timberlandko wrote: The reason Conservative Talk Radio succeeds is that it has a market - it didn't create that market, it simply found itself welcomed and supported by that market.
Rush Limbaugh spent years perfecting his
schtick, hitting just the right notes to excite his conservative audience. The liberals have only recently even begun to try to come up with an answer. They probably will not be able to just copy the methods and styles of the conservative hosts.
People who vote Democratic and people who vote Republican often have different personalities, and tend to have different kinds of humor. So the liberals have to try to find the style which works for them-while the Republicans have been at this since the 1980's.
The simple fact is that the conservative and liberal sides were fairly evenly balanced, with a slight advantage for the Democrats, for a long time until the AM radio went conservative. Then, the capturing of just a small percentage of the voters yielded big changes in the House and Senate-remember, you only have to win a House or Senate race by one vote to get the seat.
You only have to have a majority of one Congressman or one Senator to ensure that EVERY committee has the majority party in the majority, and that every chairman is from the majority party. One vote, and all the committees are controlled by one party.
So a shift of just a few percentage points makes a big difference in the government, and you have to be naive indeed to think that having the entire AM band an extensionof the Republican National Committee can't shift a few percentage points over to the GOP side.
timberlandko wrote:The reason mainstream liberal press circulation and mainstream liberal media news ratings are declining is that they serve a declining market. Increasingly more folks just don't care to hear what The Democrats have to say, and The Democrats have no one but themselves to blame for that.
Ahh, the myth of the "mainstream liberal press". This is the favorite excuse of the conservatives to explain away the excesses of talk radio maniacs.
What "liberal press"is that? Is that the "liberal press" which allowed a president to whip up support for the Iraq invasion on account of WMD's which weren't there-and never checked out the story to debunk it?
What "mainstream liberal press"? What a laugh.