's law.

"It's a lack of conviction that there is a boss to the universe and that there are moral standards that we are held to and we need officials that will stand up and respect them," Dobson said.

Dobson concluded his lecture by begging CNP members "shamelessly, to use your influence on the party at this critical stage of our history. You have a lot of influence on the party. A lot of you are politicians. I beg you to talk to them about what's at stake here because they've laid the foundation for a revolt and I don't think they even know it because they're so out of touch with the people that I'm talking about."

Dobson seemed fully aware that he was speaking to an ultra-partisan group. Indeed, the ABCNews.com report noted that some CNP members have bragged about helping "Christian conservatives" take over Republican state party operations in several Southern and Mid­western states.

The CNP's current executive director, a former California lawmaker named Steve Baldwin, has tried to downplay the organization's influence on powerful state and national lawmakers. He has remained cagey about the CNP's goals, insisting it is merely a group that counters liberal policy arguments.

In many ways, Baldwin himself exemplifies the CNP's operate-in-secret strategy. As a political strategist in Cali­fornia in the early 1990s, Baldwin was one of the key architects of the "stealth strategy" that led to Religious Right activists being elected to school boards and other local offices.

"Stealth candidates" were trained to emphasize pocketbook issues such as taxes and spending. But once elected, they would pursue a Religious Right agenda, such as demanding creationism in public schools. A spate of the candidates won election in Southern Cali­fornia in the early 1990s, but most were later removed by the voters when the true agenda became apparent.

Baldwin tried to use the stealth strategy during his own campaign for the California Assembly in 1992. He lost that race but fared better in 1994, winning election to a seat in the 77th Assembly District. While in office, he helped lead efforts by Religious Right conservatives to take over the state GOP and, briefly, the entire Assembly.

Baldwin had to leave the Assembly in 2000 after serving six years due to California's term-limits law. According to one California media outlet, his hard-right views had by then alienated most other members of the Assembly.

But Baldwin refused to let up. In the spring of 2002, while working at the CNP, he penned a controversial article for the law review at TV preacher Pat Robertson's Regent University. The piece, "Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement," linked pedo­philia to homosexuality.

The article went on to become a staple in the Religious Right's anti-gay canon, despite the fact that its claims were challenged by legitimate researchers.

"It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh," wrote Baldwin. "However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization the nuclear family."

What might the future hold for Baldwin and the CNP? Already Jenkins' vision of a day when powerful politicians would pay heed to the group has come to pass. With social issues such as same-sex marriage increasingly dominating the Religious Right's agenda, the organization is not likely to want for things to do.

Americans United, which has monitored the activities of the CNP for years, says the groups holds radical views and is especially dangerous because of its success in connecting Religious Right activism with the secular right's deep financial pockets.

AU's Lynn said he hopes the media begins to pay more attention to the CNP and expose its goals.

"If the CNP gets its way," Lynn said, "the First Amendment, along with the rest of the U.S. Constitution, will be replaced with fundamentalist dogma. In order to ensure religious liberty for future generations of Americans, the CNP's agenda must be derailed."
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 06:55 pm
If this doesn't scare you, what does?

In Contempt of Courts
By Max Blumenthal
The Nation

Monday 11 April 2005

Washington - Michael Schwartz must have thought I was just another attendee of the "Confronting the Judicial War on Faith" conference. I approached the chief of staff of Oklahoma's GOP Senator Tom Coburn outside the conference in downtown Washington last Thursday afternoon after he spoke there. Before I could introduce myself, he turned to me and another observer with a crooked smile and exclaimed, "I'm a radical! I'm a real extremist. I don't want to impeach judges. I want to impale them!"

For two days, on April 7 and 8, conservative activists and top GOP staffers summoned the raw rage of the Christian right following the Terri Schiavo affair, and likened judges to communists, terrorists and murderers. The remedies they suggested for what they termed "judicial tyranny" ranged from the mass impeachment of judges to their physical elimination.

