1
   

Impeach Kennedy for Being Supremacist Judge?Or Just Kill Him

 
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 05:06 pm
dlowan wrote:
Yes, but Piffka - a bunch of apparent loonies at some sort of conference does not equal the US Senate/Congress, does it?


May I remind you that a few extreme loonies at a meeting is how the Third Reich started?
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 05:15 pm
dlowan wrote:
Yes, but Piffka - a bunch of apparent loonies at some sort of conference does not equal the US Senate/Congress, does it?

(Genuine questions, by the way - remember I am a long way away!

Our left and right moan and whinge about judicial decisions sometimes - and try to exert pressure - but actually removing a judge??? Whoa! I know our system is a bit different, though.

Here, they just about have to be caught taking money, or being sucked off from under the bench!)


Hard to know.... but the article does say:

Quote:
The conference was organized during the height of the Schiavo controversy by a new group, the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration. This was no collection of fringe characters. The two-day program listed two House members; aides to two senators; representatives from the Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America; conservative activists Alan Keyes and Morton C. Blackwell; the lawyer for Terri Schiavo's parents; Alabama's "Ten Commandments" judge, Roy Moore; and DeLay, who canceled to attend the pope's funeral.


It is just hard to know how far the radicalizing of this Bush government is going to go, but their marshalling the forces of a vehement moralistic group like this has been going on for a while. These people are deadly serious and are absolutely positive that the Creator is on their side. It is really creepy.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 05:45 pm
FYI, Concerned Women for America is headed by Mrs. LaHaye. Yes, the wife of Lahaye the author of the Left Behind series.

http://www.cwfa.org/main.asp

And Mr. Lehaye is tied to Bush as well, so I wouldn't say this is a fringe group with little pull.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4988491/site/newsweek/

Quote:


(See link above for remainder of article)
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 06:14 pm
I am also of the opinion (more paranoia?) that the Patriot Act has nothing to do with fighting terrorism and everything to do with control of civil society in this country. This act makes it much more difficult to remove the radical that are attempting to gain control of the government, and much easier for them to label opposition and expression of opposition to their policies as illegal.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 06:44 pm
I agree, Acquiunk.

And, don't forget that Falwell has added a law school at Liberty University for the purpose of training lawyers and future judges that agree with this "fringe."
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 06:59 pm
If this keeps up the US will be asked to leave the Liberal Democratic States club. When that happens I think it will behove the rest of us to attend your shores (those that can't get into Canada or Mexico for refuge) and take refugees off the beaches much like the rescue of the British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk in 1940. I hope you don't get seasick. Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 07:25 pm
"These people are deadly serious and are absolutely positive that the Creator is on their side. It is really creepy. "


Agreed.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 08:00 pm
Frankly, I'd be ever so happy if their rapture would just happen and take 'em all away. That's what they want... that's what I want.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 08:06 pm
LOL! Piffka, thanks for lightening things up.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 08:54 pm
Piffka wrote:
DrewDad wrote:
Quote:
A judge in Atlanta and the husband and mother of a judge in Chicago were murdered in recent weeks. After federal courts spurned a request from Congress to revisit the Terri Schiavo case, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) said that "the time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior." Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) mused about how a perception that judges are making political decisions could lead people to "engage in violence."

I think this is completely overdone. The killings had nothing to do with the Republican party.


One would certainly hope that is true, but the Stalin quote is a pretty strange way to discuss getting rid of a Supreme, doncha think?

I would agree with that.

I just thought that this particular paragraph was misleading. Sloppy writing at best; deliberately misleading at worst.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 09:20 pm
I hadn't read it that way. I took it as with these things already taking place regarding judges, to have major party players say what they did was careless at the least, and a call to action for their lunatic fringe at its worst. They made it sound like if something just happened to happen (wink, wink) it would be understandable as far as they were concerned.

Within the context of the article I assumed they were pointing these other judge incidents out to more to suggest how dangerous the statements could be.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Apr, 2005 10:09 pm
goodfielder wrote:
If this keeps up the US will be asked to leave the Liberal Democratic States club. When that happens I think it will behove the rest of us to attend your shores (those that can't get into Canada or Mexico for refuge) and take refugees off the beaches much like the rescue of the British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk in 1940. I hope you don't get seasick. Crying or Very sad


It is sorta kinda trying to happen here - I'd get some pills ready.

Mind you - who'd take us with the way we have been treating asylum-seekers/illegals lately?
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 03:23 am
New Zealand Very Happy
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 03:26 am
Hmmmm - bless 'em.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 07:46 am
Quote:
Federal criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. §115 (a)(1)(B). That law states:

"Whoever threatens to assault…. or murder, a United States judge… with intent to retaliate against such… judge…. on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished [by up to six years in prison]"


http://lautenberg.senate.gov/~lautenberg/press/2003/01/2005401638.html
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 07:56 am
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-0/1113026250129460.xml

Quote:
Link to legal group may hurt Bush choices
Demos say views too extreme for bench
Saturday, April 09, 2005
By Sean Reilly
Newhouse News Service
WASHINGTON -- It was November 2003, and Senate Democrats had just repulsed another attempt to confirm Alabama Attorney General William Pryor for a lifetime judgeship on the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

But in a downtown Washington hotel ballroom, dozens of lawyers rose to honor him. The occasion was a national gathering of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization, and the standing ovation came even though Pryor was only moderating a panel discussion....

...Schumer and Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., both questioned another speech that Pryor ended with the prayer, "Please, God, no more Souters." The reference was to Supreme Court Justice David Souter.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:08 am
goodfielder wrote:
New Zealand Very Happy


Someone I know from here has bought a small motel in NZ and is slowly making the change. She is only slightly more radical than I.

She says NZ is wonderful and urges others to consider it.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:30 am
This I found most amazing.
Quote:
"The Constitution is not what the Supreme Court says it is," Schlafly asserted.


Maybe I was taught incorrectly, but I recall from my citizenship classes that it is the Supreme Court's job to interpret the Constitution. If it's not what they say it is, who gets to say what it is?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:38 am
FreeDuck wrote:
This I found most amazing.
Quote:
"The Constitution is not what the Supreme Court says it is," Schlafly asserted.


Maybe I was taught incorrectly, but I recall from my citizenship classes that it is the Supreme Court's job to interpret the Constitution. If it's not what they say it is, who gets to say what it is?


George and Jesus baby. In that order.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Apr, 2005 08:39 am
I thought George was Jesus. "God is in the Whitehouse"
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 09:27:10