The speakers included embattled House majority leader Tom DeLay, conservative matriarch Phyllis Schlafly and failed Republican senatorial candidate Alan Keyes. Like a perform­ance artist, Keyes riled the crowd up, mixing animadversions on constitutional law with sudden, stentorian salvos against judges. "Ronald Reagan said the Soviet Union was the focus of evil during the cold war. I believe that the judiciary is the focus of evil in our society today," Keyes declared, slapping the lectern for emphasis.

At a banquet the previous evening, the Constitution Party's 2004 presidential candidate, Michael Peroutka, called the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube "an act of terror in broad daylight aided and abetted by the police under the authority of the governor." Red-faced and sweating profusely, Peroutka added, "This was the very definition of state-sponsored terror." Edwin Vieira, a lawyer and author of How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary, went even further, suggesting during a panel discussion that Joseph Stalin offered the best method for reining in the Supreme Court. "He had a slogan," Vieira said, "and it worked very well for him whenever he ran into difficulty: 'No man, no problem.'"

The complete Stalin quote is, "Death solves all problems: no man, no problem."

The threatening tenor of the conference speakers was a calculated tactic. As Gary Cass, the director of Rev. D. James Kennedy's lobbying front, the Center for Reclaiming America, explained, they are arousing the anger of their base in order to harness it politically. The rising tide of threats against judges "is understandable," Cass told me, "but we have to take the opportunity to channel that into a constitutional solution."

Cass's "solution" is the "Constitution Restoration Act," a bill relentlessly promoted during the conference that authorizes Congress to impeach judges who fail to abide by "the standard of good behavior" required by the Constitution. If they refuse to acknowledge "God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government," or rely in any way on international law in their rulings, judges also invite impeachment. In essence, the bill would turn judges' gavels into mere instruments of "The Hammer," Tom DeLay, and Christian-right cadres.

Conference speakers framed the Constitution Restoration Act in pseudo-populist terms--the only means of controlling a branch of government hijacked by a haughty liberal aristocracy against the will of the American people. As Michael Schwartz remarked during a panel discussion, "The Supreme Court says we have the right to kill babies and the right to commit buggery. They say the people have no right to express themselves, that the people have no right to make laws. Until we have a court that reflects a majority," Schwartz continued, his voice rising steadily, "it is a sick and sad joke that we have a Constitution here."

The right wing claims that judges should reflect majority opinion. But what is the majority opinion? After DeLay and Senate majority leader Bill Frist passed special bills ordering federal courts to consider the reinsertion of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, according to a Gallup poll, Congress's public approval rating sank to 37 percent, lower than at any time since shortly after Republicans impeached President Bill Clinton. Meanwhile, 66 percent of respondents to a March 23 CBS News poll thought Schiavo's feeding tube should be removed. The notion that the Christian right's agenda is playing well in Peoria must be accepted on faith alone.

The recent right-wing fixation on impeaching judges was conceptualized by David Barton, Republican consultant and vice chairman of the Texas GOP. In 1996 Barton published a handbook called Impeachment: Restraining an Overactive Judiciary, which was timed to coincide with Tom DeLay's bid for legislation authorizing Congress to impeach judges. "The judges need to be intimidated," DeLay told reporters that year.

In 1989 Barton published a book titled The Myth of Separation, which proclaims, "This book proves that the separation of church and state is a myth." The Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs, in a critique of his 1995 documentary America's Godly Heritage, stated that it was "laced with exaggerations, half-truths, and misstatements of fact." Barton is on the board of advisers of the Providence Foundation, a Christian Reconstructionist group that promotes the idea that biblical law should be instituted in America. In 1991 Barton spoke at a Colorado retreat sponsored by Pastor Pete Peters, an adherent of racist Christian Identity theology with well-established neo-Nazi ties. During the 2004 presidential campaign, the Republican National Committee hired him as a paid consultant for "evangelical outreach." The RNC sponsored more than 300 events for him.

DeLay's bill, based on Barton's writings, failed due to lack of GOP support. But the judicial impeachment campaign was reignited six years later when a federal court ordered the removal of then-Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore's Ten Commandments monument from courthouse grounds. In February 2004 a group of about twenty-five enraged ministers and movement leaders gathered in Dallas to plot a new response. The Constitution Restoration Act was the result. According to Moore, he was a principal author, along with Herb Titus, the former dean of Pat Robertson's Regent University law school, and Howard Phillips, a veteran third-party activist whose US Taxpayers' Party served as a vehicle for the antigovernment militia movement during the 1990s. All three men stalked the halls of the downtown Marriott last Thursday and Friday.

In the Senate the bill was sponsored by Richard Shelby, a senator from Roy Moore's home state; among the co-sponsors is Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, who is contemplating a run for the Republican nomination for President. The bill was introduced on March 3, before the Terri Schiavo affair erupted, before Florida Circuit Judge George Greer ordered the removal of her feeding tube and before he became the poster-child for the right's judicial impeachment campaign.

Now, according to Howard Phillips in a speech to the conference, his "good friend" Wisconsin GOP Representative James Sensenbrenner is planning to hold hearings on the Constitution Restoration Act in the House. DeLay, who appeared on a big screen during a Thursday morning session to call for the removal of "a judiciary run amok," has put his name on the act as the House sponsor.

The Schiavo case remains the flashpoint for the right. That was apparent at a Thursday evening banquet honoring the lead attorney for Terri Schiavo's parents, David Gibbs. After a breathless introduction from Peroutka, who called the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube "an act of terror," Gibbs confidently strode to the lectern while a crowd of about 100 regaled him with a thunderous standing ovation. Baby-faced, with his hair molded tightly against his scalp and clad in a well-tailored navy blue suit, Gibbs maintained a cool disposition during his speech, presenting a sharp visual contrast to the wildly gesticulating, bedraggled figures who held the microphone throughout most of the conference. But Gibbs's impeccable appearance and measured tone were not enough to mask the lurid nature of his speech.

First, Gibbs suggested that Schiavo fell into a persistent vegetative state not because of an eating disorder but as the result of "some form of strangulation or abuse at the hands of her husband, possibly." Then, Gibbs asserted that after Schiavo's parents were awarded millions of dollars by the state to provide for her care, Michael Schiavo "began moving against the family to kill his wife." These claims, however, did not hold up in court because, as Gibbs explained, "a judge that never went to see [Schiavo] was the judge who made the decision that her life did not matter."

As members of the audience gasped, Gibbs painted a vivid portrait of Schiavo in her hospital bed. "Terri Schiavo was as alive as anyone you see sitting here," he said. "She liked my voice. It was loud and deep and she would roll over and try to talk back." But after Judge Greer "literally ordered her barbaric death," everything changed.

Gibbs described his visit to Schiavo's hospital room after her feeding tube had been removed. Schiavo lay in bed "with her eyes sunken deep in her head...she was skeletal," Gibbs recounted. "Then she turned to her mother suddenly, like she wanted to speak, and she just started sobbing." By now, members of the audience were crying.

As soon as he left the stage, one of the event's planners asked all the men in the room to get down on the floor and pray. With no other choice, I moved my plastic-upholstered chair aside, took to my hands and knees and listened as plaintive voices arose all around me with prayers for Schiavo's parents and maledictions against judicial tyranny. A saccharine version of Pachelbel's Canon emanating from the player piano in the hotel lobby seeped through the banquet hall's open doors, suffusing the ceremony with a dreamlike atmosphere. When I finally dared to look up from the ground, I realized that my head was only inches from an enormous posterior belonging to William Dannemeyer, the former congressman who once issued a letter to his colleagues listing twenty-four people with some connection to Bill Clinton who died "under other than natural circumstances."

As the conference attendees filed out of the banquet hall and into the rain-flecked night, mostly silent except for the few who were still sobbing, they seemed prepared to do anything--absolutely anything--against judges. "I want to impale them!" as Michael Schwartz told me.

"This isn't Colombia. This isn't drug lords terrorizing the judiciary. It's America," Florida Judge George Greer declared recently. Greer remains under police guard.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 07:03 pm
<wringing hands>
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Apr, 2005 07:20 pm
Just dropping in here to remind everyone that these people are not nuts. They are deadly serious partisans who believe their mission is ordained by God and Scripture and they have the money and power networks to make their objectives come to fruition.

Do not be afraid. Start working now.

Joe (Call the DA in Washington and ask for indictments)Nation
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 11:49:07